DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Development and Validation of the Workplace Bullying Bystander Behavior Scale

직장 내 괴롭힘 주변인 행동 척도 개발 및 타당화 연구

  • 최소영 (이화여자대학교 심리학과) ;
  • 이승연 (이화여자대학교 심리학과)
  • Received : 2022.01.28
  • Accepted : 2022.03.20
  • Published : 2022.05.31

Abstract

This study was conducted with the aim of developing and validating a measure of the workplace bullying bystander behavior. For the purpose, items were developed by referring to previous studies related to workplace bullying, and behavior subtypes were defined as pro-bullying, defending, and bystander behaviors. After confirming the content validity with the help of experts, a total of 31 preliminary items were composed. The final 26 items were selected by conducting an exploratory factor analysis and verifying the validity and reliability of the scale with a survey of 288 office workers who have directly or indirectly witnessed workplace bullying over the past three years. In this process, it was confirmed that defense behavior was distinguished into two types: Active and supportive. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted with data from 518 office workers who have directly or indirectly witnessed workplace bullying over the past year, and the validity and reliability of the developed scale were confirmed. As a result of comparing the competing models to reconfirm the subtypes, it was confirmed again that active defense behavior and supportive defense behavior were distinguished. The criterion-related validity of all subtypes was confirmed by setting the criterion variables for workplace bullying behavior, altruistic behavior, pro-social behavior, fear of intervention, moral disengagement, guilt, and moral identity. Based on the result of this study, follow-up research tasks related to workplace bullying bystander behavior scale were suggested and the methods to prevent and intervene in workplace bullying while utilizing workplace bullying bystander behaviors were discussed.

본 연구는 직장 내 괴롭힘 주변인 행동을 측정하는 척도를 개발하고 타당화하는 것을 목적으로 실시되었다. 이를 위해 직장 내 괴롭힘 관련 선행연구를 참고하여 문항을 개발하고, 친가해행동, 방어행동, 방관행동으로 하위유형을 규정하였다. 전문가를 통한 내용 타당도 확인 후 총 31문항의 예비문항을 구성하였다. 지난 3년간 직장 내 괴롭힘을 직·간접적으로 목격한 민간기업 사무직 직장인 288명의 설문자료로 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하여 최종문항 26개를 선정하였으며, 이 과정에서 방어행동이 적극적 유형과 지지적 유형 두 가지 구인으로 변별됨이 확인되었다. 지난 1년간 직장 내 괴롭힘을 직·간접적으로 목격한 민간기업 사무직 직장인 518명의 자료로 확인적 요인분석을 실시하고 개발된 척도의 타당성과 신뢰성을 확인하였다. 하위유형의 재확인을 위해 경쟁모형 비교를 실시한 결과 적극적 방어행동과 지지적 방어행동이 변별됨이 재차 확인되었다. 직장 내 괴롭힘 가해행동, 조직 내 이타적 행동, 친 사회적 행동, 개입에의 공포, 도덕적 이탈, 죄책감, 도덕적 정체성의 준거변인을 설정하여 모든 하위유형의 준거 관련 타당도를 확인하였다. 본 연구의 결과로 직장 내 괴롭힘 주변인 행동과 관련된 후속 연구 과제와 직장 내 괴롭힘 예방 및 개입에 있어 주변인 행동을 활용할 방안에 대해 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국가인권위원회 (2017). 직장 내 괴롭힘 실태조사 연구용역보고서. http://workright.jinbo.net/xe/pds/57457에서 인출
  2. 김수영 (2016). 구조방정식 모형의 기본과 확장. 서울: 학지사.
  3. 김아영 (2018). 정의적 척도개발. 2018 하계심리검사 워크숍 자료집. (주)한국교육 & 심리연구소. 서울.
  4. 김현수, 윤희장, 곽은미 (2018). 간호사의 직장 내 폭력상황 대처경험. 문화기술의 융합(JCCT), 4(4), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2018.4.4.233
  5. 남상희 (2019). 도덕적 이탈 경향성과 비윤리적 행동 간 관계: 구성원 간 친밀성 지각의 조절효과. 서강대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  6. 남웅, 김지원, 김용규, 구정완, 박정일 (2010). 간호사의 직장 내 약자 괴롭힘 설문도구의 신뢰도와 타당도. 대한직업환경의학회지, 22(2), 129-139.
  7. 류경희 (2006). 청소년 집단 따돌림에서 동조행동의 영향 변인. 대한가정학회지, 44(12), 139-154.
  8. 류영주, 양수진 (2017). 내재적.친사회적 동기와 삶 만족도의 관계에서 그릿(Grit)과 친사회적 행동의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 30(4), 93-115.
