DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shape and anatomical relationship of the mental foramen to the mandibular premolars in an Indian sub-population: a retrospective CBCT analysis

  • Komal Sheth (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Nair Hospital Dental College) ;
  • Kulvinder Singh Banga (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Nair Hospital Dental College) ;
  • Ajinkya M. Pawar (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Nair Hospital Dental College) ;
  • James L. Gutmann (Department of Endodontics, Nova Southeastern University) ;
  • Hyeon-Cheol Kim (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.04.06
  • 심사 : 2021.06.13
  • 발행 : 2022.02.28

초록

Objectives: This study assessed the shape and anatomical relationship of the mental foramen (MF) to mandibular posterior teeth in an Indian sub-population. Materials and Methods: In total, 475 existing cone-beam computed tomography records exhibiting 950 MFs and including the bilateral presence of mandibular premolars and first molars were assessed. Images were evaluated 3-dimensionally to ascertain the position, shape, and anatomical proximity of MFs to mandibular teeth. The position and shape of MFs were measured and calculated. The Pythagorean theorem was used to calculate the distance between the root apex of the mandibular teeth and the MF. Results: MFs exhibited a predominantly round shape (left: 67% and right: 65%) followed by oval (left: 30% and right: 31%) in both males and females and in different age groups. The root apices of mandibular second premolars (left: 71% and right: 62%) were closest to the MF, followed by distal to the first premolars and mesial to the second premolars. The mean vertical distance between the MF and the nearest tooth apex calculated on sagittal sections was 2.20 mm on the right side and 2.32 mm on the left side; no significant difference was found according to sex or age. The distance between the apices of the teeth and the MF was ≥ 4 mm (left; 4.09 ± 1.27 mm and right; 4.01 ± 1.15 mm). Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for clinicians to be aware of the location of the MF in treatment planning and while performing non-surgical and surgical endodontic procedures.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chong BS, Gohil K, Pawar R, Makdissi J. Anatomical relationship between mental foramen, mandibular teeth and risk of nerve injury with endodontic treatment. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:381-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1801-8
  2. Greenstein G, Tarnow D. The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review. J Periodontol 2006;77:1933-1943. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.060197
  3. Ahonen M, Tjaderhane L. Endodontic-related paresthesia: a case report and literature review. J Endod 2011;37:1460-1464.
  4. Renton T. Prevention of iatrogenic inferior alveolar nerve injuries in relation to dental procedures. Dent Update 2010;37:350-352, 354-356, 358-360.
  5. Moon S, Lee SJ, Kim E, Lee CY. Hypoesthesia after IAN block anesthesia with lidocaine: management of mild to moderate nerve injury. Restor Dent Endod 2012;37:232-235. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.4.232
  6. Juodzbalys G, Wang HL, Sabalys G. Anatomy of mandibular vital structures. Part II: mandibular incisive canal, mental foramen and associated neurovascular bundles in relation with dental implantology. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2010;1:e3.
  7. von Arx T, Friedli M, Sendi P, Lozanoff S, Bornstein MM. Location and dimensions of the mental foramen: a radiographic analysis by using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2013;39:1522-1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.033
  8. Montagu MF. The direction and position of the mental foramen in the great apes and man. Am J Phys Anthropol 1954;12:503-518. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330120404
  9. Tebo HG, Telford IR. An analysis of the variations in position of the mental foramen. Anat Rec 1950;107:61-66.
  10. von Arx T. The mental foramen or "the crossroads of the mandible." An anatomic and clinical observation. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2013;123:205-225.
  11. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Gotoh K, Ariji E. Accessory mental foramen assessment using cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:289-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.010
  12. Iwanaga J, Watanabe K, Saga T, Tabira Y, Kitashima S, Kusukawa J, Yamaki K. Accessory mental foramina and nerves: Application to periodontal, periapical, and implant surgery. Clin Anat 2016;29:493-501. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22635
  13. Katakami K, Mishima A, Shiozaki K, Shimoda S, Hamada Y, Kobayashi K. Characteristics of accessory mental foramina observed on limited cone-beam computed tomography images. J Endod 2008;34:1441-1445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.033
  14. Sawyer DR, Kiely ML, Pyle MA. The frequency of accessory mental foramina in four ethnic groups. Arch Oral Biol 1998;43:417-420.
  15. Al-Mahalawy H, Al-Aithan H, Al-Kari B, Al-Jandan B, Shujaat S. Determination of the position of mental foramen and frequency of anterior loop in Saudi population. A retrospective CBCT study. Saudi Dent J 2017;29:29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.01.001
  16. Kalender A, Orhan K, Aksoy U. Evaluation of the mental foramen and accessory mental foramen in Turkish patients using cone-beam computed tomography images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program. Clin Anat 2012;25:584-592. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.21277
  17. Orhan AI, Orhan K, Aksoy S, Ozgul O, Horasan S, Arslan A, Kocyigit D. Evaluation of perimandibular neurovascularization with accessory mental foramina using cone-beam computed tomography in children. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24:e365-e369. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182902f49
