DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research trends of mathematics textbooks: An analysis of the journal articles published from 1963 to 2021

수학 교과서 연구의 동향 분석: 1963년부터 2021년까지 게재된 국내 수학교육 학술지 논문을 중심으로

  • Received : 2022.08.11
  • Accepted : 2022.08.23
  • Published : 2022.08.31

Abstract

Mathematics textbooks as the main resources to support mathematical teaching and learning are used importantly in Korean lessons. Although the scope of mathematics textbook research has been expanded and the research has increased, few studies have analyzed the overall trends of mathematics textbook research in Korea. This study analyzes the overall trends of textbook research on 418 papers pertinent to mathematics textbooks published in domestic mathematics education journals. The results of this study showed that the proportion of textbook analysis research was the highest, followed by textbook use and textbook development research in order. There were more textbook studies at the elementary school level than at the middle or high school levels. Regarding textbook analysis studies, the most frequent topic was to analyze how specific mathematical concepts were presented in textbooks. Regarding textbook use studies, many studies asked both teachers and students to review the appropriateness of textbooks under development or analyzed the perception and use of specific activities of textbooks based on a survey. Regarding textbook development studies, the most popular topics included the directions and examples of new development, such as storytelling-based or electronic textbooks. This paper finally presented implications for textbook research in light of the domestic mathematics education context and the international mathematics textbook research trends.