  9. 사람인 (2021, 6) 직장 내 괴롭힘 금지법 2년 직장인 78%, 변화 체감 못해 https://www.saramin.co.kr/zf_user/help/live/view?idx=108301&list_idx=0&listType=news&category=10&keyword=%EA%B4%B4%EB%A1%AD%ED%9E%98&menu=1&page=1에서 인출
  10. 송경희 (2017). 초등학생, 중학생의 도덕 추론과 또래괴롭힘 방어행동: 개인 및 학급 수준특성의 조절효과. 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  11. 송경희, 이승연 (2010). 청소년의 마음읽기 능력과 또래괴롭힘의 관계: 도덕적 이탈, 도덕적 정서의 매개효과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 23(3), 105-124.
  12. 송수민 (2007). 수치심경향성과 죄책감경향성의 비교: 심리적 특성과 상황적 변인에 따른 차이. 한양대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  13. 심희옥 (2008). 또래 괴롭힘 참여자의 사회적 지위 및 사회적 정서에 관한 연구: 성별을 중심으로. 아동학회지, 29(3), 191-205.
  14. 윤정민, 이승연 (2021). 20, 30대의 직장 내 괴롭힘 피해경험과 전위된 공격성 간의 관계: 지각된 조직불공정성과 상태분노의 이중매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 27(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.20406/KJCS.2021.2.27.1.1
  15. 이인태 (2016). 도덕적 정체성 측정 도구들의 특징과 활용방법. 도덕윤리과교육연구, 50, 1-27.
  16. 최소영 (2021). 직장 내 괴롭힘의 주변인 행동척도개발 및 방어행동 기제 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  17. 최소영, 전희선, 이승연 (2017). 남녀 사무직 직장인의 특성분노, 사회적 회피, 직장 내 괴롭힘 피해 간 관계. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 23(1), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.24230/KSIOP.23.1.201003.53
  18. 한봉주 (2010). 조직문화와 리더십이 구성원의 행태에 미치는 영향 연구: 조직유형별 비교. 한국행정연구, 19(1), 201-240. https://doi.org/10.22897/KIPAJN.2010.19.1.009
  19. Al-Ghabeesh, S. H., & Qattom, H. (2019). Workplace bullying and its preventive measures and productivity among emergency department nurses. Israel journal of health policy research, 8(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-018-0272-6
  20. Baez-Leon, C., Moreno-Jimenez, B., Aguirre Camacho, A., & Olmos, R. (2016). Factors influencing intention to help and helping behaviour in witnesses of bullying in nursing settings. Nursing Inquiry, 23(4), 358-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12149
  21. Barchia, K., & Bussey, K. (2011). Individual and collective social cognitive influences on peer aggression: Exploring the contribution of aggression efficacy, moral disengagement, and collective efficacy. Aggressive Behavior, 37(2), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20375
  22. Barriga, A. Q., Morrison, E. M., Liau, A. K., & Gibbs, J. C. (2001). Moral cognition: Explaining the gender difference in antisocial behavior. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 47(14), 532-562. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2001.0020
  23. Bartlett, J. E., & Bartlett, M. E. (2011). Workplace bullying: An integrative literature review. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422311410651
  24. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate behavioral research, 1(2), 245-276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
  25. Cho, Y., & Chung, O. B. (2012). A mediated moderation model of conformative peer bullying. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21(3), 520-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9538-0
  26. Coyne, I., Gopaul, A. M., Campbell, M., Pankasz, A., Garland, R., & Cousans, F. (2019). Bystander responses to bullying at work: The role of mode, type and relationship to target. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(3), 813-827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3692-2
  27. D'Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2011). The limits to workplace friendship: Managerialist HRM and bystander behaviour in the context of workplace bullying. Employee Relations, 33(3), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425451111121777
  28. De Cuyper, N., Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2009). Job insecurity, perceived employability and targets' and perpetrators' experiences of workplace bullying. Work and Stress, 23(3), 206-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370903257578
  29. Dehue, F., Bolman, C., Vollink, T., & Pouwelse, M. (2012). Coping with bullying at work and health related problems. International Journal of Stress Management, 19(3), 175-197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028969
  30. Desrumaux, P., Jeoffrion, C., Bouterfas, N., De Bosscher, S., & Boudenghan, M. C. (2018). Workplace bullying: How do bystanders' emotions and the type of bullying influence their willingness to help?. Nordic Psychology, 70(4), 259-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2018.1430610
  31. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Factor analysis. Scale development, theory and applications. Applied Social Research Methods Series, 26, 10-137.
  32. Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.). (2003). Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis.
  33. Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work and Stress, 23(1), 24-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370902815673
  34. Einarsen, S., Skogstad, A., Rorvik, E., Lande, A. B., & Nielsen, M. B. (2018). Climate for conflict management, exposure to workplace bullying and work engagement: A moderated mediation analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(3), 549-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1164216
  35. Elphick, C., Minhas, R., & Shaw, J. (2020, June 18). Everybody knows: The importance of speaking up about witnessed workplace harassment and discrimination.
