아시아태평양코퍼스연구 (Asia Pacific Journal of Corpus Research)

국립인천대학교 코퍼스연구소 (Institute for Corpus Research)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Corpus-Based Longitudinal Study of Diction in Chinese and British News Reports on Chang'e Project

  • 투고 : 2022.05.30
  • 심사 : 2022.08.16
  • 발행 : 2022.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

As a milestone progression in China's space exploration history, Chang'e Project has attracted a lot of media attention since its first launching. This study aims to examine and compare the similarities and differences between the Chinese media and the British media in using nouns, verbs, and adjectives to report the Chang'e Project. After categorising the documents based on specific project phases, we created two diachronic corpora to explore the linguistic shifts and similarities and differences of diction employed by the Chinese and British media on the Chang'e Project ideology. This longitudinal study was performed with Lancsbox and the CLAWS web tagger through critical discourse analysis as the theoretical framework. The findings of the current study showed that the Chang'e Project coverage in both media increased on an annual basis, especially after 2019. In contrast to the objectivity and positivity in the Chinese Media, the British Media seemed to be more subjective with more appraisal adjectives in the news reports. Nonetheless, both countries were trying to be objective and formal in choosing nouns and verbs. Ideology-wise, the Chinese news media reports portrayed more positivity on domestic circumstances while the British counterpart was typically more critical. Notably, the study outcomes could catalyse future research on the Chang'e Project and facilitate diplomatic policies.

키워드

과제정보

This study is part of a research program School-level Scientific Research Project of Tianshui Normal University. Research No. CXJ2021-13.

참고문헌

  1. Akpan, C. S., Ifeanyi, A. L., Martin, O. P., Alexander, O. C., & Uchenna, A. (2012). Rethinking objectivity in news reporting in the digital age. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 4(4), 711-729.
  2. Canella, G. (2021). Journalistic power: Constructing the "Truth" and the economics of objectivity. Journalism Practice, DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2021.1914708.
  3. Deng, F. (2020). Computerized corpus keyword approaches to evaluation: A case study of evaluative attitudes of "the Belt and Road" reports in mainstream media of China and America, International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, DOI: 10.1177/0020720920923303.
  4. Fairclough, N. (2013). Language and power 2000. In Candlin, C. N. (Ed.), Language and Power (2nd ed.) (pp. 203-218). London: Routledge.
  5. Guanah, J. S., & Obi, I. (2020). Newspaper reportage and objectivity: An examination of newspaper owners' affiliation to political parties. Edo Journal of Arts Management and Social Science, 2(1), 275-293.
  6. Hackett, R. A. (1984). Decline of a paradigm? Bias and objectivity in news media studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1(3), 229-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038409360036
  7. Liu, M., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Discursive constructions of scientific (Un) certainty about the health risks of China's air pollution: A corpus-assisted discourse study. Language & Communication, 60, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.01.006
  8. Mayr, A. (2008). Introduction: Power, discourse and institutions. In Mayr, A. (Ed.), Language and Power: An Introduction to Institutional Discourse (pp. 1-25). London: Continuum.
  9. McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Nesler, M. S., Aguinis, H., Quigley, B. M., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1993). The effect of credibility on perceived power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(17), 1407-1425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01040.x
  11. Omotola, J. S. (2009). Nigerian parties and political ideology. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 1(3), 612-634.
  12. Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Sinclair, J. (2004). Current issues in corpus linguistics. In J. Sinclair & Carter, R. (Eds.), Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse (pp. 185-193). London: Routledge.
  14. Stevenson, A. (Ed.). (2010). Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  15. Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  16. Trask, R. L. (1993). A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. London: Routledge.
  17. van Dijk, T. A. (2013). News Analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. New York: Routledge.
  18. Wang, Q., & Liu, J. (2016). A Chang'e-4 mission concept and vision of future Chinese lunar exploration activities. Acta Astronautica, 127, 678-683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.06.024
  19. Yu, H., Lu, H., & Hu, J. (2021). A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of news reports on the COVID-19 pandemic in China and the UK. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(2), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v11n2p36
  20. Zheng, Y., Ouyang, Z., Li, C., Liu, J., & Zou, Y. (2008). China's lunar exploration program: Present and future. Planetary and Space Science, 56(7), 881-886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2008.01.002