기술혁신연구 (Journal of Technology Innovation)

기술경영경제학회 (Korea Society for Innovation Managemetn & Economics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

자유공모형 국가연구개발 과제의 특성 및 효과성 분석 : 중소기업 R&D를 중심으로

The Performance of Grant-type Government R&D Project: Focusing on SME's R&D

  • 홍슬기 (연세대학교 기술경영학협동과정) ;
  • 배성주 (연세대학교 경영대학)
  • 투고 : 2022.09.30
  • 심사 : 2022.11.13
  • 발행 : 2022.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 중소기업 혁신 지원 전략이 시장 중심의 혁신을 유도하는 방향으로 전환되면서 중소기업이 수행하는 정부 R&D의 세부과제 지원 유형 중 자유공모형 과제의 비중이 높아지고 있다. 본 연구는 이처럼 증가하고 있는 자유공모형 과제의 특성과 효과성에 대해 이론적으로 살펴보고 실증분석을 통해 어떤 조건에서 자유공모형 과제가 될 가능성이 높아지는지, 성과 측면에서는 어떠한 차이점이 있는지 알아보았다. 먼저 시장수요 중심으로의 국가 R&D전략 전환과 수요견인 혁신 관점에서 세부과제 지원 유형 중 자유공모형 과제의 특성과 의미에 대해 살펴보고, 자원기반 관점으로 자유공모형 과제가 성과측면에서 유리할 수 있다는 것을 이해하였다. 그 후 로짓분석과 성향점수매칭법 등 실증분석을 통해 자유공모형 과제가 될 확률이 높아지는 과제 특성과 수행기업의 특성을 밝히고, 자유공모형 과제가 연구비 1억원 당 더 많은 혁신 성과를 나타낸다는 결과를 얻었다.