  36. Gao, J., Greenberg, R., & Wong-On-Wing, B. (2015). Whistleblowing intentions of lower-level employees: The effect of reporting channel, bystanders, and wrongdoer power status. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(1), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2008-4
  37. Garandeau, C. F., Vermande, M. M., Reijntjes, A. H., & Aarts, E. (2019). Classroom bullying norms and peer status: Effects on victim-oriented and bully-oriented defending. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 0165025419894722.
  38. Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., Borghi, F., & Franzoni, L. (2008). The role of bystanders in students' perception of bullying and sense of safety. Journal of School Psychology, 46(6), 617-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.02.001
  39. Glaso, L., & Notelaers, G. (2012). Workplace bullying, emotions, and outcomes. Violence and victims, 27(3), 360-377. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.27.3.360
  40. Gummerum, M., Van Dillen, L. F., Van Dijk, E., & Lopez-Perez, B. (2016). Costly third-party interventions: The role of incidental anger and attention focus in punishment of the perpetrator and compensation of the victim. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.04.004
  41. Hechler, S., & Kessler, T. (2018). On the difference between moral outrage and empathic anger: Anger about wrongful deeds or harmful consequences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 270-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.005
  42. Hellemans, C., Dal Cason, D., & Casini, A. (2017). Bystander Helping Behavior in Response to Workplace Bullying. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 76(4), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000200
  43. Hershcovis, M. S., Neville, L., Reich, T. C., Christie, A. M., Cortina, L. M., & Shan, J. V. (2017). Witnessing wrongdoing: The effects of observer power on incivility intervention in the workplace. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 142, 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.07.006
  44. Huitsing, G., Snijders, T. A., Van Duijn, M. A., & Veenstra, R. (2014). Victims, bullies, and their defenders: A longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive and negative networks. Development and Psychopathology, 26(3), 645-659. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000297
  45. Johnston, M., & Krettenauer, T. (2011). Moral self and moral emotion expectancies as predictors of anti-and prosocial behaviour in adolescence: A case for mediation?. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8(2), 228-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405621003619945
  46. Killer, B., Bussey, K., Hawes, D. J., & Hunt, C. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth. Aggressive Behavior. 45(4), 450-462. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21833
  47. Kim, K. (2020). Exploring the influence of workplace violence and bystander behaviour on patient safety in Korea: A pilot study. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(3), 735-743. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12991
  48. Kivimaki, M., Virtanen, M., Vartia, M., Elovainio, M., Vahtera, J., & Keltikangas-Jarvinen, L. (2003). Workplace bullying and the risk of cardiovascular disease and depression. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(10), 779-783. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.60.10.779
  49. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3. Baski). New York, NY: Guilford.
  50. Linstead, S. (2013). Organizational bystanding: Whistleblowing, watching the work go by or aiding and abetting? Management, 16(5), 680-696.
  51. MacCurtain, S., Murphy, C., O'sullivan, M., MacMahon, J., & Turner, T. (2018). To stand back or step in? Exploring the responses of employees who observe workplace bullying. Nursing Inquiry, 25(1), 1-10.
  52. Madden, C., & Loh, J. (2020). Workplace cyberbullying and bystander helping behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(19), 2434-2458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1449130
  53. Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2004). Psychiatric distress and symptoms of PTSD among victims of bullying at work. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 32(3), 335-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880410001723558
  54. Mazzone, A., Camodeca, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2016). Interactive effects of guilt and moral disengagement on bullying, defending and outsider behavior. Journal of Moral Education, 45(4), 419-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2016.1216399
  55. McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. P. (2013). Instrument development in the affective domain: School and corporate applications.. New York, NY: Springer.
  56. Meter, D. J., Ma, T. L., & Ehrenreich, S. E. (2019). Telling, comforting, and retaliating: The roles of moral disengagement and perception of harm in defending college-aged victims of peer victimization. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1(2), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-018-0006-x
  57. Mitchell, M. S., Vogel, R. M., & Folger, R. (2015). Third parties' reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1040-1055. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000002
  58. Moore, C., Detert, J. R., Klebe Trevino, L., Baker, V. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01237.x
  59. Mulder, R., Bos, A. E., Pouwelse, M., & van Dam, K. (2017). Workplace mobbing: How the victim's coping behavior influences bystander responses. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2016.1152213
  60. Mulder, R., Pouwelse, M., Lodewijkx, H., & Bolman, C. (2014). Workplace mobbing and bystanders' helping behaviour towards victims: The role of gender, perceived responsibility and anticipated stigma by association. International Journal of Psychology, 49(4), 304-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12018
  61. Ng, K., Niven, K., & Hoel, H. (2019). 'I could help, but...': A dynamic sensemaking model of workplace bullying bystanders. Human Relations, 1-29.