수학 교수 학습을 지원하기 위한 자원으로서의 수학 교과서는 우리나라 수업에서 특히 중요하게 활용된다. 그동안 수학 교과서 연구의 범위가 확장되고 그에 따른 연구가 많아지고 있지만, 정작 우리나라의 수학 교과서 연구의 전반적인 동향을 분석한 연구는 많지 않다. 본 연구는 국내 수학교육 학술지에 게재된 논문 중 수학 교과서와 관련된 418편의 논문을 대상으로 전반적인 교과서 연구의 동향을 분석하였다. 분석 결과 교과서 분석 연구의 비중이 압도적으로 높았고, 다음으로 교과서 활용 연구, 교과서 개발 연구의 순서로 나타났다. 전체적으로 중고등학교급보다 초등학교급에서 교과서 연구가 많았다. 교과서 분석 연구의 경우는 특정한 수학 개념을 교과서에 어떻게 제시하였는지 분석하는 연구가 가장 많았고, 교과서 활용 연구의 경우는 교사와 학생을 대상으로 교과서의 적절성을 검토하거나 특정 코너나 활동에 대한 인식 및 사용실태를 설문조사를 바탕으로 분석하는 경우가 많았다. 교과서 개발 연구의 경우는 스토리텔링과 전자교과서와 같은 새로운 교과서 개발 방향과 예시를 다루는 논문이 많았다. 이와 같은 연구 결과를 토대로, 본 논문은 국내 수학교육 맥락과 국외 수학 교과서 연구의 동향에 비추어 교과서 연구에 대한 시사점을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(3), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009903206236
  2. Adler, J. (2021). Levering change: The contributory role of a mathematics teaching framework. ZDM Mathematics Education, 53(6), 1207-1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01273-y
  3. Cho, S. Y. (2018). Multicultural education shown in elementary school mathematics textbook based on 2015 revised curriculum. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 21(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2018.21.1.19
  4. Cho, Y. M. (2002). An analysis of the characteristics of definitions and exploration the levels of definitions in mathematics textbooks: In the area of geometry. School Mathematics, 4(1), 15-27.
  5. Choppin, J., Davis, J., McDuffie, A. R., & Drake, C. (2021). Influence of features of curriculum materials on the planned curriculum. ZDM Mathematics Education, 53(6), 1249-1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01305-7
  6. Fan, L. (2013). Textbook research as scientific research: Towards a common ground on issues and methods of research on mathematics textbooks. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(5), 765-777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0530-6
  7. Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(5), 633-646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x
  8. Han, C. R., & Lim, W. (2022). Elementary textbook adoption process and teacher decisions. The Mathematical Education, 61(2), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2022.61.2.221
  9. Heo, N. G., & Lew, H. C. (2015). Development and application of action based mathematics digital textbook. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics. 25(2), 241-261.
  10. Jeong, E. C. (1967). An analytic study of arithmetic textbooks. The Mathematical Education, 5(3), 65-72.
  11. Kang, M. H., & Son, H. C. (2019). A study on the Van Hiele level of middle schoool mathematics textbooks and middle school students' geometric thinking. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 22(4), 483-500. http://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2019.22.4.007
  12. Kim, D. Y., & Kim, G. Y. (2014). Secondary mathematics teachers' understanding and modification of mathematical tasks in textbooks. School mathematics, 16(3), 445-469.
  13. Kim, G. Y., & Jeon, M. H. (2017). Exploring how middle school mathematics textbooks on functions provide students an opportunity to learn. School mathematics, 19(2), 289-317.
  14. Kim, S. H., & Na, G. S. (2008) Teaching the concept of rate and ratio: Focused on using the reconstructed textbook. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 18(3), 309-333.
  15. Kim, S. J., & Lee, D. H. (2015). Elementary teachers' perception on the storytelling based mathematics textbooks. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 19(2), 143-158.
  16. Kim, W., Choi, S. H., & Kim, D. J. (2018). A discursive approach to analysis of definition of graph in first year middle school textbooks. Communications of Mathematical Education, 32(3), 407-433. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2018.32.3.407
  17. Kong, F., & Shi, N. (2009). Process analysis and level measurement of textbooks use by teachers. Frontiers of Education in China, 4(2), 268-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-009-0014-1
  18. Ku, N. Y., & Lee, K. H. (2020). An analysis of research trends on mathematics teacher's curriculum material use in Korea and overseas. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(9), 377-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.9.377
  19. Kwak, G. W., & Ryu, H. A. (2020). An analysis of teachers' perceptions and teaching practices on the 'Inquiry Mathematics' of mathematics textbook in the elementary school. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 24(4), 371-394.
  20. Kwon, J. K., Lee, Y. H., & Lee, B. J. (2013). Changes in the in-service teachers' perception after applying mathematics textbook based on storytelling for elementary first and second grades. School Mathematics, 15(4), 683-699.
  21. Kwon, O. N., Ju, M. K., Park, J. S., Park, J. H., Oh, H. M., & Jo, H. M. (2013). The study on the development principles for the mathematics textbook based on storytelling and the possibility of implementation. Communications of Mathematical Education, 27(3), 249-266. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2013.27.3.249
  22. Lee, J. H., Son, H. R., & Kim, S. K. (2013). An analysis on the examples of polygons in the 1st grade middle school mathematics textbooks. School Mathematics, 15(4), 743-758.
  23. Lee, K. H., & Kang, W. (2008). A journey of the measuring length unit: A description of mathematics textbook development. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics. 18(2), 157-177.
  24. Lee, S. G., Lee, J. H., & Park, K. E. (2017). Development and usage of interactive digital linear algebra textbook. Communications of Mathematical Education, 31(3), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2017.31.3.241
  25. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
  26. Oh, C. Y. (2004). Effects of reorganizing a textbook on mathematics education in a vocational high school. The Mathematical Education, 43(1), 13-34.
