Korean Circulation Journal

The Korean Society of Cardiology (대한심장학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

We Always Have a Choice: Pericardial Versus Porcine Valves for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

  • Hyun Keun Chee (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2021.11.23
  • Accepted : 2021.12.07
  • Published : 2022.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Statistics Korea. Korean Statistical Information Services [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea; 2021 [cited 2021 November 22]. Available from: https://kosis.kr.
  2. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 2006;368:1005-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69208-8
  3. Capodanno D, Petronio AS, Prendergast B, et al. Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2017;38:3382-90. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx303
  4. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2739-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391
  5. Du DT, Lu X, McKean S, et al. Selection of prosthetic aortic valves in the United States among elderly Medicare patients from 2006 to 2015. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019;159:62-9.
  6. Bourguignon T, Lhommet P, El Khoury R, et al. Very long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve in patients aged 50-65 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;49:1462-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv384
  7. Hickey GL, Bridgewater B, Grant SW, et al. National registry data and record linkage to inform postmarket surveillance of prosthetic aortic valve models over 15 years. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177:79-86. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6936
  8. Yap KH, Murphy R, Devbhandari M, Venkateswaran R. Aortic valve replacement: is porcine or bovine valve better? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013;16:361-73. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivs447
  9. Shin HJ, Kim WK, Kim JK, et al. Pericardial versus porcine valves for surgical aortic valve replacement. Korean Circ J 2022;52:136-46. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2021.0223
  10. Lehmann S, Jawad K, Dieterlen MT, et al. Durability and clinical experience using a bovine pericardial prosthetic aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021;161:1742-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.028