DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparing Physiological Changes in Breathing Conditions during Cognitive Tasks

인지부하 환경에서 호흡방식이 생체신호의 변화에 미치는 영향

  • 정주연 (가천대학교 일반대학원 보건과학과) ;
  • 이영배 (가천대학교 의과대학 신경과, 가천대학길의료센터 신경과) ;
  • 박현미 (가천대학교 의과대학 신경과, 가천대학길의료센터 신경과) ;
  • 강창기 (가천대학교 보건과학대학 방사선학과)
  • Received : 2022.03.14
  • Accepted : 2022.04.20
  • Published : 2022.06.30

Abstract

With external air pollution forcing many people indoors, new methods of facilitating healthier indoor life are necessary. This study, therefore, investigates the effects of indoor oxygen concentration and respiration methods on biosignals and cognitive ability. The study included twenty healthy subjects who inhaled air through a mask from a gas delivery system. All subjects were asked to perform three types of breathing (nasal, oral, and oral breathing with high oxygenation) and respond to cognitive stimuli (rest close eye, rest open eye, 1-back and 2-back working memory tasks). The changes in cognitive load according to respiration were analyzed by measuring response time, accuracy, and biosignals to stimuli. The result showed that, in all three respirations, heart rate significantly increased with the increase in cognitive load. Also, in oral respiration, the airway respiration rate significantly increased according to the increase in cognitive load. The change appeared to compensate for insufficient oxygen supply in oral respiration during cognitive activity. Conversely, there was no significant change in airway respiration rate during oral respiration with a high concentration oxygen supply as in nasal respiration. This result suggests that a high concentration oxygen supply might play a role in compensating for insufficient oxygen concentration or inefficient oxygen inhalation, such as oral respiration. Based on the results of this study, a follow-up study is necessary to determine the impact of changes in the autonomic nervous system, such as stress and emotions, to find out more precise and comprehensive effects of oxygen concentration and breathing type.

대기오염 등의 영향으로 실내 활동 시간이 증가하는 상황에서 뇌기능과 신체활동 측면에서 보다 건강한 실내 생활을 위한 다양한 방안에 대한 고려가 절실한 실정이다. 본 연구는 실내 산소의 농도와 호흡의 방법에 따라 인지능력과 생체신호에 어떤 영향을 미치는지에 대해 연구하여 보다 건강한 실내 일상생활을 제안하고자 한다. 건강한 성인 20명을 대상으로 공기 전달 시스템을 통해 공급된 공기를 산소마스크를 통해 흡입하도록 하였다. 호흡 방법과 산소농도에 따른 변화를 확인하기 위해 모든 피험자는 3가지 호흡(비강, 구강, 및 고농도 산소공급과 함께 구강 호흡)을 인지부하자극(눈 감은 휴식기, 눈 뜬 휴식기, 1-back 및 2-back 작업기억 과제) 별로 각각 수행하였다. 자극에 대한 반응시간, 정확도 및 생체신호를 측정하여 호흡에 따른 인지부하별 변화를 분석하였다. 그 결과, 3가지 호흡에서 모두 인지부하의 증가에 따라 심박동수는 유의하게 증가하면서 인지부하와 높은 상관성이 있는 생체신호임을 확인하였다. 또한 구강호흡에서는 분당 호흡 횟수가 인지부하증가에 따라 유의하게 증가하는 변화가 나타났으며, 인지활동 시 구강호흡에서 부족한 산소공급을 보완하기 위한 생체신호의 변화를 확인하게 되었다. 반면 고농도 산소공급과 함께 수행한 구강호흡에서는 비강호흡과 같이 분당 호흡 횟수의 유의한 변화는 없는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 고농도 산소공급이 구강호흡과 같이 비효율적인 산소 흡입이나 산소 농도가 부족한 환경에서 이를 보완해 주는 역할을 할 가능성이 있음을 시사한다. 본 연구 결과를 기반으로 후속 연구에서는 자율신경계 변화까지 분석하여 인지 뿐만 아니라 심리에 미치는 영향까지 종합적으로 규명하고자 한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through the Digital Infrastructure Building Project for Monitoring, Surveying and Evaluating the Environmental Health, funded by Korean Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2021003340002).

