DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A comparative study on analgesic and non-analgesic outcomes of inter pleural analgesia compared to thoracic epidural analgesia in open pancreatico-duodenectomy

  • Lu Yao (Division of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust) ;
  • Niroshini Rajaretnam (Division of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust) ;
  • Natalie Smith (Division of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust) ;
  • Lisa Massey (Division of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust) ;
  • Somaiah Aroori (Division of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust)
  • Received : 2021.10.28
  • Accepted : 2021.12.29
  • Published : 2022.08.31

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is an established analgesic method in open Kausch-Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy (KWPD). Although, it can cause hemodynamic instability and neurological complications. Inter pleural analgesia (IPA) is an alternative option. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of IPA versus TEA after KWPD. Methods: We retrospectively studied the efficacy of IPA against TEA in patients, operated by a single surgeon. The primary outcome was the analgesic efficacy and secondary outcomes were analgesia-related complications, inotrope use, and duration. Results: Forty patients (TEA, 22; IPA, 18) were included. Both groups were well matched for patient characteristics, type, and duration of surgery. TEA was associated with higher analgesia-related complications (n = 8, 36.4% vs. n = 1, 5.6%; p = 0.027). TEA complications included analgesia not working (n = 4), leakage (n = 2), refractory hemodynamic instability (n = 1), and lower limb anaesthesia (n = 1). One patient in the IPA group encountered leakage. TEA was associated with longer inotrope requirement (35 vs. 18 hours; p = 0.047). There was no significant difference in intensive care unit (ITU) admission rate (81.8% vs. 77.8%; p > 0.999), median ITU stay (3 vs. 2 days, p = 0.385), or hospital stay (11 days in both groups). Conclusions: In open KWPD, IPA is not inferior to TEA in its efficacy of pain control. IPA was associated with less analgesia-related complications and shorter inotrope requirements. However, this was a small retrospective study. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to study the effectiveness of IPA.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Mr. Muhammed Abdalkoddus and Professor Shangming Zhou for assisting with the statistical analysis and the Plymouth University Hospital Hepto-Pancreatico-Biliary performance team for obtaining the patient list.

References

  1. White PF, Kehlet H, Neal JM, Schricker T, Carr DB, Carli F. The role of the anesthesiologist in fast-track surgery: from multimodal analgesia to perioperative medical care. Anesth Analg 2007;104:1380-1396.
  2. Manassero A, Bossolasco M, Carrega M, Coletta G. Postoperative thoracic epidural analgesia: adverse events from a single-center series of 3126 patients. Local Reg Anesth 2020;13:111-119.
  3. Phillips S, Dedic-Hagan J, Baxter DF, Van der Wall H, Falk GL. A novel technique of paravertebral thoracic and preperitoneal analgesia enhances early recovery after oesophagectomy. World J Surg 2018;42:1787-1791.
  4. Cheng G, Ilfeld B. A review of postoperative analgesia for breast cancer surgery. Pain Manag 2016;6:603-618.
  5. Yu S, Valencia M, Roques V, Aljure O. Regional analgesia for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. J Card Surg 2019;34:1289-1296.
  6. Murphy D. Interpleural analgesia. Br J Anaesth 1993;71:426-434.
  7. Yildirim V, Akay H, Bingol H, Bolcal C, Oz K, Kaya E, et al. Interpleural versus epidural analgesia with ropivacaine for postthoracotomy pain and respiratory function. J Clin Anesth 2007;19:506-511.
  8. Dhanjal S, Shannon C. Interpleural analgesia [Internet]. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 14]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK526020/.
  9. Regional Anaesthesia-UK. Stop before you block [Internet]. London: Regional Anaesthesia-UK 2011 [cited 2021 Sep 6]. Available from: https://www.ra-uk.org/index.php/stop-before-you-block.
  10. Manion S, Brennan T. Thoracic epidural analgesia and acute pain management. Anesthesiology 2011;115:181-188.
  11. Lassen K, Coolsen M, Slim K, Carli F, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Schafer M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. World J Surg 2013;37:240-258.
  12. Akter N, Ratnayake B, Joh DB, Chan SJ, Bonner E, Pandanaboyana S. Postoperative pain relief after pancreatic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis of analgesic modalities. World J Surg 2021;45:3165-3173.
  13. Perrin J, Ratnayake B, Wells C, Windsor JA, Loveday BPT, MacLennan N, et al. Epidural versus transabdominal wall catheters: a comparative study of outcomes after pancreatic resection. J Surg Res 2021;259:473-479.
  14. Mehta Y, Swaminathan M, Mishra Y, Trehan N. A comparative evaluation of intrapleural and thoracic epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1998;12:162-165.
  15. Luchette F, Radafshar S, Kaiser R, Flynn W, Hassett J. Prospective evaluation of epidural versus intrapleural catheters for analgesia in chest wall trauma. J Trauma 1994;36:865-869; discussion 869-870.
  16. Brockmeier V, Moen H, Karlsson B, Fjeld N, Reiestad F, Steen P. Interpleural or thoracic epidural analgesia for pain after thoracotomy. A double blind study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994;38:317-321.
  17. Chang S, Palavecino M, Wray C, Kishi Y, Pisters PW, Vauthey JN. Modified Makuuchi incision for foregut procedures. Arch Surg 2010;145:281-284.
  18. Pandit N, Awale L, Adhikary S, Banerjee JK, Ghosh S, Kulkarni S, et al. Modified Makuuchi incision for major upper abdominal surgeries. Pol Przegl Chir 2019;91:15-19.
  19. Toledano RD, Van de Velde M. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia [Internet]. New York: NYSORA 2017 [cited 2021 Sep 7]. Available from: https://www.nysora.com/regional-anesthesia-for-specific-surgical-procedures/abdomen/epidural-anesthesia-analgesia/.
  20. Clemente A, Carli F. The physiological effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia on the cardiovascular, respiratory and gastrointestinal systems. Minerva Anestesiol 2008;74:549-563.
  21. Casey P, Chaudhury MP, Khan A, Amin J, Afzal A, Corallo C, et al. The impact of perioperative inotropes on the incidence of pancreatic leak following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2019;23:392-396.
  22. Williams N, O'Connell P, McCaskie A. Bailey & Love's short practice of surgery. 27th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2018.
  23. Spronk P, Zandstra D, Ince C. Norepinephrine compromises intestinal microvascular perfusion? Intensive Care Med 2004;30:173-174; author reply 175.
  24. Guo S, Dipietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res 2010;89:219-229.
  25. British Broadcasting Corporation. Intensive care 'disaster' warning [Internet]. London: BBC 2010 [cited 2021 Mar 19]. Available from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-11503873.