DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Korean Surgical Practice Guideline for Pancreatic Cancer 2022: A summary of evidence-based surgical approaches

  • Seung Eun Lee (Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Sung-Sik Han (Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Chang Moo Kang (Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Wooil Kwon (Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kwang Yeol Paik (Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Ki Byung Song (Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Jae Do Yang (Department of Surgery, Jeonbuk National University Medical School) ;
  • Jun Chul Chung (Department of Surgery, Soon Chun Hyang University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chi-Young Jeong (Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Sun-Whe Kim (Department of Surgery, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Committee of the Korean Surgical Practice Guideline for Pancreatic Cancer (Committee of the Korean Surgical Practice Guideline for Pancreatic Cancer)
  • Received : 2022.02.03
  • Accepted : 2022.02.17
  • Published : 2022.02.28

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is the eighth most common cancer and the fifth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in Korea. Despite the increasing incidence and high mortality rate of pancreatic cancer, there are no appropriate surgical practice guidelines for the current domestic medical situation. To enable standardization of management and facilitate improvements in surgical outcome, a total of 10 pancreatic surgical experts who are members of Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery have developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date, evidence-based research findings and expert opinions. This is an English version of the Korean Surgical Practice Guideline for Pancreatic Cancer 2022. This guideline includes 13 surgical questions and 15 statements. Due to the lack of high-level evidence, strong recommendation is almost impossible. However, we believe that this guideline will help surgeons understand the current status of evidence and suggest what to investigate further to establish more solid recommendations in the future.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This guideline is supported by the Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

References

  1. Hong S, Won YJ, Park YR, Jung KW, Kong HJ, Lee ES. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2017. Cancer Res Treat 2020;52:335-350.  https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2020.206
  2. Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramella C, Hollebecque A, Burtin P, Goere D, et al. Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2015;26 Suppl 5:v56-v68. Erratum in: Ann Oncol 2017;28 Suppl 4:iv167-iv168. 
  3. Okusaka T, Nakamura M, Yoshida M, Kitano M, Uesaka K, Ito Y, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for pancreatic cancer 2019 from the Japan Pancreas Society: a synopsis. Pancreas 2020;49:326-335.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000001513
  4. Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, Behrman SW, Benson AB, Cardin DB, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021;19:439-457.  https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2021.0017
  5. Committee of the Korean clinical practice guideline for pancreatic cancer and National Cancer Center, Korea. Korean clinical practice guideline for pancreatic cancer 2021: a summary of evidence-based, multi-disciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Pancreatology 2021;21:1326-1341.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2021.05.004
  6. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928. 
  7. Kim SY, Park JE, Lee YJ, Seo HJ, Sheen SS, Hahn S, et al. Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:408-414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.016
  8. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1013-1020.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
  9. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:529-536.  https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
  10. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement. CMAJ 2010;182:1045-1052.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.091714
  11. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. CMAJ 2010;182:E472-E478.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.091716
  12. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924-926.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
  13. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schunemann HJ. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 2008;336:995-998.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE
  14. Sell NM, Fong ZV, Del Castillo CF, Qadan M, Warshaw AL, Chang D, et al. Staging laparoscopy not only saves patients an incision, but may also help them live longer. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25:1009-1016.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6317-1
  15. Schnelldorfer T, Gagnon AI, Birkett RT, Reynolds G, Murphy KM, Jenkins RL. Staging laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer: a potential role for advanced laparoscopic techniques. J Am Coll Surg 2014;218:1201-1206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.018
  16. Ahmed SI, Bochkarev V, Oleynikov D, Sasson AR. Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma benefit from staging laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006;16:458-463.  https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2006.16.458
