DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Practical Experiences of Unsuccessful Hemostasis with Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent Placement for Post-Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Bleeding

  • Michihiro Yoshida (Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Tadahisa Inoue (Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Medical University) ;
  • Itaru Naitoh (Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kazuki Hayashi (Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Yasuki Hori (Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Makoto Natsume (Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Naoki Atsuta (Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Hiromi Kataoka (Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2020.08.07
  • Accepted : 2020.09.22
  • Published : 2022.01.30

Abstract

We reviewed 7 patients with unsuccessful endoscopic hemostasis using covered self-expandable metal stent (CSEMS) placement for post-endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) bleeding. ES with a medium incision was performed in 6 and with a large incision in 1 patient. All but 1 of them (86%) showed delayed bleeding, warranting second endoscopic therapies followed by CSEMS placement 1-5 days after the initial ES. Subsequent CSEMS placement did not achieve complete hemostasis in any of the patients. Lateral-side incision lines (3 or 9 o'clock) had more frequent bleeding points (71%) than oral-side incision lines (11-12 o'clock; 29%). Additional endoscopic hemostatic procedures with hemostatic forceps, hypertonic saline epinephrine, or hemoclip achieved excellent hemostasis, resulting in complete hemostasis in all patients. These experiences provide an alert: CSEMS placement is not an ultimate treatment for post-ES bleeding, despite its effectiveness. The lateral-side of the incision line, as well as the oral-most side, should be carefully examined for bleeding points, even after the CSEMS placement.

Keywords

References

  1. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909-918.
  2. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:1-10.
  3. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:417-423.
  4. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA, et al. Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:32-47.
  5. Itoi T, Yasuda I, Doi S, Mukai T, Kurihara T, Sofuni A. Endoscopic hemostasis using covered metallic stent placement for uncontrolled post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding. Endoscopy 2011;43:369-372.
  6. Canena J, Liberato M, Horta D, Romao C, Coutinho A. Short-term stenting using fully covered self-expandable metal stents for treatment of refractory biliary leaks, postsphincterotomy bleeding, and perforations. Surg Endosc 2013;27:313-324.
  7. Cochrane J, Schlepp G. Comparing endoscopic intervention against fully covered self-expanding metal stent placement for post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleed (CEASE Study). Endosc Int Open 2016;4:E1261-E1264.
  8. Inoue T, Ibusuki M, Kitano R, et al. Early covered self-expandable metal stent placement is effective for massive post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding. Dig Dis Sci 2020;65:3324-3331.
  9. Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:446-454.
  10. Iwasaki E, Itoi T, Kanai T. Metal stent for refractory post-ES bleeding: is this the ultimate treatment modality? Endosc Int Open 2016;4:E1265-E1266.