DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of As(III) Sorption by Sand and Alumina under Anoxic Conditions

  • Lee, Seungyeol (Department of Geological Sciences, BK21 School of Earth and Environmental Systems, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Minji (Department of Geological Sciences, BK21 School of Earth and Environmental Systems, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Hoon Young (Department of Geological Sciences, BK21 School of Earth and Environmental Systems, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2022.05.30
  • Accepted : 2022.08.01
  • Published : 2022.08.31

Abstract

Under anoxic conditions, this study investigated removal of dissolved As(III) by Si and Al oxides including natural sand, chemically washed sand (silica), alumina, and activated alumina. Despite the similar surface area, natural sand showed greater extents of As(III) sorption than chemically washed sand. This was likely due to the high reactivity of Fe(oxyhydr)oxide impurities on the surface of natural sand. For both sands, As(III) sorption was the greatest at pH 7.1, in agreement with the weakly dissociating tendency of arsenous acid. Also, the least sorption was observed at pH 9.6. At basic pH, elevated silicate, which originated from the dissolution of silica in sands, would compete with As(III) for sorption. Due to the highest surface area, activated alumina was found to quantitatively immobilize the initially added As(III) (6.0×10-7-2.0×10-5 M). Alumina showed As(III) sorption compared to or greater than chemically washed sand, although the former had less than 6% of the surface of area the latter. The greater reactivity of alumina than chemically washed sand can be explained by using the shared charge of oxygen.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a 2-Year Research Grant of Pusan National University.

