참고문헌
- Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 2008;117:1283-91. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743963
- Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019;40:87-165. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
- Patel MR, Calhoon JH, Dehmer GJ, et al. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization in patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:2212-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.001
- van Nunen LX, Zimmermann FM, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015;386:1853-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00057-4
- Zimmermann FM, Ferrara A, Johnson NP, et al. Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial. Eur Heart J 2015;36:3182-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv452
- Xaplanteris P, Fournier S, Pijls NHJ, et al. Five-year outcomes with PCI guided by fractional flow reserve. N Engl J Med 2018;379:250-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1803538
- Parikh RV, Liu G, Plomondon ME, et al. Utilization and outcomes of measuring fractional flow reserve in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:409-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.060
- Driessen RS, Stuijfzand WJ, Raijmakers PG, et al. Effect of plaque burden and morphology on myocardial blood flow and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:499-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.054
- Lee JM, Choi KH, Koo BK, et al. Prognostic implications of plaque characteristics and stenosis severity in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:2413-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.060
- Hwang D, Lee JM, Yang S, et al. Role of post-stent physiological assessment in a risk prediction model after coronary stent implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020;13:1639-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.041
- Hakeem A, Uretsky BF. Role of postintervention fractional flow reserve to improve procedural and clinical outcomes. Circulation 2019;139:694-706. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035837
- Hwang D, Lee JM, Lee HJ, et al. Influence of target vessel on prognostic relevance of fractional flow reserve after coronary stenting. EuroIntervention 2019;15:457-64. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00913
- Rimac G, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, et al. Clinical value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve value: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2017;183:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2016.10.005
- Li SJ, Ge Z, Kan J, et al. Cutoff value and long-term prediction of clinical events by FFR measured immediately after implantation of a drug-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: 1- to 3-year results from the DKCRUSH VII registry study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:986-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.012
- Johnson NP, Toth GG, Lai D, et al. Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve: linking physiologic severity to clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1641-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.973
- Hwang D, Yang S, Zhang J, Koo BK. Physiologic assessment after coronary stent implantation. Korean Circ J 2021;51:189-201. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2020.0548
- Nijjer SS, Petraco R, van de Hoef TP, et al. Change in coronary blood flow after percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to baseline lesion physiology: results of the JUSTIFY-PCI study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:e001715.
- Toth GG, Johnson NP, Jeremias A, et al. Standardization of fractional flow reserve measurements. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:742-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.067
- Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, et al. Standardized end point definitions for coronary intervention trials: the academic research consortium-2 consensus document. Eur Heart J 2018;39:2192-207. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy223
- Hall MA, Holmes G. Benchmarking attribute selection techniques for discrete class data mining. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 2003;15:1437-47. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2003.1245283
- Hamaya R, Mittleman MA, Hoshino M, et al. Prognostic value of prerevascularization fractional flow reserve mediated by the postrevascularization level. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2018162.
- Hanekamp CE, Koolen JJ, Pijls NH, Michels HR, Bonnier HJ. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment. Circulation 1999;99:1015-21. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.99.8.1015
- Fearon WF, Luna J, Samady H, et al. Fractional flow reserve compared with intravascular ultrasound guidance for optimizing stent deployment. Circulation 2001;104:1917-22. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc4101.097539
- Lee JM, Hwang D, Choi KH, et al. Prognostic implications of relative increase and final fractional flow reserve in patients with stent implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:2099-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.07.031
- Jeremias A, Davies JE, Maehara A, et al. Blinded physiological assessment of residual ischemia after successful angiographic percutaneous coronary intervention: the DEFINE PCI study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019;12:1991-2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.05.054
- Kim KH, Doh JH, Koo BK, et al. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:72-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.024
- Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1989-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.066
- Dai N, Hwang D, Lee JM, et al. Association of quantitative flow ratio with lesion severity and its ability to discriminate myocardial ischemia. Korean Circ J 2021;51:126-39. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2020.0375
- Rubimbura V, Guillon B, Fournier S, et al. Quantitative flow ratio virtual stenting and post stenting correlations to post stenting fractional flow reserve measurements from the DOCTORS (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting) study population. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020;96:1145-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28615
- Nijjer SS, Sen S, Petraco R, et al. Pre-angioplasty instantaneous wave-free ratio pullback provides virtual intervention and predicts hemodynamic outcome for serial lesions and diffuse coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:1386-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.06.015