  27. Pang, J. S., & Hwang, H. M. (2012). Research trends of mathematics textbooks: Focused on the papers published between 2006 and 2011 in domestic journals. The Mathematical Education, 51(3), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2012.51.3.247
  28. Pang, J. S., & Kim, S. M. (2017). Research trends of mathematics textbooks: Focused on the papers published in domestic journals during recent five years. School Mathematics, 19(2), 249-265.
  29. Pang, J. S., Sunwoo, J., Cho, S. M., Lee, Y, J., Kim, E. K., Kim, Y. Y., Park, Y. J., Kim, K. H., Hwang, J. N., & Lee, H. N. (2019). Domestic research trends of mathematics education: An analysis of journals published from 1963 to 2019. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 29(4), 709-739. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2019.11.29.4.709
  30. Pang, J. S., Sunwoo, J., Kim, E. K., & Kim, Y. Y. (2019). An analysis of lessons to develop an unit in the elementary mathematics textbook: Focused on 'Patterns and Correspondence'. School Mathematics, 21(2), 269-290. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2019.06.21.2.269
  31. Park, M. G. (2013). The meaning and applications of storytelling in elementary mathematics education: Focused on elementary mathematics textbooks. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 17(3), 413-430.
  32. Park, M. G., Chang, H. W., Kim, E. H., Cho, D. K., Kim, Y. S., You, D. H., Nam, M. S., Kim, J. S., Park, W. K., & Tak, B. J. (2015). A study on the development of elementary mathematics textbooks as a thematic approach. School Mathematics, 17(1), 79-98.
  33. Park, S. H., & Pyo, S. S. (2012). Complex number on textbooks and analysis on understanding state of students. The Mathematical Education, 51(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2012.51.1.001
  34. Pepin, B. (2018). Enhancing teacher learning with curriculum resources. In L. Fan, L. Trouche, C. Qi, S. Rezat, & J. Visnovska (Eds.), Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers' resources: Advances and issues (pp. 359-374). Springer.
  35. Pepin, B., Choppin, J., Ruthven, K., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Digital curriculum resources in mathematics education: Foundations for change. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(5), 645-661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0879-z
  36. Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013). Re-sourcing teachers' work and interactions: A collective perspective on resources, their use and transformation. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(7), 929-943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0534-2
  37. Prediger, S., Barzel, B., Hussmann, S., & Leuders, T. (2021). Towards a research base for textbooks as teacher support: The case of engaging students in active knowledge organization in the KOSIMA project. ZDM Mathematics Education, 53(6), 1233-1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01245-2
  38. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211
  39. Remillard, J. T. (2018). Examining teachers' interactions with curriculum resource to uncover pedagogical design capacity. In L. Fan, L. Trouche, C. Qi, S. Rezat, & J. Visnovska (Eds.), Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers' resources: Advances and issues (pp. 69-88). Springer.
  40. Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(5), 705-718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0600-4
  41. Remillard, J. T., Van Steenbrugge, H., Machalow, R., Koljonen, T., Krzywacki, H., Conon, L., & Hemmi, K. (2021). Elementary teachers' reflections on their use of digital instructional resources in four educational contexts: Belgium, Finland, Sweden, and U.S. ZDM Mathematics Education, 53(6), 1331-1345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01295-6
  42. Rezat, S., Fan, L., & Pepin, B. (2021). Mathematics textbooks and curriculum resources as instruments for change. ZDM Mathematics Education, 53(6), 1189-1206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01309-3
  43. Seo, E. M., Cho, S. M., & Pang, J. S. (2019). An analysis of double scale models in the Japanese elementary mathematics textbooks. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 22(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2019.22.1.29
  44. Shim, S. K. (2009). A didactical analysis on history of mathematics in simultaneous equations section of mathematics textbooks. School Mathematics, 11(3), 415-429.
  45. Shin, D. J. (2020). A comparative study of domestic and international research trends of mathematics education through topic modeling. The Mathematical Education, 59(1), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2020.59.1.63
  46. Sievert, H., Van den Ham, A. -K., & Heinze, A. (2021). The role of textbook quality in first graders' ability to solve quantitative comparisons: A multilevel analysis. ZDM Mathematics Education, 53(6), 1417-1431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01266-x
  47. Song, S. H., Lee, Y. H., & Kim, M. O. (1989). A curricular articulation analysis on the probability and statistical subjects in the mathematics textbooks from elementary school to high school. The Mathematical Education, 28(1), 13-27.
  48. Suh, B. E., Han, H. S., Joo, H. Y., & Choi, N. K. (2018). Mathematical competences and capabilities in Korea math education: Korean society of mathematical education yearbook 2017. Kyungmoon.
  49. Suh, H. J., Lee, S. Y., & Han, S. Y. (2019). Educative supports for high school geometry instruction: An examination of, and suggestions for teachers' guides. School Mathematics, 21(3), 531-559. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2019.09.21.3.531
  50. Yoo, B. H., & Um, J. H. (2002). Research about the composition of mathematics textbook for the technical high school. The Mathematical Eucation, 41(1), 1-18.