Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of dentin surface preparations on bonding of self-etching adhesives under simulated pulpal pressure

  • Chantima Siriporananon (Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University) ;
  • Pisol Senawongse (Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University) ;
  • Vanthana Sattabanasuk (Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University) ;
  • Natchalee Srimaneekarn (Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University) ;
  • Hidehiko Sano (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University) ;
  • Pipop Saikaew (Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University)
  • Received : 2021.05.11
  • Accepted : 2021.07.24
  • Published : 2022.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the effects of different smear layer preparations on the dentin permeability and microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of 2 self-etching adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond [CSE] and Clearfil Tri-S Bond Universal [CTS]) under dynamic pulpal pressure. Materials and Methods: Human third molars were cut into crown segments. The dentin surfaces were prepared using 4 armamentaria: 600-grit SiC paper, coarse diamond burs, superfine diamond burs, and carbide burs. The pulp chamber of each crown segment was connected to a dynamic intra-pulpal pressure simulation apparatus, and the permeability test was done under a pressure of 15 cmH2O. The relative permeability (%P) was evaluated on the smear layer-covered and bonded dentin surfaces. The teeth were bonded to either of the adhesives under pulpal pressure simulation, and cut into sticks after 24 hours water storage for the µTBS test. The resin-dentin interface and nanoleakage observations were performed using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical comparisons were done using analysis of variance and post hoc tests. Results: Only the method of surface preparation had a significant effect on permeability (p < 0.05). The smear layers created by the carbide and superfine diamond burs yielded the lowest permeability. CSE demonstrated a higher µTBS, with these values in the superfine diamond and carbide bur groups being the highest. Microscopic evaluation of the resin-dentin interface revealed nanoleakage in the coarse diamond bur and SiC paper groups for both adhesives. Conclusions: Superfine diamond and carbide burs can be recommended for dentin preparation with the use of 2-step CSE.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Miss Chayada Teanchai for technical assistance in obtaining the SEM images.

