DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Role of Communication and Dialogue During Studies in Higher Education

  • 투고 : 2022.08.05
  • 발행 : 2022.08.30

초록

In modern society, the organization of the educational process plays an important role in education. Traditionally, it is through communication and dialogue between the teacher and the student that professional competence is acquired. As society develops, the demand in the global labor market changes and the requirements and criteria for specialists increase. Therefore, a new approach to managing the pedagogical interaction between a teacher and a student in the process of education in a higher educational institution allows a positive impact on the system of training specialists and opens up new prospects for the formation of competitive specialists. The issue of the quality of education is a key one and is covered in the documents regulating the process of educational activities. Also an important problem today is the transition to qualitatively new and innovative systems of training specialists and the departure from outdated models of managing pedagogical interaction in higher education institutions. The process of managing the pedagogical interaction between a teacher and a student is one of the most important for studying in the context of higher education. Thus, the main task of the study is to analyze the role of communication and dialogue during studies in higher education. As a result of the study, current trends and prerequisites for communication and dialogue tools during studies in higher education

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Roth K., Mollvik L., Alshoufani R., Adami R., Dineen K., Majlesi F., Peters M. & Tesar M. Philosophy of education in a new key: Constraints and possibilities in present times with regard to dignity, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1851189
  2. Helesh, A., Eremenko, O., & Kryshtanovych, M. Monitoring the quality of the work of experts when they conduct accreditation examinations of educational programs. Revista Tempos E Espacos Em Educacao, 2021, 14(33), e16535. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v14i33.16535
  3. Ruthven, K., Mercer, N., Taber, K.S., Guardia, P., Hofmann, R., Ilie, S., Riga, F. A research-informed dialogic-teaching approach to early secondary school mathematicsand science: The pedagogical design and field trial of the epiSTEMe intervention.Research Papers in Education, 2017, 32, 18-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2015.1129642
  4. Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M.. Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching. Educational Psychologist, 2013, 48, 114-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.775898
  5. Pehmer, A.K., Groschner, A., & Seidel, T. Fostering and scaffolding studentengagement in productive classroom discourse: Teachers' practice changes and reflections in light of teacher professional development. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2015, 7, 12-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.05.001
  6. Kryshtanovych, M., Kotyk, T., Tiurina, T., Kovrei, D., & Dzhanda, H. Pedagogical and Psychological Aspects of the Implementation of Model of the Value Attitude to Health. BRAIN.Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2021, 11(2Sup1), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/11.2Sup1/99
  7. Marek, M. & Wu, Wen-Chi & Chew, Chiou Sheng.. Teacher Experiences in Converting Classes to Distance Learning in the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies. 2021. 19. 40-60. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.20210101.oa3
  8. Fedorov, A. A., Mialkina, E. V., Sedykh, E. P. S., & Zhitkova, V. A.. Model of managing the professional-educational route of a future specialist. Revista Tempos E Espacos Em Educacao, 2021, 14(33), e16325. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v14i33.16325
  9. Kryshtanovych, M., Kryshtanovych, S., Chubinska, N., Khromova, Y.,& Sylkin, O. The System of Public Administration in Educational Institutions in Rural Regions in the Context of the Development of Educational Culture. Revista Brasileira De Educacao Do Campo, 2022, 7, e14140. https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.rbec.e14140
  10. Teelken, C. Teaching assessment and perceived quality of teaching: a longitudinal study among academics in three European countries, European Journal of Higher Education, 8:4, 382-399, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1490661
  11. Muhonen, H., Pakarinen, E., Poikkeus, A-M., Lerkkanen, M-K., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. Quality of educational dialogue and association with students' academic performance. Learning and Instruction, 2018, 55, 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.007
  12. Kryshtanovych M., Gavrysh I., Kholtobina O., Melnychuk I., Salnikova N. Prospects, Problems and Ways to Improve Distance Learning of Students of Higher Educational Institutions. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Mul tidimensionala. 2020, 12. No.2, 348-364. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.2/282
  13. Ochirov, G. Formation of professional competence of the future teachers of initial classes by student teaching means. Historical and social-educational ideas. 8. 205-208. 2016. https://doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2016-8-1/2-205-208
  14. Howe, C. & Hennessy, S. & Mercer, N. & Vrikki, M. & Wheatley, L.. Teacher-Student Dialogue During Classroom Teaching: Does It Really Impact on Student Outcomes?. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2019, 1-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730
  15. Shevchenko, Y., Moskalyova, L., Kanarova, O., & Poznanska, O. Development of a System for Improving Future Teachers' Readiness for the Child's Spiritual and Moral Development in a Cross-Cultural Space. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 2019. 8(4), 251-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i4.2352