Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (한국간담췌외과학회지)

The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (한국간담췌외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage and percutaneous catheter drainage of postoperative fluid collection after pancreaticoduodenectomy

  • Da Hee Woo (Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Jae Hoon Lee (Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Ye Jong Park (Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Woo Hyung Lee (Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Ki Byung Song (Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Dae Wook Hwang (Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Song Cheol Kim (Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2022.03.15
  • Accepted : 2022.05.26
  • Published : 2022.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims: Postoperative fluid collection is a common complication of pancreatic resection without clear management guidelines. This study aimed to compare outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided trans-gastric drainage and percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in patients who experienced this adverse event after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Methods: Demographic and clinical data and intervention outcomes of 53 patients who underwent drainage procedure (EUS-guided, n = 32; PCD, n = 21) for fluid collection after PD between January 2015 and June 2019 in our tertiary referral center were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Prior to drainage, 83.0% had leukocytosis and 92.5% presented with one or more of the following signs or symptoms: fever (69.8%), abdominal pain (69.8%), and nausea/vomiting (17.0%). Within 8 weeks of drainage, 77.4% showed a diameter decrease of more than 50% (87.5% in EUS vs. 66.7% in PCD, p = 0.09). Post-procedural intravenous antibiotics were used for an average of 8.1 ± 4.3 days and 12.4 ± 7.4 days for EUS group and PCD group, respectively (p = 0.01). The EUS group had a shorter post-procedural hospital stay than the PCD group (9.8 ± 1.1 vs. 15.8 ± 2.2 days, p < 0.01). However, the two groups showed no statistically significant difference in technical or clinical success rate, reintervention rate, or adverse event rate. Conclusions: EUS-guided drainage and PCD are both safe and effective methods for managing fluid collection after PD. However, EUS-guided drainage can shorten hospital stay and duration of intravenous antibiotics use.

Keywords

References

  1. Morgan DE. Imaging after pancreatic surgery. Radiol Clin North Am 2012;50:529-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2012.03.004
  2. Berberat PO, Friess H, Kleeff J, Uhl W, Buchler MW. Prevention and treatment of complications in pancreatic cancer surgery. Dig Surg 1999;16:327-336. https://doi.org/10.1159/000018743
  3. Halloran CM, Ghaneh P, Bosonnet L, Hartley MN, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP. Complications of pancreatic cancer resection. Dig Surg 2002;19:138-146. https://doi.org/10.1159/000052029
  4. Wellner UF, Sick O, Olschewski M, Adam U, Hopt UT, Keck T. Randomized controlled single-center trial comparing pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:1686-1695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1940-4
  5. Maehira H, Iida H, Matsunaga T, Yasukawa D, Mori H, Miyake T, et al. The location of perianastomotic fluid collection predicts postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020;405:325-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01880-5
  6. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Geschwind JF, Mitchell SE, Venbrux AC, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: role of interventional radiologists in managing patients and complications. J Gastrointest Surg 2003;7:209-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00193-2
  7. Zink SI, Soloff EV, White RR, Clary BM, Tyler DS, Pappas TN, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: frequency and outcome of post-operative imaging-guided percutaneous drainage. Abdom Imaging 2009;34:767-771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9455-x
  8. Jacobson BC, Baron TH, Adler DG, Davila RE, Egan J, Hirota WK, et al. ASGE guideline: the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and the management of cystic lesions and inflammatory fluid collections of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:363-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02779-8
  9. Varadarajulu S, Christein JD, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER, Wilcox CM. Prospective randomized trial comparing EUS and EGD for transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2008;68:1102-1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.028
  10. Grimm H, Binmoeller KF, Soehendra N. Endosonography-guided drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst. Gastrointest Endosc 1992;38:170-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(92)70384-8
  11. Binmoeller KF, Seifert H, Walter A, Soehendra N. Transpapillary and transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:219-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70095-1
  12. Giovannini M, Pesenti C, Rolland AL, Moutardier V, Delpero JR. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts or pancreatic abscesses using a therapeutic echo endoscope. Endoscopy 2001;33:473-477. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-14967
  13. Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Salvia R, Butturini G, Sartori N, et al. Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 2005;242:767-771, discussion 771-773. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000189124.47589.6d
  14. Fernandez-Cruz L, Cosa R, Blanco L, Lopez-Boado MA, Astudillo E. Pancreatogastrostomy with gastric partition after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy versus conventional pancreatojejunostomy: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg 2008;248:930-938. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818fefc7
  15. Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Weerts J, Feryn T, Roeyen G, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:655-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70126-8
  16. Baron TH, Harewood GC, Morgan DE, Yates MR. Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:7-17. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2002.125106
  17. Cahen D, Rauws E, Fockens P, Weverling G, Huibregtse K, Bruno M. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: long-term outcome and procedural factors associated with safe and successful treatment. Endoscopy 2005;37:977-983. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-870336
  18. Hookey LC, Debroux S, Delhaye M, Arvanitakis M, Le Moine O, Deviere J. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections in 116 patients: a comparison of etiologies, drainage techniques, and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:635-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.028
  19. Kwon YM, Gerdes H, Schattner MA, Brown KT, Covey AM, Getrajdman GI, et al. Management of peripancreatic fluid collections following partial pancreatectomy: a comparison of percutaneous versus EUS-guided drainage. Surg Endosc 2013;27:2422-2427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2752-z
  20. Song KB, Kwon J, Lee YJ, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Shin SH, et al. The treatment indication and optimal management of fluid collection after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 2019;33:3314-3324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06621-w
  21. Varadarajulu S, Trevino JM, Christein JD. EUS for the management of peripancreatic fluid collections after distal pancreatectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70:1260-1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.06.007
  22. Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM, Christein JD. EUS-guided therapy for management of peripancreatic fluid collections after distal pancreatectomy in 20 consecutive patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:418-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1242
  23. Azeem N, Baron TH, Topazian MD, Zhong N, Fleming CJ, Kendrick ML. Outcomes of endoscopic and percutaneous drainage of pancreatic fluid collections arising after pancreatic tail resection. J Am Coll Surg 2012;215:177-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.03.015
  24. Gupta T, Lemmers A, Tan D, Ibrahim M, Le Moine O, Deviere J. EUS-guided transmural drainage of postoperative collections. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:1259-1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.07.037
  25. Tilara A, Gerdes H, Allen P, Jarnagin W, Kingham P, Fong Y, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage of postoperative pancreatic collections. J Am Coll Surg 2014;218:33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.001
  26. Al Efishat M, Attiyeh MA, Eaton AA, Gonen M, Covey AM, D'Angelica MI, et al. Endoscopic versus percutaneous drainage of post-operative peripancreatic fluid collections following pancreatic resection. HPB (Oxford) 2019;21:434-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2018.08.010