Human Ecology Research

  • 제60권3호
  • /
  • Pages.407-427
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2982-5725(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2982-6608(eISSN)
대한가정학회 (The Korean Home Economics Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

프레이리(Freire) 교육론이 중등학교 가정과교육에 주는 시사점 및 실천방안

Implications of Freire's Education Theory and Corresponding Action Plans for Secondary School Home Economics Education

  • 투고 : 2022.06.09
  • 심사 : 2022.07.21
  • 발행 : 2022.08.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to explore the implications of Freire's education theory for secondary school Home Economics Education (HEedu). We conducted a review of books written by Freire and classified the characteristics of his education theory into 9 categories. Based on these categories, we concretely explored the forms in which Freire's education theory could be applied in this area of education through interviews with Home Economics (HE) teachers. We also searched for activities that can be carried out by HEedu agents and the support that can be given by social institutions. The implications of Freire's education theory for HEedu are that education should exhibit love and respect for human beings, be ethically and democratically responsible, enable people to dream as well as hope, support consciousness and praxis by reflection, stimulate epistemological curiosity in learners' lives and experiences, promote subjectivity, autonomy and self-reliance, engage in dialogue to bring about a change in relationships rather than viewing dialogue as a skill, and stimulate political engagement. Freire's education theory therefore has multiple implications for the purpose, mission, and content of education, teaching methods and perspectives, and directions regarding the role of HE teachers. The results are expected to provide practical assistance in developing a persuasive curriculum for HEedu that can help learners restore subjectivity and love for human beings and their society by expanding the horizons of HEedu philosophy from the critical science of Habermas to Freire's education theory.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, I. K. (2011). The meaning and implications of the art education for social justice. Journal of Art Education Research Review, 25(2), 295-320.
  2. Baek, Y. S. (2013). Visual Culture Education and the Implications of Paulo Freire's Literacy Education Program. Art and Education, 14(2), 81-99.
  3. Brown, M. M., & Paolucci, B. (1979). Home economics: A definition. Washington DC: American Home Economics Association.
  4. Brown, M. M. (1986). Home Economics: A practical or technical science? In Laster, J. F. & Dohner, R. E.(Eds.), Vocational Home Economics Curriculum: State of the field(39-55). Illinois: Bennett & McKnight.
  5. Brown, M. M. (1993). Philosophical studies of home economics in the United States. East Lansing MI: Michigan State University.
  6. Chae, J. H., Park, M. J., Kim, S. G., & Han, J. (2017). Home economics education (2nd edition). Paju: Gyomunsa Co.
  7. Freire, P. (2000). Freire's theory of teachers (Education and Culture Research Association, Trans.). Seoul: Morning Dew. (Original work published 1998).
  8. Freire, P. (2002). Pedagogy of hope (Education and Culture Research Association, Trans.). Seoul: Morning Dew. (Original work published 1992).
  9. Freire, P. (2007). Ppedagogy of freedom (Person to person, Trans.). Seoul: Morning Dew. (Original work published 1998).
  10. Freire, P. (2009). Pedagogy (K, T, Nam. Trans.). Seoul: Greenbee Publishing House. (Original work published 1970, 1993).
  11. Hong, E. K. (2010). Paulo Freire meets Korean Education. Seoul: Learning Test.
  12. Jo, S. H. (2006). Freire's dialogue education theory. Journal of Education Research, 27(1), 21-38.
  13. Ju, S. E., & Yoo, T. M. (2015). Integrative Home Economics curriculum development from a critical science perspective through deliberation. Family and Environment Research, 53 (4), 447-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.6115/fer.2015.036
  14. Kim, B. H. (2002). Freire's 「Pedagogy」 and 「Pedagogy of hope」: Implications for special education. Journal of Special Education : theory and practice, 3(3), 133-141.
  15. Lee, E. S. (2015). A re-examination of Freire's theory of education as a critique of neoliberal education (Unpublished master's thesis). Korea National University of Education, Cheong-ju, Korea.
  16. Ministry of Education (2015). Practical Art(Technology.Home Economics) Curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice No. 2015-74 [Separate Book 10]. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  17. Park, J. H. (2002). A Comparative study of Paulo Freire and alternative education center (Unpublished master's thesis). Korea National University of Education, Cheong-ju, Korea.
  18. Song, H. S. (2003). Critical literacy education of Freire and Geography Education. Journal of the Korean Society of Geographic and Environmental Education, 11(3), 47-64.
  19. The Korean Law Information Center (2022). Framework act on education. from https://www.law.go.kr/
  20. Thomas, R. G. (1997). Thinking for ethical action in families: Family and consumer sciences meanings. In J. F, Laster and R, G Thomas. Thinking for ethical action in families and communities. Yearbook 17(pp. 13-27). Peoria, H: McGraw-Hill, Glencoe.
  21. Vincenti, V. B. (1993). Professional identity: Interferences within. In E. P. Anderson &,V. L. Clark (Eds.), Marketing Home Economics: Issues and practices. Home Economics teacher education: Yearbook 13(pp. 41-62). Teacher education section. American Home Economics Association.
  22. Yang J. S., & Yoo, T. M. (2017). The ideal portrait of human being pursuing in Home Economics Education from a critical science perspective. Family and Environment Research, 55(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2017.006
  23. Yoo, T. M. (1992). International comparison of curriculum - The importance of Establishing a Home Economics Philosophy for Reilluminating the Direction of Home Economics and Education. Paper presented at the 4th Korean Home Economics Education Association, 43-50. Seoul, Korea.
  24. Yoo, T. M., & Lee, S. H. (2010). Practical problem-based Home Economics Class-theory and practice. Seoul: BookKorea.