DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic performance evaluation of RC bearing wall structures

  • Rashedi, Seyed Hadi (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology) ;
  • Rahai, Alireza (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology) ;
  • Tehrani, Payam (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology)
  • Received : 2021.04.03
  • Accepted : 2022.06.15
  • Published : 2022.08.25

Abstract

Reinforced concrete bearing walls (RCBWs) are one of the most applicable structural systems. Therefore, vulnerability analysis and rehabilitation of the RCBW system are of great importance. In the present study, in order to the more precise investigation of the performance of this structural resistant system, pushover and nonlinear time history analyses based on several assumptions drawing upon experimental research were performed on several models with different stories. To validate the nonlinear analysis method, the analytical and experimental results are compared. Vulnerability evaluation was carried out on two seismic hazard levels and three performance levels. Eventually, the need for seismic rehabilitation with the basic safety objective (BSO) was investigated. The obtained results showed that the studied structures satisfied the BSO of the seismic rehabilitation guidelines. Consequently, according to the results of analyses and the desired performance, this structural system, despite its high structural weight and rigid connections and low flexibility, has integrated performance, and it can be a good option for earthquake-resistant constructions.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI 318 (1999), Building Code and Commentary, American Concrete Institute; Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
  2. ACI 318 (2014), Building Code Requirement for Structural Concrete and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
  3. ASCE 41-06 (2007), Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston Virginia, USA.
  4. ASCE 7 (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, USA.
  5. Asgari, M. and Tariverdilo, S. (2017), "Investigating the seismic response of structural walls using nonlinear static and incremental dynamic analyses", Int. J. Eng., 30(11), 1691-1699. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2017.30.11b.09.
  6. ATC-19 (1995), Structural Response Modification Factors, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
  7. Baker, J.W. (2007), "Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97(5), 1486-1501. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060255.
  8. Bas, S., Lee, J.H., Sevinc, M. and Kalkan, I. (2017), "Seismic performance of RC structures under vertical ground motion", Comput. Concrete, 20(4), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.20.4.369.
  9. Borghini, A., Gusella, F. and Vignoli, A. (2016), "Seismic vulnerability of existing RC buildings: A simplified numerical model to analyse the influence of the beam-column joints collapse", Eng. Struct., 121, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.045.
  10. Brunesi, E., Nascimbene, R. and Pavese, A. (2016), "Mechanical model for seismic response assessment of lightly reinforced concrete walls", Earthq. Struct., 11(3), 461-481. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.3.461.
  11. Cornell, C. and Shome, N. (1999), "Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures", Report No. RMS-35, Stanford University, CA.
  12. Cotsovos, D.M. and Pavlovic, M.N. (2005), "Numerical investigation of RC structural walls subjected to cyclic loading", Comput. Concrete, 2(3), 215-238. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2005.2.3.215.
  13. Dashti, F., Dhakal, R.P. and Pampanin, S. (2014), "Comparative in-plane pushover response of a typical RC rectangular wall designed by different standards", Earthq. Struct., 7(5), 667-689. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.5.667.
  14. Dayala, D., Dan, M.B. and Yakut, A. (2004), "Vulnerable dwelling typologies in European countries affected by recent earthquakes", 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, August.
  15. Dilmac, H., Ulutas, H., Tekeli, H. and Demir, F. (2018), "The investigation of seismic performance of existing RC buildings with and without infill walls", Comput. Concrete, 22(5), 439-447. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.22.5.439.
  16. Ebrahimi Motlagh, H.R. and Tehrani, P. (2021), "Seismic fragility analysis of concrete bridges subjected to far-and near-field records", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.20.00284.
  17. FEMA 356 (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Building, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C, USA.
  18. FEMA P695 (2009), Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C, USA.
  19. Fischinger, M., Isakovic, T. and Kante, P. (2004), "Implementation of a macro model to predict seismic response of RC structural walls", Comput. Concrete, 1(2), 211-226. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2004.1.2.211.
  20. Ghodsi, T. and Ruiz, J.A.F. (2010), "Pacific earthquake engineering research/seismic safety commission tall building design case study 2", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 19(1-2), 197-256. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.542.
  21. Gonzales, H. and Lopez-Almansa, F. (2012), "Seismic performance of buildings with thin RC bearing walls", Eng. Struct., 34(6), 244-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.007.
  22. Gorgulu, O. and Taskin, B. (2015), "Numerical simulation of RC infill walls under cyclic loading and calibration with widely used hysteretic models and experiments", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 13(9), 2591-2610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9739-9.