References

  1. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023
  2. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007;28:3757-3785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044
  3. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh B, Carvalho R, Miller M. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part I. Bond strength and morphologic evidence. Am J Dent 2004;17:271-278.
  4. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014;42:800-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012
  5. Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosa M, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, Pashley DH, Tay F, Breschi L. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent 2014;42:603-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.008
  6. Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigao J. Universal dental adhesives: current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2019;107:2121-2131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34305
  7. Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015;43:765-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003
  8. Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holz J, Pashley D. Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth, in vivo. J Endod 1995;21:191-194.
  9. Hosaka K, Nakajima M, Yamauti M, Aksornmuang J, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Pashley DH, Tagami J. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on all-in-one adhesive bond strengths to dentine. J Dent 2007;35:207-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.08.001
  10. Mahdan MH, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Combined effect of smear layer characteristics and hydrostatic pulpal pressure on dentine bond strength of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing adhesives. J Dent 2013;41:861-871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.002
  11. Moll K, Haller B. Effect of intrinsic and extrinsic moisture on bond strength to dentine. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:150-165.
  12. Mitchem JC, Gronas DG. Adhesion to dentin with and without smear layer under varying degrees of wetness. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:619-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90441-X
  13. Prati C, Pashley DH, Montanari G. Hydrostatic intrapulpal pressure and bond strength of bonding systems. Dent Mater 1991;7:54-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(91)90028-W
  14. Ermis RB, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Coutinho E, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin prepared with three different diamond burs. Dent Mater 2008;24:978-985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.019
  15. Saikaew P, Chowdhury AF, Fukuyama M, Kakuda S, Carvalho RM, Sano H. The effect of dentine surface preparation and reduced application time of adhesive on bonding strength. J Dent 2016;47:63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.02.001
  16. Semeraro S, Mezzanzanica D, Spreafico D, Gagliani M, Re D, Tanaka T, Sidhu SK, Sano H. Effect of different bur grinding on the bond strength of self-etching adhesives. Oper Dent 2006;31:317-323. https://doi.org/10.2341/04-171
  17. Tani C, Finger WJ. Effect of smear layer thickness on bond strength mediated by three all-in-one selfetching priming adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:283-289.
  18. Sattabanasuk V, Vachiramon V, Qian F, Armstrong SR. Resin-dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods. J Dent 2007;35:467-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.01.002
  19. Saikaew P, Senawongse P, Chowdhury AA, Sano H, Harnirattisai C. Effect of smear layer and surface roughness on resin-dentin bond strength of self-etching adhesives. Dent Mater J 2018;37:973-980. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-349
  20. Pashley DH. Dentin bonding: overview of the substrate with respect to adhesive material. J Esthet Dent 1991;3:46-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00808.x
  21. Oliveira SS, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent Mater 2003;19:758-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00023-X
  22. Tay FR, Carvalho R, Sano H, Pashley DH. Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:99-116.
  23. Reis A, Grandi V, Carlotto L, Bortoli G, Patzlaff R, Rodrigues Accorinte ML, Dourado Loguercio A. Effect of smear layer thickness and acidity of self-etching solutions on early and long-term bond strength to dentin. J Dent 2005;33:549-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.12.003
  24. Armstrong S, Breschi L, Ozcan M, Pfefferkorn F, Ferrari M, Van Meerbeek B. Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using microtensile bond strength (µTBS) approach. Dent Mater 2017;33:133-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015
  25. Carvalho AO, Oliveira MT, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Giannini M. Effect of adhesive system and application strategy on reduction of dentin permeability. Braz Oral Res 2012;26:397-403. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012005000020
  26. Pashley DH, Depew DD. Effects of the smear layer, Copalite, and oxalate on microleakage. Oper Dent 1986;11:95-102.
  27. Sauro S, Pashley DH, Montanari M, Chersoni S, Carvalho RM, Toledano M, Osorio R, Tay FR, Prati C. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin permeability and adhesion of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2007;23:705-713.
  28. Siegel SC, von Fraunhofer JA. Dental cutting with diamond burs: heavy-handed or light-touch? J Prosthodont 1999;8:3-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1999.tb00002.x
  29. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yoshiyama M. Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res 2002;81:472-476.
  30. Pashley DH, Kepler EE, Williams EC, Okabe A. The effects of acid etching on the in-vivo permeability of dentine in the dog. Arch Oral Biol 1983;28:555-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(83)90001-8
  31. Prati C, Venturi L, Valdre G, Mongiorgi R. Dentin morphology and permeability after brushing with different toothpastes in the presence and absence of smear layer. J Periodontol 2002;73:183-190. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.2.183
  32. Saikaew P, Matsumoto M, Sattabanasuk V, Harnirattisai C, Carvalho RM, Sano H. Ultra-morphological characteristics of dentin surfaces after different preparations and treatments. Eur J Oral Sci 2020;128:246-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12698
  33. Czonstkowsky M, Wilson EG, Holstein FA. The smear layer in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1990.34:13-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(22)01160-0
  34. Pashley DH. Smear layer: overview of structure and function. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88(Supplement 1):215-224.
  35. Masic A, Bertinetti L, Schuetz R, Chang SW, Metzger TH, Buehler MJ, Fratzl P. Osmotic pressure induced tensile forces in tendon collagen. Nat Commun 2015;6:5942.
  36. Sherman VR, Yang W, Meyers MA. The materials science of collagen. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015;52:22-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.05.023
  37. Sahin C, Cehreli ZC, Yenigul M, Dayangac B. In vitro permeability of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives used for immediate dentin sealing. Dent Mater J 2012;31:401-408. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-217
  38. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-458.
  39. do Amaral RC, Stanislawczuk R, Zander-Grande C, Michel MD, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Active application improves the bonding performance of self-etch adhesives to dentin. J Dent 2009;37:82-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.010
  40. Perdigao J. Dentin bonding-variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Mater 2010;26:e24-e37.