  17. Contreras CM, Stanelle EJ, Mansour J, Hinshaw JL, Rikkers LF, Rettammel R, et al. Staging laparoscopy enhances the detection of occult metastases in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2009;100:663-669.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21402
  18. Paracha M, Van Orden K, Patts G, Tseng J, McAneny D, Sachs T. Opportunity lost? Diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with pancreatic cancer in the national surgical quality improvement program database. World J Surg 2019;43:937-943.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4855-8
  19. Yamamura K, Yamashita YI, Yamao T, Kuroda D, Eto T, Kitano Y, et al. Efficacy of staging laparoscopy for pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res 2020;40:1023-1027.  https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14037
  20. Ta R, O'Connor DB, Sulistijo A, Chung B, Conlon KC. The role of staging laparoscopy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg 2019;36:251-260.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000488372
  21. De Rosa A, Cameron IC, Gomez D. Indications for staging laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2016;18:13-20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2015.10.004
  22. Pisters PW, Lee JE, Vauthey JN, Charnsangavej C, Evans DB. Laparoscopy in the staging of pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2001;88:325-337.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01695.x
  23. Choi M, Hwang HK, Rho SY, Lee WJ, Kang CM. Comparing laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic head cancer: oncologic outcomes and inflammatory scores. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2020;27:124-131.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.697
  24. Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, et al. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 2014;260:633-638; discussion 638-640.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000937
  25. Girgis MD, Zenati MS, King JC, Hamad A, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ, et al. Oncologic outcomes after robotic pancreatic resections are not inferior to open surgery. Ann Surg 2021;274:e262-e268.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003615
  26. Kuesters S, Chikhladze S, Makowiec F, Sick O, Fichtner-Feigl S, Hopt UT, et al. Oncological outcome of laparoscopically assisted pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2018;55:162-166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.026
  27. Stauffer JA, Coppola A, Villacreses D, Mody K, Johnson E, Li Z, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: long-term results at a single institution. Surg Endosc 2017;31:2233-2241.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5222-1
  28. Zhou W, Jin W, Wang D, Lu C, Xu X, Zhang R, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2019;39:66. 
  29. Adam MA, Choudhury K, Dinan MA, Reed SD, Scheri RP, Blazer DG 3rd, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: practice patterns and short-term outcomes among 7061 patients. Ann Surg 2015;262:372-377.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001055
  30. Jiang YL, Zhang RC, Zhou YC. Comparison of overall survival and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2019;19:781. 
  31. Peng L, Zhou Z, Cao Z, Wu W, Xiao W, Cao J. Long-term oncological outcomes in laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019;29:759-769.  https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0683
  32. Yin Z, Jian Z, Hou B, Jin H. Surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 2019;48:861-867.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000001363
  33. Chen K, Zhou Y, Jin W, Zhu Q, Lu C, Niu N, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic outcomes and long-term survival. Surg Endosc 2020;34:1948-1958.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06968-8
  34. Lee SH, Kang CM, Hwang HK, Choi SH, Lee WJ, Chi HS. Minimally invasive RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer within Yonsei criteria: long-term (>median 3 years) oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 2014;28:2848-2855.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3537-3
  35. Sulpice L, Farges O, Goutte N, Bendersky N, Dokmak S, Sauvanet A, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: time for a randomized controlled trial? Results of an all-inclusive national observational study. Ann Surg 2015;262:868-873; discussion 873-874.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001479
  36. van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Klompmaker S, Rawashdeh M, Aleotti F, Al-Sarireh B, et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a pan-European propensity score matched study. Ann Surg 2019;269:10-17.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002561
  37. Zhang M, Fang R, Mou Y, Chen R, Xu X, Zhang R, et al. LDP vs ODP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a case matched study from a single-institution. BMC Gastroenterol 2015;15:182. 
  38. Anderson KL Jr, Adam MA, Thomas S, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Impact of minimally invasive vs. open distal pancreatectomy on use of adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 2017;213:601-605.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.01.005
  39. Kantor O, Bryan DS, Talamonti MS, Lutfi W, Sharpe S, Winchester DJ, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for cancer provides oncologic outcomes and overall survival identical to open distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2017;21:1620-1625.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3506-y
  40. Riviere D, Gurusamy KS, Kooby DA, Vollmer CM, Besselink MG, Davidson BR, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;4:CD011391. 