  23. Gunes, N. (2020), "Comparison of monotonic and cyclic pushover analyses for the near-collapse point on a mid-rise reinforced concrete framed building", Earthq. Struct., 19(3), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.19.3.189.
  24. Gunes, N. and Ulucan, Z.C. (2019), "Nonlinear dynamic response of a tall building to near-fault pulse-like ground motions", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 17(6), 2989-3013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00570-y.
  25. Gunes, N. and Ulucan, Z.C. (2021), "Collapse probability of codebased design of a seismically isolated reinforced concrete building", Struct., 33, 2402-2412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.010.
  26. Han, S.W., Oh, Y.H. and Lee, L.H. (2002), "Seismic behavior of structural walls with specific details", Mag. Concrete Res., 54(5), 333-345. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2002.54.5.333.
  27. Heo, Y. and Kunnath, S.K. (2013), "Damage-based seismic performance evaluation of reinforced concrete frames", Int. J. Concrete Struct. Mater., 7(3), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-013-0046-z.
  28. Hsu, T.T. and Belarbi, A. (1994), "Constitutive laws of concrete in tension and reinforcing bars stiffened by concrete", ACI Struct. J., 91(4), 465-474. https://doi.org/10.14359/4154.
  29. Hyun, C.H., Choi, S., Choi, K.R., Shin, H.M. and Park, J.H. (2004), "Seismic response evaluation of an RC bearing wall by displacement-based approach", 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, August.
  30. Kim, J. and Baek, D. (2013), "Seismic risk assessment of staggered wall system structures", Earthq. Struct., 5, 607-624. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.5.607.
  31. Kim, J. and Choi, Y. (2017), "Seismic capacity design and retrofit of reinforced concrete staggered wall structures", Int. J. Concrete Struct. Mater., 11(2), 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-017-0192-9.
  32. Kim, J., Jun, Y. and Kang, H. (2016), "Seismic behavior factors of RC staggered wall buildings", Int. J. Concrete Struct. Mater., 10(3), 355-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-016-0142-y.
  33. Kim, J.H. (2005), "Ductility enhancement of reinforced concrete thin walls", Comput. Concrete, 2(2), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2005.2.2.111.
  34. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1988), "Observed stress-strain behavior of confined concrete", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1827-1849. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1827).
  35. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1988), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
  36. Medina G. (2005), "Full-scale experimental study of the behavior of concrete walls and one assembly reinforced with welded wire mesh", Bach. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, National University of Engineering, Lima, Peru.
  37. Miranda, E. and Bertero, V.V. (1994), "Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design", Earthq. Spectra, 10(2), 357-379. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585778.
  38. Nastri, E., Vergato, M. and Latour, M. (2017), "Performance evaluation of a seismic retrofitted RC precast industrial building", Earthq. Struct., 12(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.013.
  39. Ni, S. and Birely, A.C. (2018), "Post-fire seismic behavior of reinforced concrete structural walls", Eng. Struct., 168(10), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.018.
  40. Orakcal, K. and Wallace, J.W. (2006), "Flexural modeling of reinforced concrete walls-experimental verification", ACI Mater. J., 103(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.14359/15177.
  41. Paulay, T. and Priestley, M.N. (1992), Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA.
  42. PERFORM-3D (2006), User Guide of Structural Software, Computers and Structures, Inc., (CSI), Berkeley, CA.
  43. PERFORM-3D (2011), Nonlinear Analysis and Performance Assessment for 3D Structure, Computer and Structures Inc., (CSI), http://www.csiamerica.com.
  44. Pinho, R. (2007), "Nonlinear dynamic analysis of structures subjected to seismic action", Adv. Earthq. Eng. Anal., 63-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-74214-3_5.
  45. Powell, G.H. (2007), Performance Based Design using Nonlinear Analysis, Computers and Structures, Inc., (CSI), Berkeley, CA.
  46. Rahai, A.R. and Rashedi, S.H. (2017), "Evaluation of ductility of bearing concrete wall systems with regard to their boundary element", Amirkabir J. Civil Eng., 49(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.22060/ceej.2017.10468.4896.
  47. Sabau, C., Popescu, C., Bagge, N., Sas, G., Blanksvard, T. and Taljsten, B. (2019), "Local and global behavior of walls with cut-out openings in multi-story reinforced concrete buildings", Eng. Struct., 187(5), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.046.
  48. Shin, J. and Kim, J. (2014), "Different macroscopic models for slender and squat reinforced concrete walls subjected to cyclic loads", Earthq. Struct., 7(5), 877-890. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.5.877.
  49. Thomsen IV, J.H. and Wallace, J.W. (2004), "Displacement-based design of slender reinforced concrete structural wallsexperimental verification", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 130(4), 618-630. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:4(618).
  50. Zenunovic, D. and Folic, R. (2012), "Models for behavior analysis of monolithic wall and precast or monolithic floor slab connections", Eng. Struct., 40(2), 466-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.007.