  62. Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556. https://doi.org/10.2307/256591
  63. Nielson, M. G., Padilla-Walker, L., & Holmes, E. K. (2017). How do men and women help? Validation of a multidimensional measure of prosocial behavior. Journal of Adolescence, 56, 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.02.006
  64. Niven, K., Ng, K., & Hoel, H. (2020). The bystanders of workplace bullying. Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Theory, Research and Practice. In Einarsen, S. V., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.). Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Theory, research and practice(pp. 385-404). CA: CRC Press.
  65. Notelaers, G., Van der Heijden, B., Hoel, H., & Einarsen, S. (2019). Measuring bullying at work with the short-negative acts questionnaire: identification of targets and criterion validity. Work & Stress, 33(1), 58-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2018.1457736
  66. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory: 2d. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  67. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
  68. Patrick, R. B., Rote, W. M., Gibbs, J. C., & Basinger, K. S. (2019). Defend, stand by, or join in?: the relative influence of moral identity, moral judgment, and social self-efficacy on adolescents' bystander behaviors in bullying situations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(10), 2051-2064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01089-w
  69. Paull, M., Omari, M., & Standen, P. (2012). When is a bystander not a bystander? A typology of the roles of bystanders in workplace bullying. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50(3), 351-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7941.2012.00027.x
  70. Paull, M., Omari, M., D'Cruz, P., & Guneri Cangarli, B. (2020). Bystanders in workplace bullying: working university students' perspectives on action versus inaction. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 58(3), 313-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12216
  71. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
  72. Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A Meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs' effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41(1). 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087375
  73. Pouwelse M, Mulder R, Mikkelsen EG. (2018). The role of bystanders in workplace bullying: an overview of theories and empirical research. In: D'Cruz P et al. (eds) Pathways of job-related negative behaviour. Handbooks of workplace bullying, emotional abuse and harassment, Springer Singapore, 1-39.
  74. Poyhonen, V., Juvonen, J., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). Standing up for the victim, siding with the bully or standing by? Bystander responses in bullying situations. Social Development, 21(4), 722-741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00662.x
  75. Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(6), 815-827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9
  76. Pronk, J., Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., & Krabbendam, L. (2019). Differences in adolescents' motivations for indirect, direct, and hybrid peer defending. Social Development, 28(2), 414-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12348
  77. Raboteg-Saric, Z., & Bartakovic, S. (2019). Empathy and moral disengagement as predictors of bystander roles in school bullying. Central European Journal of Paediatrics, 15(2), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.5457/p2005-114.248
  78. Reijntjes, A., Vermande, M., Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., Aleva, L., & van der Meulen, M. (2016). Defending victimized peers: Opposing the bully, supporting the victim, or both?. Aggressive Behavior, 42(6), 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21653
  79. Rodriguez-Munoz, A., Baillien, E., De Witte, H., Moreno-Jimenez, B., & Pastor, J. C. (2009). Cross-lagged relationships between workplace bullying, job satisfaction and engagement: Two longitudinal studies. Work & Stress, 23(3), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370903227357
  80. Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22(4), 453-459. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1999.0239
  81. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T
  82. Samnani, A. K. (2013). "Is this bullying?" Understanding target and witness reactions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(3), 290-305. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941311321196
  83. Sandstrom, M. J., & Bartini, M. (2010). Do perceptions of discrepancy between self and group norms contribute to peer harassment at school?. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(3), 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2010.495645
  84. Scully, M., & Rowe, M. (2009). Bystander training within organizations. Journal of the International Ombudsman Association, 2(1), 1-9.
  85. Skarlicki, D. P., & Kulik, C. T. (2004). Third-party reactions to employee (mis) treatment: A justice perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 183-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(04)26005-1
  86. Sutton, J., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 25(2), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)25:2<97::AID-AB3>3.0.CO;2-7
  87. Tangney, J. P., Dearing, R., Wagner, P. E., & Gramzow, R. (2000). The Test of Self-Conscious Affect-3 (TOSCA-3). George Mason University. Fairfax, VA.
  88. Thornberg, R., & Jungert, T. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 36(3), 475-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003
  89. Thornberg, R., Tenenbaum, L., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., Jungert, T., & Vanegas, G. (2012). Bystander motivation in bullying incidents: To intervene or not to intervene?. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13(3), 247-252. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2012.3.11792
  90. van Heugten, K. (2011). Theorizing active bystanders as change agents in workplace bullying of social workers. Families in Society, 92(2), 219-224. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.4090
  91. Wu, S. H., & Wu, C. C. (2019). Bullying bystander reactions: A case study in the Taiwanese workplace. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 57(2), 191-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12175