DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Feasibility of Touch-Based Cognitive Training Games in Community Elderly and Elderly with Minor Dementia

  • 투고 : 2022.05.24
  • 심사 : 2022.06.22
  • 발행 : 2022.06.30

초록

Objective: The purpose of this study is to select a cognitive training game that can evaluate five cognitive domains and to study their validity with existing cognitive evaluation tools. Design: Methods: Delphi survey was conducted through the 2nd questionnaire for 30 experts to select games suitable for training 5 cognitive domains. Five cognitive training games and Mini Mental State Examination - Korea(MMSE-K), and cognitive impairment screening test(CIST) were conducted for 82 elderly in the community. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to find out the correlation of the three tests. The ROC curve was used to calculate the selection criteria for the game results for the screening evaluation of the presence or absence of mild cognitive impairment. Results: The coefficient of variation to evaluate the stability of the Delphi survey was less than 0.50 in most game items. The 'correct answers' and 'level' of the five final selected game items showed a statistically significant positive correlation with the CIST and MMSE-K scores. CIST score and 'time' of all game items except 'number making_time' showed a statistically significant negative correlation. Conclusions: The validity of the cognitive training program using smart devices was evaluated, and the criteria for classifying the cognitive domain and distinguishing the presence or absence of cognitive impairment were confirmed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-Mental State." A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J psychiatry Res. 1975;12(3):189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
  2. Lee MH, Kim ES. The effects of forest education on children's attentiveness. Journal of the Korean Society for Eco Early Childhood Education 2011;11(3):149-70.
  3. Zelazo PD, Craik FI, Booth L. Executive function across the life span. Acta psychologica 2004;115(2-3):167-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.12.005
  4. Del Grande JJ. Can grade two children's spatial perception be improved by inserting a transformation geometry component into their mathematics program. University of Toronto 1987.
  5. Flower W. Infant and child care. Boston: Allyn & Bacon 1980.
  6. Baddeley A. Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2003;4:829-839. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201
  7. Kwon YS, Baek KS. Factors associated with Cognitive Decline in the Elderly in Community. Journal of Digital Convergence 2014;12(2):587-94 https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.2.587
  8. Kong ES, Kim EJ. Effects of the integrative cognitive training program on elderly cognitive function. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association 2014;14(9):332-42. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.09.332
  9. Park SJ. Evaluating a VR-Serious Game According to an Integrated Approach for the Treatment of Psychological Disorders of the Elderly. The Society for Cognitive Enhancement and Intervention 2021;12(2):171-88. https://doi.org/10.21197/JCEI.12.2.9
  10. Moon JH, Won YS. Effects of cognitive training using tablet pc applications on cognitive function, daily living and satisfaction in subacute stroke patients. The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences 2017;12(1):219-28. https://doi.org/10.13067/JKIECS.2017.12.1.219
  11. Gordon, Theodore Jay. "The delphi method." Futures research methodology 2.3 (1994): 1-30.
  12. Lee JS (2001): Delphi method. Kyoyookbook, Paju, pp. 7-49
  13. Lee JS. A Methodological Evaluation of Delphi Forecast Procedures and Products in A Field Study Situation . University of Minnesota, 1977
  14. Lee SW. A study on the usefulness of Delphi technology prediction technique. Doctor's Degree. Chonbuk National University1987.
  15. Rowe G, Wright G, Bolger F. Delphi A Reevaluation of Research and Theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 1991;39(3):235-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(91)90039-I
  16. Woudenberg F. An evaluation of Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 1991;40(2):131-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(91)90002-W
  17. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology 1975;28(4): 563-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  18. Noh WK, Cho NY, Lee HW. A Study on Tutoring Evaluation Program with Delphi Survey. Humanities and Social Sciences Research 2013;14(2):313-48.
  19. Kader G, Franklin C. The evolution of Pearson's correlation coefficient. The Mathematics Teacher 2008;102(4): 292-9. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.102.4.0292
  20. Greiner M, Pfeiffer D, Smith RD. Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Preventive veterinary medicine 2000;45(1-2): 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00115-X
  21. Lee HS, Development and Feasibility Study of the Korean Senior Citizenship Connection Test, Master's Degree thesis at Sungkyunkwan University, 2006.