  18. Alam MK, Alhabib S, Alzarea BK, Irshad M, Faruqi S, Sghaireen MG, Patil S, Basri R. 3D CBCT morphometric assessment of mental foramen in Arabic population and global comparison: imperative for invasive and non-invasive procedures in mandible. Acta Odontol Scand 2018;76:98-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2017.1387813
  19. Gumusok M, Akarslan ZZ, Basman A, ucok O. Evaluation of accessory mental foramina morphology with cone-beam computed tomography. Niger J Clin Pract 2017;20:1550-1554. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.187329
  20. Wei X, Gu P, Hao Y, Wang J. Detection and characterization of anterior loop, accessory mental foramen, and lateral lingual foramen by using cone beam computed tomography. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:365-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.026
  21. Alok A, Singh ID, Panat SR, Singh S, Kishore M, Jha A. Position and symmetry of mental foramen: A radiographic study in bareilly population. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2017;29:16-19. https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaomr.JIAOMR_69_16
  22. Bhagat J, Shah D, Fernandes G. Prevalence of the mental foramen location in an Indian subpopulation: a retrospective orthopantomogram study. Int J Oral Care Res 2018;6:89-92.
  23. Rowe AH. Damage to the inferior dental nerve during or following endodontic treatment. Br Dent J 1983;155:306-307. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805219
  24. Tsompanides G, Konstantinos I, Christos A, Lambrianidis T. The contribution of cone beam CT in the assessment and management of endodontic-related mental nerve paraesthesia: a report of two cases. ENDO 2014;8:63-70.
  25. Aminoshariae A, Su A, Kulild JC. Determination of the location of the mental foramen: a critical review. J Endod 2014;40:471-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.009
  26. Currie CC, Meechan JG, Whitworth JM, Carr A, Corbett IP. Determination of the mental foramen position in dental radiographs in 18-30year olds. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016;45:20150195.
  27. Ludlow JB, Laster WS, See M, Bailey LJ, Hershey HG. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:534-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.04.008
  28. Chong BS, Quinn A, Pawar RR, Makdissi J, Sidhu SK. The anatomical relationship between the roots of mandibular second molars and the inferior alveolar nerve. Int Endod J 2015;48:549-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12348
  29. Srivastava S, Patil RK, Tripathi A, Khanna V, Sharna P. Evaluation of Mental Foramen in U.P. population - A CBCT study. J Otolaryngol ENT Res 2017;8:00253.
  30. Swamy NN, Nagaraj T, Ghouse N, Jagadish CD, Sreelakshmi N, Goswami RD. Radiographic study of mental foramen type and position in Bangalore population. J Med Radiol Pathol Surg 2015;1:5-8. https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.jmrps.2
  31. Oliveira Junior EM, Araujo AL, da Silva CM, de Sousa-Rodrigues CF, de Lima FJ. Morphological and morphometric study of the mental foramen on the M-CP-18 jiachenjiang point. Int J Morphol 2009;27:231-238.
  32. Zhang L, Zheng Q, Zhou X, Lu Y, Huang D. Anatomic relationship between mental foramen and peripheral structures observed by cone-beam computed tomography. Anat Physiol 2015;5:182.
  33. dos Santos Oliveira R, Rodrigues Coutinho M, Kuhl Panzarella F. Morphometric analysis of the mental foramen using cone-beam computed tomography. Int J Dent 2018;2018:4571895.
  34. Alves FR, Coutinho MS, Goncalves LS. Endodontic-related facial paresthesia: systematic review. J Can Dent Assoc 2014;80:e13.
  35. Santini A, Alayan I. A comparative anthropometric study of the position of the mental foramen in three populations. Br Dent J 2012;212:E7.
  36. Pogrel MA. The results of microneurosurgery of the inferior alveolar and lingual nerve. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:485-489. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.31841
  37. Orstavik D, Brodin P, Aas E. Paraesthesia following endodontic treatment: survey of the literature and report of a case. Int Endod J 1983;16:167-172.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1983.tb01320.x
  38. Pogrel MA, Bryan J, Regezi J. Nerve damage associated with inferior alveolar nerve blocks. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:1150-1155.
  39. Afkhami F, Haraji A, Boostani HR. Radiographic localization of the mental foramen and mandibular canal. J Dent (Tehran) 2013;10:436-442.
  40. Sakdajeyont W, Chaiyasamut T, Arayasantiparb R, Wongsirichat N. The mental foramen in panoramic versus cone beam computed tomogram. Mo Dent J 2018;38:159-167.
  41. Phillips JL, Weller RN, Kulild JC. The mental foramen: 1. Size, orientation, and positional relationship to the mandibular second premolar. J Endod 1990;16:221-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81674-2
  42. Ngeow WC, Yuzawati Y. The location of the mental foramen in a selected Malay population. J Oral Sci 2003;45:171-175. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.45.171
  43. Concepcion M, Rankow HJ. Accessory branch of the mental nerve. J Endod 2000;26:619-620. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200010000-00010
  44. Zahedi S, Mostafavi M, Lotfirikan N. Anatomic study of mandibular posterior teeth using cone-beam computed tomography for endodontic surgery. J Endod 2018;44:738-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.016
  45. Amorim MM, Prado FB, Borini CB, Bittar TO, Volpato MC, Groppo FC, Caria PH. The mental foramen position in dentate and edentulous Brazilian's mandible. Int J Morphol 2008;26:981-987.
  46. Igbigbi PS, Lebona S. The position and dimensions of the mental foramen in adult Malawian mandibles. West Afr J Med 2005;24:184-189.
  47. Kqiku L, Weiglein A, Kamberi B, Hoxha V, Meqa K, Stadtler P. Position of the mental foramen in Kosovarian population. Coll Antropol 2013;37:545-549.
  48. Abbott PV. Lower lip paraesthesia following restoration of a second premolar tooth. Case report. Aust Dent J 1997;42:297-301.
  49. Wang X, Chen K, Wang S, Tiwari SK, Ye L, Peng L. Relationship between the mental foramen, mandibular canal, and the surgical access line of the mandibular posterior teeth: a cone beam computed tomographic analysis. J Endod 2017;43:1262-1266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.043