Journal of Industrial Convergence (산업융합연구)

DAEHAN Society of Industrial Management (대한산업경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Residential Environmental Satisfaction on Aging in Place : Analysis of Moderated Effects of Housing Characteristics

주거환경 만족도가 지역사회 계속 거주 욕구에 미치는 영향 : 주거특성의 조절효과 분석

  • Baek, Seong-Wook (Management Consulting, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Chan-Ho (Dept. of Business Administration, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2022.03.25
  • Accepted : 2022.08.20
  • Published : 2022.08.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examines the impact of residential environmental satisfaction on AIP(Aging in Place), and analyzes how their relationship differs depending on housing characteristic variables (ownership type, housing type, and residential area). For this purpose, as of November to December 2020, a questionnaire analysis was conducted on 373 adult males and females residing in Busan and Gyeongnam. The results of this study are summarized in two ways as follows. First, the higher the satisfaction with the residential environment, the higher the AIP. Second, it was analyzed that the positive relationship between satisfaction with the residential environment and AIP was higher in ownership than in rental cases, and further decreased in detached houses compared to apartment houses. In addition, compared to other regions, metropolitan cities or small and medium-sized cities had a higher positive (+) relationship between satisfaction with the residential environment and AIP. This study will provide important implications for policymaking related to population and urban planning.

본 연구는 주거환경 만족도가 지역사회 계속 거주 욕구(AIP: Aging In Place)에 미치는 영향을 살펴보고, 이들의 관계가 주거특성 변수(소유형태, 주택유형, 거주지역)에 따라 어떻게 상이한지를 분석한다. 이를 위해 2020년 11월부터 12월까지 부산과 경남지역에 거주하는 성인 남녀로 373명을 대상으로 설문분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음 두 가지로 요약된다. 첫째, 주거환경 만족도가 높을수록 AIP가 증가한다는 실증적 증거를 발견하였다. 둘째, 주거환경 만족도와 AIP 사이의 긍정적인 관련성은 자기소유가 차가인 경우 보다 높고, 공동주택에 비해 단독주택인 경우 더욱 감소하는 것으로 분석되었다. 그리고 기타지역에 비해 광역시나 중소도시인 경우 주거환경 만족도와 AIP에 대한 양(+)의 관련성이 높다는 실증적 결과를 발견하였다. 본 연구는 인구 및 도시계획 관련 정책 입안에 중요한 시사점을 제공할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Weidemann, J. R. Anderson, D. I. Butterfield & P. M. O'Donnell. (1982). Residents' Perceptions of Satisfaction and Safety: A Basis for Change in Multifamily Housing. Environment and Behavior, 14(6), 695-724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916582146004
  2. C. B. Meeks. (1980). Housing, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  3. K. H. Paik. (1990). Motives for Moving and Residential Satisfaction after Moving. Master dissertation. Yonsei University, Seoul.
  4. H. S. Kim. (2019). The Effect of the Elderly,s Satisfaction with Residential Environment on the Needs of Aging in Place in the Community. Master dissertation. Kyonggi University, Seoul.
  5. S. W. Kim & Y. G. Ku. (2014). A Study on the Effect of Dwelling of the Elderly on Satisfaction of Life. Korea real estate academy review, 56, 50-64.
  6. M. P. Cutchin. (2003). The Process of Mediated Aging-in-Place: A Theoretically and Empirically Based Model. Journal of Social Sciences and Medicine, 57, 1077-1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00486-0
  7. S. B. Park. (2011). Residential Factors and Life Satisfaction of the Elderly. Korean Association of Governmental Studies, 23(3), 731-760.
  8. Y. W. Kim, J. W. Jeong & K. M. Song. (2021). A Study on the Important Factors of Physical Aging Friendly City Environment for AIP(Aging in Place) in Rural Areas 50+ Generations. The Journal of Korean Long Term Care, 9(2), 103-121. DOI : 10.32928/TJLTC.9.2.5
  9. J. E. Kim & Y. J. Jung. (2020). The Effects of Self Care and Social Care on Aging in Place Among Elderly Persons with Disabilities. The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 21, 11(6), 1441-1452. DOI : 10.22143/HSS21.11.6.102
  10. Y. J. Kim. (2006). A Study on Residential Remodeling and Needs of Elderly Households to Activate Aging in Place. Journal of Human Ecology, 23, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2008.11906049
  11. Y. J. Seo. (2018). A Study of the Senior Serviced Housing for Aging in Place in the context of Urban Regeneration. Doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University, Seoul.
  12. E. W. Morris & M. Winter. (1978). Housing, Family, and Society, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  13. O. J. Kwon, Y. M. Lee, H. H. Ha & J. Y. Kim. (2014). Reasons for Seniors' Aging in Place within Their Community. Family and Environment Research, 52(3), 285-299. https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2014.025
  14. J. Wolpert. (1965). Behavioral Aspects of the Decision to Migrate. Papers and Proceedings, 15, 159-172.
  15. S. Kasl & E. Harhurg. (1972). Perceptions of Neighborhood and Desire to Move out. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 38, 318-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367208977628
  16. J. Speare. (1970). Home ownership, Life cycle stage, and Residential Mobility, Demography 7.
  17. W. Michelson. (1966). An Empirical Analysis of Urban Environmental Preference. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 38, 355-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366608978510
  18. P. H. Rossi. (1955). Why Families Move : A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility, The Free Press, New York.
  19. E. W. Morris & M. Winter. (1976). Housing Norms, Housing Satisfaction and Propensity to move. Journal of Marriage and The Family, 38, 309-320. https://doi.org/10.2307/350390