DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance-Based Evaluation of Seismic Design Proposals for RC Ordinary Moment Frames by Spectrum Revision

설계스펙트럼의 개정에 따른 철근콘크리트 보통모멘트골조의 내진성능수준 평가

  • Shim, JungEun (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Insub (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, JunHee (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • 심정은 (연세대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 최인섭 (연세대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 김준희 (연세대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2022.07.09
  • Accepted : 2022.08.09
  • Published : 2022.09.01

Abstract

New buildings have been designed using different seismic design standards that have been revised. However, the seismic performance of existing buildings is evaluated through the same performance evaluation guidelines. Existing buildings may not satisfy the performance targets suggested in the current guidelines, but there are practical limitations to discriminating the existing buildings with poor seismic performance through a full investigation. In this regard, to classify buildings with poor seismic performance according to the applied standard, this study aimed to evaluate performance-based investigation of the seismic design proposals of buildings with different design standards. The target buildings were set as RC ordinary moment frames for office occupancy. Changes in seismic design criteria by period were analyzed, and the design spectrum changes of reinforced concrete ordinary moment resisting frames were compared to analyze the seismic load acting on the building during design. The seismic design plan was derived through structural analysis of the target model, compared the member force and cross-sectional performance, and a preliminary evaluation of the seismic performance was performed to analyze the performance level through DCR. As a result of the seismic performance analysis through the derived design, the reinforced concrete ordinary moment frame design based on AIK 2000 has an insufficient seismic performance level, so buildings built before 2005 are likely to need seismic reinforcement.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 2021년도 정부(교육과학기술부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(Grant No. NRF-2021R1A2C2007064).

References

  1. Park JH, Lee SH, Kim DK. Revision of earthquake loads included in KDS 41 17 00. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 2019 May;63(5):20-25.
  2. Park HG, Yu E. Introduction to seismic design in korean building code. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 2019 May;63(5):15-19.
  3. KALIS. Guidelines for seismic performance evaluation of existing buildings. Korea Authority of Land and Infrastructure Safety. c2021.
  4. Han SW. Korean seismic design code and application status. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 2011 May;55(5):22-26.
  5. MCT. Rules on structural standards for buildings (AIK 1988). The Ministry of Construction & Transportation. c1988.
  6. AIK. Standards for building loads and analysis (AIK 2000). The Architectural Institute of Korea. c2000.
  7. AIK. Korean building code and commentary (KBC 2005). The Architectural Institute of Korea. c2005.
  8. AIK. Korean building code and commentary (KBC 2009). The Architectural Institute of Korea. c2009.
  9. AIK. Korean building code and commentary (KBC 2016). The Architectural Institute of Korea. c2016.
  10. MLIT. Seismic design standards for buildings (KDS 41 17 00). The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. c2018.
  11. MLIT. Development of seismic performance evaluation for earthquake loss assessment of buildings. Report No. TRKO201900002020. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport. c2019.
  12. Beak W, Choi J. Analysis of the effect of the revised ground amplification factor on the macro liquefaction assessment method. Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society. 2020 Feb;36(2):5-15. https://doi.org/10.7843/KGS.2020.36.2.5
  13. SI. Changes in Seoul as an Indicator. The Seoul Institute. 2015;3:146-147.