Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Cardiovascular Research Center (Seoul, South Korea) and funded by Biotronik (Bulach, Switzerland).
References
- Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:1082-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.513
- Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2018;39:213-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419
- Urban P, Mehran R, Colleran R, et al. Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2019;140:240-61. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040167
- Costa F, van Klaveren D, James S, et al. Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials. Lancet 2017;389:1025-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30397-5
- Ueki Y, Karagiannis A, Zanchin C, et al. Validation of high-risk features for stent-related ischemic events as endorsed by the 2017 DAPT guidelines. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019;12:820-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.005
- Ueki Y, Bar S, Losdat S, et al. Validation of the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and comparison with contemporary bleeding risk scores. EuroIntervention 2020;16:371-9. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00052
- Natsuaki M, Morimoto T, Shiomi H, et al. Application of the academic research consortium high bleeding risk criteria in an all-comers registry of percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2019;12:e008307.
- Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1045-57. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0904327
- Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2001-15. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0706482
- Mehran R, Baber U, Sharma SK, et al. Ticagrelor with or without aspirin in high-risk patients after PCI. N Engl J Med 2019;381:2032-42. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1908419
- Kim BK, Hong SJ, Cho YH, et al. Effect of ticagrelor monotherapy vs ticagrelor with aspirin on major bleeding and cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the TICO randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020;323:2407-16. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.7580
- Kim C, Hong SJ, Shin DH, et al. Randomized evaluation of ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with new-generation sirolimus-eluting stents: TICO trial rationale and design. Am Heart J 2019;212:45-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2019.02.015
- Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation 2011;123:2736-47. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449
- Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2012;126:2020-35. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058
- Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 2007;115:2344-51. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313
- Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44:2064-89. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca
- Kim BK, Hong MK, Shin DH, et al. A new strategy for discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy: the RESET Trial (REal Safety and Efficacy of 3-month dual antiplatelet Therapy following Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation). J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1340-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.043
- Capodanno D, Alfonso F, Levine GN, Valgimigli M, Angiolillo DJ. ACC/AHA versus ESC guidelines on dual antiplatelet therapy: JACC guideline comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:2915-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.057
- Costa F, Van Klaveren D, Feres F, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy duration based on ischemic and bleeding risks after coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:741-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.048
- Kandzari DE, Mauri L, Koolen JJ, et al. Ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation (BIOFLOW V): a randomised trial. Lancet 2017;390:1843-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32249-3
- Roguin A, Kandzari DE, Marcusohn E, et al. Subgroup analysis comparing ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in acute coronary syndrome patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:e007331.
- Escaned J, Cao D, Baber U, et al. Ticagrelor monotherapy in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: TWILIGHT-HBR. Eur Heart J 2021;42:4624-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab702