Hip & pelvis

  • 제34권2호
  • /
  • Pages.115-121
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2287-3260(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3279(eISSN)
대한고관절학회 (The Korean Hip Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Wear Rate and Survivorship in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Third-generation Ceramic Head on a Conventional Polyethylene Liner: A Minimum of 15-year Follow-up

  • Bum-Jin Shim (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Sung-Jin Park (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center) ;
  • Chan Ho Park (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Medical Center)
  • 투고 : 2021.09.15
  • 심사 : 2022.01.29
  • 발행 : 2022.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the wear and survival rates of third-generation ceramic heads on a conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene liner. Materials and Methods: A total of 160 hips (147 patients with a mean age of 55.9 years) who underwent total hip arthroplasty using the third-generation ceramic head on a conventional polyethylene liner from March 1998 to August 2003 were reviewed retrospectively. Evaluation of the wear rate for 56 hips (49 patients) followed-up for at least 15 years was performed using the PolyWare program version 8 (Draftware Developers, USA). The Kaplan-Meier survivorship was also evaluated. Results: Linear wear and volumetric wear rates were 0.11±0.47 mm/year and 32.75±24.50 mm3/year, respectively. Nine revisions were performed during the follow-up period because of cup or stem loosening. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate, using cup revision or total revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) as the endpoint of analysis, was 93.7% at 15 years and 73.6% at 20 years. Conclusion: Because all revisions were performed between 15 and 20 years in our study, surgeons should pay greater attention to patients who underwent THA with ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing from 15 years postoperatively. Contemporary alumina ceramic on highly cross-linked polyethylene could certainly be a good alternative bearing couple providing better longevity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007;370:1508-19.
  2. Rajaee SS, Campbell JC, Mirocha J, Paiement GD. Increasing burden of total hip arthroplasty revisions in patients between 45 and 64 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:449-58.
  3. Lachiewicz PF, Kleeman LT, Seyler T. Bearing surfaces for total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26:45-57.
  4. Zagra L, Gallazzi E. Bearing surfaces in primary total hip arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3:217-24.
  5. Heckmann ND, Sivasundaram L, Stefl MD, Kang HP, Basler ET, Lieberman JR. Total hip arthroplasty bearing surface trends in the United States from 2007 to 2014: the rise of ceramic on polyethylene. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:1757-63.e1.
  6. Grieco PW, Pascal S, Newman JM, et al. New alternate bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty: a review of the current literature. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018;9:7-16.
  7. Kim YH, Park JW. Eighteen-year results of cementless THA with alumina-on-HXLPE bearings in patients <30 years old: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102:1255-9.
  8. Yoon PW, Yoo JJ, Kim Y, Yoo S, Lee S, Kim HJ. The epidemiology and national trends of bearing surface usage in primary total hip arthroplasty in Korea. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016;8:29-37.
  9. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;(121):20-32.
  10. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;(141):17-27.
  11. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Harris WH, Poss R, Muller ME, Sledge CB. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:161-8. Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:952.
  12. Varnum C. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty- implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome. Dan Med J. 2017;64:B5350.
  13. Sukur E, Akman YE, Ozturkmen Y, Kucukdurmaz F. Particle disease: a current review of the biological mechanisms in periprosthetic osteolysis after hip arthroplasty. Open Orthop J. 2016;10:241-51.
  14. Peters RM, Van Steenbergen LN, Stevens M, Rijk PC, Bulstra SK, Zijlstra WP. The effect of bearing type on the outcome of total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2018;89:163-9.
  15. Milosev I, Kovac S, Trebse R, Levasic V, Pisot V. Comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1756-63.
  16. Min BW, Cho CH, Son ES, Lee KJ, Lee SW, Song KS. Highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35:805-10.
  17. Skinner JA, Haddad FS. Ceramics in total hip arthroplasty: a bearing solution? Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B:993-5.
  18. Howard DP, Wall PDH, Fernandez MA, Parsons H, Howard PW. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing fractures in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of data from the National Joint Registry. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B:1012-9.
  19. Kim MW, Kim SM, Chung YY. Total hip arthroplasty using ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces: long-term assessment of squeaking sounds. Hip Pelvis. 2018;30:18-22.
  20. Solarino G, Zagra L, Piazzolla A, Morizio A, Vicenti G, Moretti B. Results of 200 consecutive ceramic-on-ceramic cementless hip arthroplasties in patients up to 50 years of age: a 5-24 years of follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(7S):S232-7.
  21. Higuchi Y, Hasegawa Y, Seki T, Komatsu D, Ishiguro N. Significantly lower wear of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings than metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings: a 10-to 14-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:1246-50.
  22. Dong YL, Li T, Xiao K, Bian YY, Weng XS. Ceramic on ceramic or ceramic-on-polyethylene for total hip arthroplasty: a systemic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015;128:1223-31.
  23. Amanatullah DF, Landa J, Strauss EJ, Garino JP, Kim SH, Di Cesare PE. Comparison of surgical outcomes and implant wear between ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene articulations in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(6 Suppl):72-7.
  24. Kim HS, Park JW, Ha JH, Lee YK, Ha YC, Koo KH. Third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a 10- to 16-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Published online November 15, 2021; doi:10.2106/JBJS.20.00720.
  25. Mutimer J, Devane PA, Adams K, Horne JG. Highly crosslinked polyethylene reduces wear in total hip arthroplasty at 5 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:3228-33.
  26. Lee YK, Lee JC, Ha YC, Koo KH. Effect of neck length on third-generation ceramic head failure; finite element and retrieval analysis. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19:587-97.
  27. Lee YK, Lim JY, Ha YC, Kim TY, Jung WH, Koo KH. Preventing ceramic liner fracture after Delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021;141:1155-62.
  28. Traina F, Tassinari E, De Fine M, Bordini B, Toni A. Revision of ceramic hip replacements for fracture of a ceramic component: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:e147.
  29. Blumenfeld TJ, McKellop HA, Schmalzried TP, Billi F. Fracture of a cross-linked polyethylene liner: a multifactorial issue. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:666.e5-8.
  30. Piriou P, Ouenzerfi G, Migaud H, Renault E, Massi F, Serrault M. A numerical model to reproduce squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Influence of design and material. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(4 Suppl):S229-34.