  41. Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG, DiMagno EP, Burgart LJ, Dahl TR, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery 2005;138:618-628; discussion 628-630.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.044
  42. Nimura Y, Nagino M, Takao S, Takada T, Miyazaki K, Kawarada Y, et al. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: long-term results of a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2012;19:230-241.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0466-6
  43. Jang JY, Kang MJ, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW, Park SJ, et al. A prospective randomized controlled study comparing outcomes of standard resection and extended resection, including dissection of the nerve plexus and various lymph nodes, in patients with pancreatic head cancer. Ann Surg 2014;259:656-664.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000384
  44. Jang JY, Kang JS, Han Y, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW, et al. Long-term outcomes and recurrence patterns of standard versus extended pancreatectomy for pancreatic head cancer: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2017;24:426-433.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.465
  45. Ignjatovic I, Knezevic S, Knezevic D, Dugalic V, Micev M, Matic S, et al. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical surgical treatment for pancreatic head carcinoma. J BUON 2017;22:232-238. 
  46. Svoronos C, Tsoulfas G, Katsourakis A, Noussios G, Chatzitheoklitos E, Marakis NG. Role of extended lymphadenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 2014;84:706-711.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.12423
  47. Wang W, He Y, Wu L, Ye L, Yao L, Tang Z. Efficacy of extended versus standard lymphadenectomy in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. An update meta-analysis. Pancreatology 2019;19:1074-1080.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2019.10.003
  48. Michalski CW, Kleeff J, Wente MN, Diener MK, Buchler MW, Friess H. Systematic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2007;94:265-273.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5716
  49. Giovinazzo F, Turri G, Katz MH, Heaton N, Ahmed I. Meta-analysis of benefits of portal-superior mesenteric vein resection in pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2016;103:179-191.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9969
  50. Peng C, Zhou D, Meng L, Cao Y, Zhang H, Pan Z, et al. The value of combined vein resection in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma: a meta-analysis. BMC Surg 2019;19:84. 
  51. Bell R, Ao BT, Ironside N, Bartlett A, Windsor JA, Pandanaboyana S. Meta-analysis and cost effective analysis of portal-superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatoduodenectomy: impact on margin status and survival. Surg Oncol 2017;26:53-62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2016.12.007
  52. Yu XZ, Li J, Fu DL, Di Y, Yang F, Hao SJ, et al. Benefit from synchronous portal-superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014;40:371-378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2014.01.010
  53. Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Li B, Xu D. Pancreatectomy combined with superior mesenteric vein-portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 2012;36:884-891.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1461-z
  54. Amano H, Miura F, Toyota N, Wada K, Katoh K, Hayano K, et al. Is pancreatectomy with arterial reconstruction a safe and useful procedure for locally advanced pancreatic cancer? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009;16:850-857.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0190-7
  55. Bockhorn M, Burdelski C, Bogoevski D, Sgourakis G, Yekebas EF, Izbicki JR. Arterial en bloc resection for pancreatic carcinoma. Br J Surg 2011;98:86-92.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7270
  56. Bachellier P, Rosso E, Lucescu I, Oussoultzoglou E, Tracey J, Pessaux P, et al. Is the need for an arterial resection a contraindication to pancreatic resection for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma? A case-matched controlled study. J Surg Oncol 2011;103:75-84.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21769
  57. Mollberg N, Rahbari NN, Koch M, Hartwig W, Hoeger Y, Buchler MW, et al. Arterial resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2011;254:882-893.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823ac299
  58. Malczak P, Sierzega M, Stefura T, Kacprzyk A, Dros J, Skomarovska O, et al. Arterial resections in pancreatic cancer - systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2020;22:961-968.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2020.04.005
  59. Haines M, Chua TC, Jamieson NB, Mittal A, Gill AJ, Samra JS. Pancreatoduodenectomy with arterial resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer of the head: a systematic review. Pancreas 2020;49:621-628.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000001551
  60. Wu X, Tao R, Lei R, Han B, Cheng D, Shen B, et al. Distal pancreatectomy combined with celiac axis resection in treatment of carcinoma of the body/tail of the pancreas: a single-center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:1359-1366.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0840-7
  61. Beane JD, House MG, Pitt SC, Kilbane EM, Hall BL, Parmar AD, et al. Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection: what are the added risks? HPB (Oxford) 2015;17:777-784.  https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12453
  62. Yamamoto Y, Sakamoto Y, Ban D, Shimada K, Esaki M, Nara S, et al. Is celiac axis resection justified for T4 pancreatic body cancer? Surgery 2012;151:61-69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2011.06.030
  63. Peters NA, Javed AA, Cameron JL, Makary MA, Hirose K, Pawlik TM, et al. Modified Appleby procedure for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: does improved neoadjuvant therapy warrant such an aggressive approach? Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:3757-3764.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5303-3
  64. Gong H, Ma R, Gong J, Cai C, Song Z, Xu B. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e3061. 
  65. Nigri G, Petrucciani N, Belloni E, Lucarini A, Aurello P, D'Angelo F, et al. Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:1967. 
