대한두개안면성형외과학회지 (Archives of Craniofacial Surgery)

  • 제23권4호
  • /
  • Pages.187-189
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2287-1152(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-5603(eISSN)
대한두개안면성형외과학회 (Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correction of pixie ear: infraauricular skin redraping method

  • Kim, Jun Hyeok (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Yang, Young Bin (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Oh, Deuk Young (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 투고 : 2022.05.18
  • 심사 : 2022.08.20
  • 발행 : 2022.08.20
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Patients with pixie ear have an attached, tapering, and low-set earlobe. Traditional methods usually describe excision of the caudal portion of the lobule and reattachment in a more superior position. The present report suggests a simplified skin redraping method for correction of pixie ear. The procedure provides easy method to design and perform, which only requires elevation and trimming of the skin. Other ancillary procedures, such as flap design, anchoring, plication, and subdermal fixation, are not required. This method produces satisfactory results. Postoperative scar is invisible because the incision is on the retroauricular region, and the corrected earlobe has a more natural appearance than the repositioned earlobe. Moreover, skin redraping avoids tension, which contributes to minimization of the postoperative scar.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Fuente-Del-Campo A. Commentary on: an update on the posterior earlobe/concha mastoid suspension suture to correct "pixie ear" following facelift: review of 40 cases. Aesthet Surg J 2021;41:NP1366-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa365
  2. Hoefflin SM. Simple repair of a pixie earlobe. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:1623-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200105000-00074
  3. Clevens RA, Baker SR. Plastic and reconstructive surgery of the earlobe. Facial Plast Surg 1995;11:301-9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1064546
  4. Nakamura M, Ikeda T, Shioya N. Side-to-side earlobe variations with respect to surface area and shape: a quantitative study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1995;19:561-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00454323
  5. Rich JD, Gottlieb V, Shesol BF. A simple method for correction of the pixie earlobe. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982;69:136-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198201000-00027
  6. Khoo BC. The pixie earlobe: a method of correction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;76:636-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198510000-00031
  7. Park C. A new method for the correction of small pixie earlobe deformities. Ann Plast Surg 2007;59:273-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31802f6da7
  8. Oh YW, Seul CH, Yoo WM. Medial epicanthoplasty using the skin redraping method. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:703-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000246713.59153.bb
  9. Hwang K. White radish and swine scapular cartilage models for auricular framework carving training. Arch Craniofac Surg 2020;21:225-8. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00297
  10. Lee D, Kim YS, Roh TS, Yun IS. Cryptotia recurrence lowering technique with additional acellular dermal matrix graft. Arch Craniofac Surg 2019;20:170-5. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2019.00269
  11. Kim DG, Cho HG, Ryu JY, Lee JS, Lee SJ, Lee JM, et al. Clinical assessment and management of auricular arteriovenous malformation: retrospective study. Arch Craniofac Surg 2021;22: 141-7. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00192