DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research on the optimization method for PGNAA system design based on Signal-to-Noise Ratio evaluation

  • Li, JiaTong (School of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou University) ;
  • Jia, WenBao (Institute of Nuclear Analytical Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics) ;
  • Hei, DaQian (School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University) ;
  • Yao, Zeen (School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University) ;
  • Cheng, Can (Institute of Nuclear Analytical Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics)
  • Received : 2021.09.14
  • Accepted : 2021.12.26
  • Published : 2022.06.25

Abstract

In this research, for improving the measurement performance of Prompt Gamma-ray Neutron Activation Analysis (PGNAA) set-up, a new optimization method for set-up design was proposed and investigated. At first, the calculation method for Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) was proposed. Since the SNR could be calculated and quantified accurately, the SNR was chosen as the evaluation parameter in the new optimization method. For discussing the feasibility of the SNR optimization method, two kinds of PGNAA set-ups were designed in the MCNP code, based on the SNR optimization method and the previous signal optimization method, respectively. Meanwhile, the single element spectra analysis method was proposed, and the analysis effect of single element spectra as well as element sensitivity were used for comparing the measurement performance. Since the simulation results showed the better measurement performance of set-up designed by SNR optimization method, the experimental set-ups were built for the further testing, finally demonstrating the feasibility of the SNR optimization method for PGNAA setup design.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was a project funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11975121, 11775113 and 12105143) and National Safety Academic Fund (U1930125).

References

  1. B. Maroti, L. Szentmiklosi, T. Belgya, Comparison of low-energy and coaxial HPGe detectors for prompt gamma activation analysis of metallic samples, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 310 (2016) 743-749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-016-4822-5
  2. A.Y. Sun, W.B. Jia, J.T. Li, D.Q. Hei, W.H. Dai, C. Cheng, Method for accurate position detection of landmine based on PGNAA technology, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 320 (2019) 323-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06498-6
  3. K. Oh, Neutronic design of pulsed neutron facility (PNF) for PGNAA studies of biological samples, Nucl. Eng. Technol. (2021). In press.
  4. L. Szentmiklosi, Z. Kis, Characterizing nuclear materials hidden in lead containers by neutron-tomography-driven prompt gamma activation imaging (PGAI-NT), Anal. Methods 7 (2015) 3157-3163. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5AY00199D
  5. M. Abdelati, A. Abdelsalam, S.E. Mongy, Design of a novel Nondestructive portable mobile neutron activation system, Measurement 114 (2017) 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.09.005
  6. Zs Revay, Construction and characterization of the redesigned PGAA facility at the University of Texas at Austin, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 577 (2007) 611-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.04.119
  7. R.P. Gardner, A feasibility study of a coincidence counting approach for PGNAA applications, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 53 (2000) 515-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(00)00206-2
  8. M. Gierlik, S. Borsuk, Z. Guzik, J. Iwanowska, L. Kazmierczak, S. Korolczuk, Application of the anti-Compton detector in neutron activation analysis techniques, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 788 (2015) 54-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2015.03.051
  9. R. Acharya, P.K. Pujari, Potential of conventional and internal monostandard NAA and PGNAA and PIGE in forensic sciences: an overview, Forensic Chemistry 12 (2018) 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forc.2018.01.002
  10. J.T. Li, W.B. Jia, D.Q. Hei, C. Cheng, P.K. Cai, Research on the NIQAS device for hazardous goods identification based on PGNAA technology, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 169 (2021) 109445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109445
  11. E. Mauerhofer, A. Havenith, J. Kettler, Prompt gamma neutron activation analysis of a 200 L steel drum homogeneously filled with concrete, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 309 (2016) 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-016-4768-7
  12. L. Zhao, X. Xu, J.B. Lu, Y.L. Gong, X.L. Li, W. Zhang, Q.M. Shang, Q.F. Song, Y.F. Li, Study on element detection and its correction in iron ore concentrate based on a prompt gamma-neutron activation analysis system, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 30 (2019) 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-019-0579-1
  13. R. Bedogni, A. Pietropaolo, J.M. Gomezros, The thermal neutron facility HOTNES: theoretical design, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 127 (2017) 68-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.05.003
  14. J. Ghassoun, D. Mostacci, A compact neutron beam generator system designed for prompt gamma nuclear activation analysis, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 69 (2011) 1138-1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.11.014
  15. J.A. Robinson, M.R. Hartman, S.R. Reese, Design, construction and characterization of a prompt gamma activation analysis facility at the Oregon state university triga ®, reactor, J. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 283 (2010) 359-369.
  16. Z. Revay, P. Kudejova, K. Kleszcz, S. Sollradl, C. Genreith, In-beam activation analysis facility at MLZ, Garching, Nucl. Instrum. Methods, Phys. Res. A. 799 (2015) 114-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2015.07.063
  17. D.Q. Hei, Z. Jiang, W.B. Jia, C. Cheng, H.T. Wang, J.T. Li, The background influence of cadmium detection in saline water using PGNAA technique, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 310 (2016) 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-016-4887-1
  18. J.T. Li, W.B. Jia, D.Q. Hei, Y.J. Tang, C. Cheng, P.K. Cai, Design of the explosion-proof detection integrated system based on PGNAA technology, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 322 (2019) 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06667-7
  19. Y.S. Ling, W.B. Jia, D.Q. Hei, Q. Shan, C. Cheng, H.J. Zhang, A new Am-Be PGNAA setup for element determination in aqueous solution, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 95 (2015) 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.11.005
  20. J.T. Li, W.B. Jia, D.Q. Hei, P.K. Cai, C. Cheng, Y.J. Tang, The optimization of coal on-line analysis system based on signal-to-noise ratio evaluation, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 318 (2018) 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6171-z
  21. A. Kavetskiy, G. Yakubova, H.A. Torbert, S.A. Prior, Continuous versus pulse neutron induced gamma spectroscopy for soil carbon analysis, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 96 (2015) 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.10.024
  22. G. Yakubova, A. Kavetskiy, S.A. Prior, H.A. Torbert, Applying Monte-Carlo simulations to optimize an inelastic neutron scattering system for soil carbon analysis, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 128 (2017) 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.07.003