  66. Storkholm JH, Burgdorf SK, Hansen CP. Distal pancreas-coeliac axis resection with preoperative selective embolization of the coeliac axis: a single high-volume centre experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020;405:635-645.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01919-7
  67. Kawabata Y, Tanaka T, Nishi T, Monma H, Yano S, Tajima Y. Appraisal of a total meso-pancreatoduodenum excision with pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2012;38:574-579.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2012.04.007
  68. Xu J, Tian X, Chen Y, Ma Y, Liu C, Tian L, et al. Total mesopancreas excision for the treatment of pancreatic head cancer. J Cancer 2017;8:3575-3584.  https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.21341
  69. Sugiyama M, Suzuki Y, Nakazato T, Yokoyama M, Kogure M, Abe N, et al. Intestinal derotation procedure for facilitating pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 2016;159:1325-1332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.11.014
  70. Aimoto T, Mizutani S, Kawano Y, Matsushita A, Yamashita N, Suzuki H, et al. Left posterior approach pancreaticoduodenectomy with total mesopancreas excision and circumferential lymphadenectomy around the superior mesenteric artery for pancreatic head carcinoma. J Nippon Med Sch 2013;80:438-445.  https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.80.438
  71. Srinarmwong C, Luechakiettisak P, Prasitvilai W. Standard whipple's operation versus pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial study. J Med Assoc Thai 2008;91:693-698. 
  72. Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S, Ina S, Miyazawa M, Fujita Y, et al. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Surg Today 2009;39:219-224.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-3847-y
  73. Kawai M, Tani M, Hirono S, Okada K, Miyazawa M, Yamaue H. Pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy offers long-term outcomes similar to those of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective study. World J Surg 2014;38:1476-1483.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2420-z
  74. Iqbal N, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS, Abraham AT, Bhattacharya S, Tekkis PP, et al. A comparison of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of 2822 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008;34:1237-1245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2007.12.004
  75. Yang C, Wu HS, Chen XL, Wang CY, Gou SM, Xiao J, et al. Pylorus-preserving versus pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e90316. 
  76. Huttner FJ, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G, Seiler CM, Antes G, Buchler MW, et al. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;2:CD006053. 
  77. Klaiber U, Probst P, Huttner FJ, Bruckner T, Strobel O, Diener MK, et al. Randomized trial of pylorus-preserving vs. pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy: long-term morbidity and quality of life. J Gastrointest Surg 2020;24:341-352.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-04102-y
  78. Fatima J, Schnelldorfer T, Barton J, Wood CM, Wiste HJ, Smyrk TC, et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: implications of positive margin on survival. Arch Surg 2010;145:167-172.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2009.282
  79. Pang TC, Wilson O, Argueta MA, Hugh TJ, Chou A, Samra JS, et al. Frozen section of the pancreatic neck margin in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is of limited utility. Pathology 2014;46:188-192.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PAT.0000000000000072
  80. Mathur A, Ross SB, Luberice K, Kurian T, Vice M, Toomey P, et al. Margin status impacts survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy but negative margins should not be pursued. Am Surg 2014;80:353-360.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481408000416
  81. Nitschke P, Volk A, Welsch T, Hackl J, Reissfelder C, Rahbari M, et al. Impact of intraoperative re-resection to achieve R0 status on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: a single-center experience with 483 patients. Ann Surg 2017;265:1219-1225.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001808
  82. Dikmen K, Kerem M, Bostanci H, Sare M, Ekinci O. Intra-operative frozen section histology of the pancreatic resection margins and clinical outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Med Sci Monit 2018;24:4905-4913.  https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.910279
  83. Crippa S, Guarneri G, Belfiori G, Partelli S, Pagnanelli M, Gasparini G, et al. Positive neck margin at frozen section analysis is a significant predictor of tumour recurrence and poor survival after pancreatodudenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020;46:1524-1531.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.013
  84. Barreto SG, Pandanaboyana S, Ironside N, Windsor JA. Does revision of resection margins based on frozen section improve overall survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2017;19:573-579.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.03.006
  85. Petrucciani N, Nigri G, Debs T, Giannini G, Sborlini E, Antolino L, et al. Frozen section analysis of the pancreatic margin during pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: Does extending the resection to obtain a secondary R0 provide a survival benefit? Results of a systematic review. Pancreatology 2016;16:1037-1043.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2016.09.004
  86. Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery 2003;133:521-527.  https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2003.146
  87. Zhou Q, Fengwei-Gao, Gong J, Xie Q, Liu Y, Wang Q, et al. Assessement of postoperative long-term survival quality and complications associated with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Surg 2019;19:12. 