As the strategy to support SMEs' innovation has shifted to induce market-oriented innovation, the Korean government increasingly invests in grant-type R&D projects proposed by SME firms. This study reveals the characteristics of grant-type R&D projects proposed by SME firms through a transition of national R&D strategy and demand-pull innovation perspectives. This study also examines the differences between grant-type R&D projects proposed by firms and R&D projects led by the government through logit-analysis and propensity score matching methods. As a result, we found that a national R&D project for SMEs yields better innovation performance when the project is proposed by a company than led by the government.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 과학기술정보통신부 (2018). 「국가기술혁신체계(NIS) 고도화를 위한 국가R&D 혁신방안」.
  2. 과학기술정보통신부 (2018). 「제4차 과학기술기본계획」.
  3. 김용정.이흥권 (2012). 「기초연구사업 특성과 논문 질의상관관계 분석 및 시사점」. KISTEP 이슈 페이퍼.
  4. 이병철 (2021). 「국가R&D사업 연구성과활용 체계 분석」. 국회예산정책처 연구보고서.
  5. 산업통상자원부 (2014). 「제6차 산업기술혁신계획」.
  6. 소민호 외 (2020). 「과학기술 논문성과 분석연구(2005-2019) 」 . KISTEP 위탁연구보고서.
  7. 오승환.심동녘.김규남 (2015), "벤처인증정책과 이노비즈인증정책의 중복효과에 대한 연구: ICT 산업을 중심으로", 「기술혁신학회지」, 제18권 제2호, pp. 358-386.
  8. 오승환.장필성 (2019), "정부 R&D 지원이 기업의 고용에 미치는 효과에 대한 연구", 「한국혁신학회지」, 제14권 제4호, pp. 201-234.
  9. 이병문.이혁.오승환 (2022), "고성장기업의 혁신활동 및 혁신성과에 관한 연구 : 국내 제조기업을 대상으로", 「한국혁신학회지」, 제17권 제2호, pp. 195-216.
  10. 이재혁.양지원 (2015), "연구개발 (R&D) 투자를 통한 경쟁력 창출: 경로의존성 및 자원특성의 역할", 「전략경영연구」, 제18권 제3호, pp. 71-96. https://doi.org/10.17786/JSM.2015.18.3.004
  11. 전승표 외 (2022), "중소기업 R&D 활동의 변화와 재정지원 정책 효과 분석", 「기술혁신학회지」, 제25권 제2호, pp. 247-274.
  12. 중소벤처기업부 (2019). 「제4차 중소기업기술혁신촉진계획」.
  13. 홍슬기 외 (2020). 「연구자중심 R&D 활성화를 위한 과제공모형태별 사업 특성 분석 연구」. KISTEP 연구보고서.
  14. KISTEP (2019). 「국가연구개발사업 조사분석」.
  15. KISTEP (2020). 「국가연구개발사업 조사분석」.
  16. KISTEP (2021). 「국가연구개발사업 조사분석」.
  17. Bae, Seoung Hun, et al. (2013), "The innovation policy of nanotechnology development and convergence for the new Korean government." Journal of nanoparticle research, Vol. 15, No. 11, pp. 1-15.
  18. Balachandra, R. and J. H. Friar (1997), "Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework." IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 276-287. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.618169
  19. Brown, R. (1992), "Manageing the S curves of innovation." The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858629210035418
  20. Cantner, Uwe, and Andreas Pyka (2001), "Classifying technology policy from an evolutionary perspective." Research policy, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 759-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00104-9
  21. Chiang, Jong-Tsong (1991), "From 'mission-oriented'to 'diffusion-oriented'paradigm: the new trend of US industrial technology policy." Technovation, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 339-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(91)90017-X
  22. Choi, Hyung-Sup (1986), "Science and technology policies for industrialization of developing countries." Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 225-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(86)80001-4
  23. Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. A. (1990), "Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation." Administrative science quarterly, pp. 128-152.
  24. Conesa, Emmanuelle (1998), "Organizational Dynamics and the Evolutionary Dilemma between Diversity and Standardization in Mission-Oriented Research Programmes: An Illustration." Interim Report of International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
  25. Del Canto, J. G. and Gonzalez, I. S. (1999), "A resource-based analysis of the factors determining a firm's R&D activities." Research Policy, Vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 891-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00029-3
  26. Di Stefano, Giada, Alfonso Gambardella, and Gianmario Verona (2012), "Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions." Research policy, Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 1283-1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.021
  27. Ergas, Henry (1986), Does technology policy matter? Technology and Global industry.
  28. Forbes, Naushad, and David Wield (2000), "Managing R&D in technology-followers." Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 9, pp. 1095-1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00071-2
  29. Goto, Akira (2000), "Japan's national innovation system: Current status and problems." Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/16.2.103
  30. Holland, Paul W. (1986), "Statistics and causal inference." Journal of the American statistical Association, Vol. 81, No. 396, pp. 945-960. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354
  31. Jun, Seung-Pyo, Ju Hwan Seo, and Jong-Ku Son (2013), "A study of the SME Technology Roadmapping Program to strengthen the R&D planning capability of Korean SMEs." Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 80, No. 5, pp. 1002-1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.022
  32. Kim, Ji-hyun, Sung Joo Bae, and Jae-Suk Yang (2014), "Government roles in evaluation and arrangement of R&D consortia." Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 8, No. 8, pp. 202-215.
  33. Kim, Jungho, Chang-Yang Lee, and Yunok Cho (2016), "Technological diversification, core-technology competence, and firm growth." Research Policy, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.005
  34. Lee, Keun, and Chaisung Lim (2001), "Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries." Research policy, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 459-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00088-3
  35. Lee, Chong-Ouk (1988), "The role of the government and R&D infrastructure for technology development." Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 33-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(88)90054-6
  36. Moen, Jarle (2019), "Corporate returns to subsidised R&D projects: direct grants vs. tax credit financing." International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 84-101. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2019.096550
  37. Nemet, Gregory F. (2009), "Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change." Research policy, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 700-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.004
  38. OECD (2020). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Scoreboard.
  39. Pavitt, K. (1984), "Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory." Research policy, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 343-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
  40. Peters, Michael, et al. (2012), "The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change-Does the locus of policies matter?." Research policy, Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 1296-1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.004
  41. Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990), "The core competence of the corporation." Harvard Business Review, Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 79-91.
  42. Rothwell, R. (1992). "SUCCESSFUL INDUSTRIAL-INNOVATION - CRITICAL FACTORS FOR THE 1990S." R&D Management, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 221-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1992.tb00812.x
  43. Rosenbaum, Paul R., and Donald B. Rubin (1983), "The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects." Biometrika, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
  44. Rosenbaum, Paul R. (2002), "Overt bias in observational studies." Observational studies, pp. 71-104.
  45. Shin, Taeyoung, and Hoagy Kim (1994), "Research foresight activities and technological development in Korea: science and technology policies in national R&D programs." Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(94)90061-2
  46. Seo, Ju Hwan, and Daemyeong Cho (2020), "Analysis of the effect of R&D planning support for smes using latent growth modeling." Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 1018.
  47. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997), "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management." Strategic management journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  48. Utterback, James M. (1974), "Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology." Science, Vol. 183, No. 4125, pp. 620-626. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.183.4125.620
  49. Wernerfelt, B. (1984), "A resource-based view of the firm." Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207