DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploration of High School Science Teachers' Perceptions on Instruction and Assessment of Science II Elective Courses in the 2015 Revised Curriculum

  • Kwak, Youngsun (Department of Earth Science Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2022.08.02
  • 심사 : 2022.08.29
  • 발행 : 2022.08.31

초록

The purpose of this study was to examine the status of the field application of the Science II career electives with the application of the 2015 revised curriculum up to the 3rd year of high school. This study focused on examining high school science teachers' perceptions of the student-participatory class and process-centered assessment in Science II subjects, which are career-intensive high school science electives. A total of 192 science teachers responded to the survey questionnaire, and 12 teachers participated in interviews. In the in-depth interviews conducted to supplement the survey results, questions were asked about changes in the overall class, the status of student-participatory classes, and changes in the assessment of Science II subjects due to the emphasis on process-centered assessment. The main research results included teachers' perceptions of changes in teaching and assessment methods with the application of the revised curriculum, the degree to which the eight skills used in Science II classes develop the key competencies of science, and the teaching and assessment methods commonly used in Science II classes. Science teachers generally agreed with the purpose and necessity of introducing student-participatory classes and process-centered assessment, which are the core purpose of the 2015 revised curriculum. However, they had difficulties in practice due to the excessive content of Science II subjects. Problems were also encountered with securing objectivity and fairness during assessments and the operation of online science classes due to COVID-19.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, S., Shin, C., Hwang, E., Lee, S., Kin, E., Yoo, J., Jung, M., & Song, J. (2015). General manual for the operation of the Free Learning Semester. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute [KEDI].
  2. Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., Berman, S., Spanjers, D., & Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. Best Practices in School Psychology, 5, 1099-1120.
  3. Hong, S., Chang, I., & Kim, T. (2017). Elementary school teachers' recognition of process-centered evaluation using consensual qualitative research. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(4), 47-69.
  4. Jeon, S. (2019). The development and application of process-centered assessment for improving scientific communication skills. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 38(1), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2019.38.1.16
  5. Jin, K., Nam, M., Kim, H., Park, J., Kim, S., & Sim, J. (2018). Investigation of the application of 2015 revised national curriculum (middle & high school): Focused on the diversification of instruction and learning methods. Jincheon: KICE.
  6. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity [KOFAC]. (2019). Monitoring study on the implementation of the 2015 national science curriculum in elementary and secondary schools. Seoul: KOFAC.
  7. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity [KOFAC]. (2020). Analysis of field application of 2015 revised science curriculum. Seoul: KOFAC.
  8. Kwak, Y. (2020). Trend analysis of curriculum application status of 2015 revised integrated science and scientific laboratory experiment curriculum. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 13(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2020.13.1.53
  9. Kwak, Y., & Shin, Y. (2019). Analysis of enacted curriculum through classroom observation of integrated science teaching in 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(3), 337-346. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.3.337
  10. Lee, H., Baek, J., & Kwak, Y. (2020). Middle school science teachers' perceptions of implementation and challenges on process-centered assessment emphasized in the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of Science Education, 44(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2020.44.2.133
  11. Lee, I., & Kwak, Y. (2020). Exploration of the status of course completion and ways to raise selection rates of general elective courses in the 2015 revised science curriculum. Journal of The Korean Association for Science Education, 40(2), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.2.217
  12. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2014). Key point about overview of 2015 integrated national curriculum(draft). Press release (2014.9.24.).
  13. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015). The general explanation of 2015 revised national curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [issue 1]. Sejong: Author.
  14. Park, H., Sim, J., Choi, H., Lim, H., Park, J., Ahn, H., & Yang, S. (2019). Monitoring study on the implementation of the 2015 national science curriculum in elementary and secondary schools. Seoul: KOFAC.
  15. Shin, Y., & Kwak, Y. (2019). Analysis of realities of organization and implementation of Integrated Science of the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of Science Education, 43(1), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2019.43.1.64