  88. Sham JG, Guo S, Ding D, Shao Z, Wright M, Jing W, et al. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy versus standard distal pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer, a dual-institutional analysis. Chin Clin Oncol 2020;9:54. Erratum in: Chin Clin Oncol 2020;9:72. 
  89. Abe T, Ohuchida K, Miyasaka Y, Ohtsuka T, Oda Y, Nakamura M. Comparison of surgical outcomes between radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for left-sided pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 2016;40:2267-2275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3526-x
  90. Grossman JG, Fields RC, Hawkins WG, Strasberg SM. Single institution results of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas in 78 patients. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2016;23:432-441.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.362
  91. Kim EY, You YK, Kim DG, Hong TH. Initial experience with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy in a single institution. Ann Surg Treat Res 2016;91:29-36.  https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.91.1.29
  92. Kawabata Y, Hayashi H, Kaji S, Fujii Y, Nishi T, Tajima Y. Laparoscopic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with artery-first approach in pancreatic cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020;405:647-656.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01887-y
  93. Kim HS, Hong TH, You YK, Park JS, Yoon DS. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: findings of a multicenter, retrospective, propensity score matching study. Surg Today 2021;51:1775-1786.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02280-y
  94. Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Hardacre JM, Sohn TA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, et al. Is prophylactic gastrojejunostomy indicated for unresectable periampullary cancer? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 1999;230:322-328; discussion 328-330.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199909000-00005
  95. Wong YT, Brams DM, Munson L, Sanders L, Heiss F, Chase M, et al. Gastric outlet obstruction secondary to pancreatic cancer: surgical vs endoscopic palliation. Surg Endosc 2002;16:310-312.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9061-2
  96. Gurusamy KS, Kumar S, Davidson BR. Prophylactic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable periampullary carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;2013:CD008533. 
  97. Upchurch E, Ragusa M, Cirocchi R. Stent placement versus surgical palliation for adults with malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;5:CD012506. 
  98. Williamsson C, Wennerblom J, Tingstedt B, Jonsson C. A wait-and-see strategy with subsequent self-expanding metal stent on demand is superior to prophylactic bypass surgery for unresectable periampullary cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2016;18:107-112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2015.08.009
  99. Doi R, Kami K, Ito D, Fujimoto K, Kawaguchi Y, Wada M, et al. Prognostic implication of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in resectable pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 2007;31:147-154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0730-5
  100. Schwarz L, Lupinacci RM, Svrcek M, Lesurtel M, Bubenheim M, Vuarnesson H, et al. Para-aortic lymph node sampling in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2014;101:530-538.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9444
  101. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Yuasa Y, Sueda T. Prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Surg 2010;34:1900-1907.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0577-2
  102. Sho M, Murakami Y, Motoi F, Satoi S, Matsumoto I, Kawai M, et al. Postoperative prognosis of pancreatic cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a multicenter study on 822 patients. J Gastroenterol 2015;50:694-702.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-014-1005-4
  103. Hempel S, Plodeck V, Mierke F, Distler M, Aust DE, Saeger HD, et al. Para-aortic lymph node metastases in pancreatic cancer should not be considered a watershed for curative resection. Sci Rep 2017;7:7688. 
