Archives of Plastic Surgery

  • 제49권3호
  • /
  • Pages.373-377
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2234-6163(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6171(eISSN)
대한성형외과학회 (Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Single-Port Transaxillary Robot-Assisted Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap Reconstruction for Poland Syndrome: Concomitant Application of Robotic System to Contralateral Augmentation Mammoplasty

  • Hwang, Yong-Jae (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Chung, Jae-Ho (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Hyung-Chul (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Park, Seung-Ha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Yoon, Eul-Sik (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital)
  • 발행 : 2022.05.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Currently, robot-assisted latissimus dorsi muscle flap (RLDF) surgery is used in treating patients with Poland syndrome and for breast reconstruction. However, conventional RLDF surgery has several inherent issues. We resolved the existing problems of the conventional system by introducing the da Vinci single-port system in patients with Poland syndrome. Overall, three patients underwent RLDF surgery using the da Vinci single-port system with gas insufflation. In the female patient, after performing RLDF with silicone implant, augmentation mammoplasty was also performed on the contralateral side. Both surgeries were performed as single-port robotic-assisted surgery through the transaxillary approach. The mean operating time was 449 (335-480) minutes; 8.67 (4-14) minutes were required for docking and 59 (52-67) minutes for robotic dissection and LD harvesting. No patients had perioperative complication and postoperative problems related to gas inflation. The single-port robot-assisted surgical system overcomes the drawbacks of previous robotic surgery in patients with Poland syndrome, significantly shortens the procedure time of robotic surgery, has superior cosmetic outcomes in a surgical scar, and improves the operator's convenience. Furthermore, concurrent application to another surgery demonstrates the possibility in the broad application of the robotic single-port surgical system.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn SJ, Song SY, Park HS, et al. Early experiences with robot-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2019;46(01):79-83 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.00052
  2. Ciudad P, Date S, Lee MH, et al. Robotic harvest of a right gastroepiploic lymph node flap. Arch Plast Surg 2016;43(02):210-212 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2016.43.2.210
  3. Song HG, Yun IS, Lee WJ, Lew DH, Rah DK. Robot-assisted free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2013;40(04):353-358 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.4.353
  4. Jeon DN, Kim J, Ko BS, et al. Robot-assisted breast reconstruction using the prepectoral anterior tenting method. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021;74(11):2906-2915 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.120
  5. Selber JC. The robotic DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145(02):340-343 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006529
  6. Moon KC, Yeo HD, Yoon ES, et al. Robotic-assisted latissimus dorsi muscle flap for autologous chest reconstruction in Poland syndrome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020;73(08):1506-1513 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.01.030
  7. Chung JH, You HJ, Kim HS, Lee BI, Park SH, Yoon ES. A novel technique for robot assisted latissimus dorsi flap harvest. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68(07):966-972 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.03.021
  8. Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger FC. Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129(06):1305-1312 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824ecc0b
  9. Winocour S, Tarassoli S, Chu CK, Liu J, Clemens MW, Selber JC. Comparing outcomes of robotically assisted latissimus dorsi harvest to the traditional open approach in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;146(06):1221-1225 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007368
  10. Houvenaeghel G, Bannier M, Rua S, et al. Robotic breast and reconstructive surgery: 100 procedures in 2-years for 80 patients. Surg Oncol 2019;31:38-45 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2019.09.005
  11. Joo OY, Song SY, Park HS, Roh TS. Single-port robot-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction with the da Vinci SP Surgical System: first clinical report. Arch Plast Surg 2021;48(02):194-198 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.01557
  12. Lee H, Lee J, Lee K, Kim JY, Park HS. Comparison between gasless and gas-inflated robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Breast Cancer 2021;24(02):183-195 https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2021.24.e20
  13. Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, et al. Circulatory and respiratory complications of carbon dioxide insufflation. Dig Surg 2004;21(02):95-105 https://doi.org/10.1159/000077038