References

  1. Abdul, K.S., Jayasinghe, S.S., Chandana, E.P., Jayasumana, C., and De Silva, P.M., 2015, Arsenic and human health effects: a review. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 40, 828-846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2015.09.016
  2. Ahmed, K.M., Bhattacharya, P., Hasan, M.A., Akhter, S.H., Alam, S.M.M., Bhuyian, M.A.H., Imam, M.B., Khan, A.A., and Sracek, O., 2004, Arsenic enrichment in groundwater of the alluvial aquifers in Bangladesh: an overview. Applied Geochemistry, 19, 181-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2003.09.006
  3. Bhattacharya, P., Jacks, G., Frisbie, S.H., Smith, E., Naudu, R., and Sarkar, B., 2001, Arsenic in the environment: a global perspective, In Handbook of heavy metals in the environment, Sarkar, B., Ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 145-215.
  4. Brechbuhl, Y., Christl, I., Elzinga, E.J., and Kretzschmar, R., 2012, Competitive sorption of carbonate and arsenic to hematite: combined ATR-FTIR and batch experiments. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 377, 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2012.03.025
  5. Buerge, I.J. and Hug, S.J., 1997, Kinetics and pH dependence of chromium(VI) reduction by Fe(II). Environmental Science & Technology, 31, 1426-1432. https://doi.org/10.1021/es960672i
  6. Buerge, I.J. and Hug, S.J., 1998, Influence of organic ligands on chromium(VI) reduction by iron(II). Environmental Science & Technology 32, 2092-2099. https://doi.org/10.1021/es970932b
  7. Burton, E.D., Bush, R.T., Sullivan, L.A., Hocking, R.K., Mitchell, D.R.G., Johnston, S.G., Fitzpatrick, R.W., Raven, M., McClure, S., and Jang, L.Y., 2009, Iron-monosulfide oxidation in natural sediments: resolving microbially mediated S transformations using XANES, electron microscopy, and selective extractions. Environmental Science & Technology, 43, 3128-3134. https://doi.org/10.1021/es8036548
  8. Chen, G., Shi, H., Tao, J., Chen, L., Liu, Y., Lei, G., Liu, X., and Smol, J.P., 2015, Industrial arsenic contamination causes catastrophic changes in freshwater ecosystems. Scientific Reports, 5, 17419.
  9. Farquhar, M.L., Charnock, J.M., Livens, F.R., and Vaughan, D.J., 2002, Mechanisms of arsenic uptake from aqueous solution by interaction with goethite, lepidocrocite, mackinawite, and pyrite: an X-ray absorption spectroscopy study. Environmental Science & Technology, 36, 1757-1762. https://doi.org/10.1021/es010216g
  10. Ferguson, J.F. and Gavis, J., 1972, A review of the arsenic cycle in natural waters. Water Research, 6, 1259-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(72)90052-8
  11. Ferguson, J.F. and Anderson, M.A., 1973. Chemical forms of arsenic in water supplies and their removal. In Chemistry of water supply treatment and distribution, Rubin, A.J., Ed., Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI, pp.137-158.
  12. Goldhaber, M.B. and Kaplan, I.R., 1974, The sulfur cycle, In The Sea, Goldberg, E.D., Ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp. 569-655.
  13. Gong, Z., Lu, X., Ma, M., Watt, C., and Le, X.C., 2002, Arsenic speciation analysis. Talanta, 58, 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(02)00258-8
  14. Han, Y.S., Jeong, H.Y., Demond, A.H., and Hayes, K.F., 2011, X-ray absorption and photoelectron spectroscopic study of the association of As(III) with nanoparticulate FeS and FeS-coated sand. Water Research, 45, 5727-5735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.026
  15. Hao. L., Liu, M., Wang, N., and Li, G., 2018, A critical review on arsenic removal from water using iron-based adsorbents. RSC Advances, 39545-39560.
  16. Jeong, H.Y., Han, Y.S., and Hayes, K.F., 2010, X-ray absorption and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study of arsenic mobilization during mackinawite (FeS) oxidation. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, 955-961. https://doi.org/10.1021/es902577y
  17. Khan, T., Anwar, S., Wahap, B.A., and Chaudhuri, M., 2012, Adsorption of arsenite from water by rice husk silica. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 11, 229-233.
  18. Kirsch, M., Lomonosova, E.E., Korth, H.-G., Sustmann, R., and de Groot, H., 1998, Hydrogen peroxide formation by reaction of peroxynitrite with HEPES and related tertiary amines. implications for a general mechanism. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 273, 12716-12724. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.21.12716
  19. Kunze, G.W. and Dixon, J.B., 1986, Pretreatment for mineralogical analysis, In Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods, second ed., Kulte, A., Ed., American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp. 91-100.
  20. Lombi, E., Wenzel, W.W., and Sletten, R.S., 1999, Arsenic adsorption by soils and iron-oxide-coated sand: kinetics and reversibility. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 162, 451-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2624(199908)162:4<451::AID-JPLN451>3.0.CO;2-B
  21. Luxton, T.P., Eick, M.J., and Rimstidt, D.J., 2008, The role of silicate in the adsorption/desorption of arsenite on goethite. Chemical Geology, 252, 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.01.022
  22. Masue, Y., Loeppert, R.H., and Kramer, T.A.,2007, Arsenate and arsenite adsorption and desorption behavior on coprecipitated aluminum:iron hydroxides. Environmental Science & Technology, 41, 837-842. https://doi.org/10.1021/es061160z
  23. McBride, M.B., 1994, Environmental Chemistry of Soils, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 1-406.
  24. Park, M., Park, J., Kang, J., Han, Y.S., and Jeong, H.Y., 2018, Removal of hexavalent chromium using mackinawite(FeS)-coated sand. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 360, 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.07.086
  25. Park, M., Kim, S., Kim, S., Ryu, J., Song, Y.-S., and Jeong, H.Y., 2022, Cr(VI) immobilization by FeS-coated alumina and silica: effects of pH and surface coating density. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 421, 126784.
  26. Smedley, P.L. and Kinniburgh, D.G., 2002, A review of the source, behavior, and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Applied Geochemistry, 2002, 17, 517-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00018-5
  27. Tian, Y., Liu, G., Gao, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Fang, Y., Zhu, Z., and Deng, H., 2021, Comparative study on As(III) and As(V) adsorption by CO32--intercalated Fe/Mn-LDHs from aqueous solution. Blue-Green Systems, 3, 175-190. https://doi.org/10.2166/bgs.2021.010
  28. Wei, Z., Liang, K., Wu, Y., Zou, Y., Zuo, J., Arriagada, D.C., Pan, Z., and Hu, G., 2016, The effect of pH on the adsorption of arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) at the TiO2 anatase [101] surface. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 462, 252-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2015.10.018
  29. Wilhelm, S. and Kind, M., 2015, Influence of pH, temperature and sample size on natural and enforced syneresis of precipitated silica. Polymers, 7, 2504-2521. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym7121528
  30. Wolthers, M., Charlet, L., van der Weijden, C.H., van der Linde, P.R., and Rickard, D., 2005, Arsenic mobility in the ambient sulfidic environment: sorption of arsenic(V) and arsenic (III) onto disordered mackinawite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 69, 3483-3492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2005.03.003
  31. Xie, X., Liu, Y., Pi, K., Liu, C., Li, J., Duan, M., and Wang, Y., 2016, In situ Fe-sulfide coating for arsenic removal under reducing conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 534, 42-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.057
  32. Yamauchi, H. and Fowler, B.A., 1994, Toxicity and metabolism of inorganic and methylated arsenicals, In Arsenic in the Environment, Nriagu, J.O., Ed., Wiley, New York, pp 35-53.
  33. Yu, Q., Kandegedara, A., Xu, Y., and Rorabacher, D.B., 1997, Avoiding interferences from Good's buffers: a contiguous series of noncomplexing tertiary amine buffers covering the entire range of pH 3-11. Analytical Biochemistry, 253, 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1997.2349
  34. Zhao, Z., Guan, M., Zeng, H., and Chen, P., 2018, Adsorption and oxidation of As(III) on iron (hydr)oxides. Water Environment Research, 90, 483-489. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143017X15131012153040