  104. Agalianos C, Gouvas N, Papaparaskeva K, Dervenis C. Positive para-aortic lymph nodes following pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Systematic review and meta-analysis of impact on short term survival and association with clinicopathologic features. HPB (Oxford) 2016;18:633-641.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.04.007
  105. Paiella S, Sandini M, Gianotti L, Butturini G, Salvia R, Bassi C. The prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016;42:616-624.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.003
  106. Asaoka T, Miyamoto A, Maeda S, Hama N, Tsujie M, Ikeda M, et al. CA19-9 level determines therapeutic modality in pancreatic cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2018;17:75-80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.01.004
  107. Hackert T, Niesen W, Hinz U, Tjaden C, Strobel O, Ulrich A, et al. Radical surgery of oligometastatic pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017;43:358-363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.023
  108. Zanini N, Lombardi R, Masetti M, Giordano M, Landolfo G, Jovine E. Surgery for isolated liver metastases from pancreatic cancer. Updates Surg 2015;67:19-25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-015-0283-6
  109. Dunschede F, Will L, von Langsdorf C, Mohler M, Galle PR, Otto G, et al. Treatment of metachronous and simultaneous liver metastases of pancreatic cancer. Eur Surg Res 2010;44:209-213.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000313532
  110. Yu X, Gu J, Fu D, Jin C. Dose surgical resection of hepatic metastases bring benefits to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2017;48:149-154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.10.066
  111. Marthey L, Sa-Cunha A, Blanc JF, Gauthier M, Cueff A, Francois E, et al. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results of an AGEO multicenter prospective observational cohort. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:295-301.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3898-9
  112. Habermehl D, Kessel K, Welzel T, Hof H, Abdollahi A, Bergmann F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with Gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Radiat Oncol 2012;7:28. 
  113. Polistina F, Di Natale G, Bonciarelli G, Ambrosino G, Frego M. Neoadjuvant strategies for pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:9374-9383. 
  114. Nanda RH, El-Rayes B, Maithel SK, Landry J. Neoadjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer improves resectability. J Surg Oncol 2015;111:1028-1034.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23921
  115. Gemenetzis G, Groot VP, Blair AB, Laheru DA, Zheng L, Narang AK, et al. Survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection. Ann Surg 2019;270:340-347.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002753
  116. Murphy JE, Wo JY, Ryan DP, Clark JW, Jiang W, Yeap BY, et al. Total neoadjuvant therapy With FOLFIRINOX in combination with losartan followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:1020-1027.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0892
  117. Doi R, Imamura M, Hosotani R, Imaizumi T, Hatori T, Takasaki K, et al. Surgery versus radiochemotherapy for resectable locally invasive pancreatic cancer: final results of a randomized multi-institutional trial. Surg Today 2008;38:1021-1028.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3745-8
  118. Gurusamy KS, Kumar S, Davidson BR, Fusai G. Resection versus other treatments for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(2):CD010244. 
  119. Hirono S, Kawai M, Okada KI, Miyazawa M, Shimizu A, Kitahata Y, et al. Mesenteric approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2017;1:208-218.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12013
  120. Wang M, Zhang H, Zhu F, Peng F, Wang X, Shen M, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer with a modified artery-first approach technique. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2017;16:215-221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-3872(16)60171-6
  121. Kurosaki I, Minagawa M, Takano K, Takizawa K, Hatakeyama K. Left posterior approach to the superior mesenteric vascular pedicle in pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the pancreatic head. JOP 2011;12:220-229. 
  122. Pedziwiatr M, Pisarska M, Malczak P, Major P, Wierdak M, Radkowiak D, et al. Laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy-feasibility study of a modified 'artery first' approach to pancreatic head cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2017;402:917-923.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1597-2
  123. Sabater L, Cugat E, Serrablo A, Suarez-Artacho G, Diez-Valladares L, Santoyo-Santoyo J, et al. Does the artery-first approach improve the rate of R0 resection in pancreatoduodenectomy?: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2019;270:738-746. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003535