References

  1. Backs, R. W., & Seljos, K. A. (1994). Metabolic and cardiorespiratory measures of mental effort: The effects of level of difficulty in a working memory task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 16(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8760(94)90042-6
  2. Doherty, R. M., Heal, M. R., & O'Connor, F. M. (2017). Climate change impacts on human health over Europe through its effect on air quality. Environmental Health, 16(1), 118. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-017-0325-2
  3. Flanell, M. (2019). The Athlete's Secret Ingredient: The Power of Nasal Breathing. 5.
  4. Grassmann, M., Vlemincx, E., von Leupoldt, A., Mittelstadt, J. M., & Van den Bergh, O. (2016). Respiratory changes in response to cognitive load: A systematic review. Neural Plasticity, 2016, 8146809. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8146809
  5. Jung, J.-Y., & Kang, C.-K. (2021). Investigation on the effect of oral breathing on cognitive activity using functional brain imaging. Healthcare, 9(6), 645. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9060645
  6. Jung, J.-Y., Park, C.-A., Lee, Y.-B., & Kang, C.-K. (2020). Investigation of functional connectivity differences between voluntary respirations via mouth and nose using resting state fMRI. Brain Sciences, 10(10), 704. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10100704
  7. Lee, K.-J., Lee, S.-Y., Park, S.-Y., Jang, S.-R., & Kang, C.-K. (2016). EEG study for the effects of mouth breathing on brain functions. Science of Emotion and Sensibility, 19(4), 119-126. DOI: 10.14695/KJSOS.2016.19.4.119
  8. Lee, K.-J., Park, C.-A., Lee, Y.-B., Kim, H.-K., & Kang, C.-K. (2020). EEG signals during mouth breathing in a working memory task. International Journal of Neuroscience, 130(5), 425-434. DOI: 10.1080/00207454.2019.1667787
  9. Lundberg, J. O. (2008). Nitric oxide and the paranasal sinuses. The Anatomical Record, 291(11), 1479-1484. DOI: 10.1002/ar.20782
  10. Martin, U., Bryden, K., Devoy, M., & Howarth, P. (1996). Increased levels of exhaled nitric oxide during nasal and oral breathing in subjects with seasonal rhinitis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 97(3), 768-772. DOI: 10.1016/S0091-6749(96)80154-0
  11. Min, J.-W. (2019). Public perception survey on fine dust - The economic cost of fine dust is estimated at KRW 4 trillion per year. Korea Economic Review, 833, 1-16.
  12. Pevernagie, D. A., De Meyer, M. M., & Claeys, S. (2005). Sleep, breathing and the nose. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 9(6), 437-451. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2005.02.002
  13. Scholey, A. B., Harper, S., & Kennedy, D. O. (2001). Cognitive demand and blood glucose. Physiology & Behavior, 73(4), 585-592. DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00476-0
  14. Solhjoo, S., Haigney, M. C., McBee, E., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., Schuwirth, L., Artino, A. R., Battista, A., Ratcliffe, T. A., Lee, H. D., & Durning, S. J. (2019). Heart rate and heart rate variability correlate with clinical reasoning performance and self-reported measures of cognitive load. Scientific Reports, 9, 14668. DOI: 10.1038/s41598- 019-50280-3
  15. Eom, Y.-S., Kim, J.-O., & Ahn, S.-E..(2019). Measuring willingness to pay for PM10 risk reduction: Evidence from averting expenditures for anti-PM10 masks and air purifiers. Environmental and Resource Economics Review, 28(3), 355-383. https://doi.org/10.15266/KEREA.2019.28.3.355
  16. Xia, Y., Shikii, S.-I., & Shimomura, Y. (2020). Determining how different levels of indoor carbon dioxide affect human monotonous task performance and their effects on human activation states using a lab experiment: A tracking task. Ergonomics, 63(11), 1350-1358. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1784466