DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Agrifood consumer competency and organic food purchase intentions according to food-related lifestyle: based on data the 2019 Consumer Behavior Survey for Food

  • Kim, Eun-kyung (National Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kwon, Yong-seok (National Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Sena (National Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Young (National Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Park, Young Hee (National Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Received : 2021.03.22
  • Accepted : 2021.11.03
  • Published : 2022.08.01

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The increased consumers' interests in health and food safety have increased the demand for organic foods. Many studies have been performed on consumers' purchase intentions for organic foods and their influencing factors, and various studies have shown that the prices of organic foods and the consumers' willingness to pay are important influencing factors. This study examined the payment value of organic foods and agrifood consumer competency index according to the food-related lifestyles in South Korean consumers. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed using the 2019 Consumer Behavior Survey for Food. A total of 6,176 participants aged 19 to 74 years (male: 2,783, female: 3,393) were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Three factors were extracted by factor analysis (rational consumption-seeking type, convenience-seeking type, and health, and safety-seeking type) to explain the consumers' food-related lifestyles. The results of cluster analysis suggested that consumers were classified into 3 food-related lifestyles as the 'exploratory consumers' (n = 2,485), 'safety-seeking consumers' (n = 1,544), and 'passive consumers' (n = 2,147). Exploratory consumers showed a significantly higher willingness to pay for imported organic foods (P < 0.05). Safety-seeking consumers had a significantly higher willingness to pay for domestic organic foods (P < 0.05). For the agrifood consumer competency index, exploratory consumers had the highest score, followed in order by safety-seeking consumers and passive consumers. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide basic data in understanding consumption tendency for organic foods and agrifoods based on food-related lifestyles of South Korean consumers.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was carried out with the support of "Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ014709)" Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

References

  1. Salleh MM, Ali SM, Harun EH, Jalil MA, Shaharudin MR. Consumer's perception and purchase intentions towards organic food products: exploring attitude among academician. Can Soc Sci 2010;6:119-29.
  2. Lee SH, Ryoo JY, Lee MA. Analysis of food choice motivation according to health consciousness of overseas consumers: focus on American and Japanese consumers. J Nutr Health 2020;53:431-44. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2020.53.4.431
  3. Paul J, Rana J. Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food. J Consum Mark 2012;29:412-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761211259223
  4. Megicks P, Memery J, Williams J. Influences on ethical and socially responsible shopping: evidence from the UK grocery sector. J Mark Manage 2008;24:637-59. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725708X326039
  5. Kumar S, Ali J, editors. Analyzing the factors affecting consumer awareness on organic foods in India. Proceedings of the 21st annual IFAMA world forum and symposium on the road to 2050; 2011 Jun 20-23 Frankfurt, Germany.
  6. Grunert KG, Brunso K, Bredahl L, Bech AC. Food-related lifestyle: a segmentation approach to European food consumers. In: Frewer LJ, Risvik E, Schifferstein H, editors. Food, People and Society. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2001. p. 211-230.
  7. Kim S, Lee K, Lee Y. Selection attributes of home meal replacement by food-related lifestyles of single-person households in South Korea. Food Qual Prefer 2018;66:44-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.01.004
  8. Yeo GE, Cho MS, Oh J. Food-related lifestyle segmentation and beverage attribute' selection: toward understanding of sugar-reduced beverages choice. Br Food J 2020;122:3663-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-10-2019-0817
  9. Heo SJ, Bae HJ. Analysis of the consumption pattern of delivery food according to food-related lifestyle. J Nutr Health 2020;53:547-61. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2020.53.5.547
  10. Yi NY, Choi BR, Chang HJ. Opinion of commercialization of ready-to-eat Korean foods by food-related lifestyle segments in Koreans and non-Koreans. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2016;45:602-12. https://doi.org/10.3746/JKFN.2016.45.4.602
  11. Rana J, Paul J. Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food: a review and research agenda. J Retailing Consum Serv 2017;38:157-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.06.004
  12. Chen MF. Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions in relation to organic foods in Taiwan: moderating effects of food-related personality traits. Food Qual Prefer 2007;18:1008-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.04.004
  13. Vidgen HA, Gallegos D. Defining food literacy and its components. Appetite 2014;76:50-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.01.010
  14. Lee K, Ban H, Park K, Hwang Y. Development and measurement of the index of Agrifood Consumer Competency Index. J Rural Dev 2014;37:59-77.
  15. Vaitkeviciute R, Ball LE, Harris N. The relationship between food literacy and dietary intake in adolescents: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 2015;18:649-58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980014000962
  16. Palumbo R. Sustainability of well-being through literacy. The effects of food literacy on sustainability of well-being. Agric Agric Sci Proced 2016;8:99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.013
  17. Gil JM, Gracia A, Sanchez M. Market segmentation and willingness to pay for organic products in Spain. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev 2000;3:207-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7508(01)00040-4
  18. Thomas T, Gunden C. Investigating consumer attitudes toward food produced via three production systems: conventional, sustainable and organic. J Food Agric Environ 2012;10:132-5.
  19. Van Loo EJ, Diem MN, Pieniak Z, Verbeke W. Consumer attitudes, knowledge, and consumption of organic yogurt. J Dairy Sci 2013;96:2118-29. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6262
  20. Deliana Y. Market segmentation for organic products in Bandung West Java, Indonesia. Res J Recent Sci 2012;2277:2502.
  21. Seyfang G. Ecological citizenship and sustainable consumption: examining local organic food networks. J Rural Stud 2006;22:383-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.01.003
  22. Canavari M, Olson KD. Organic Food: Consumers' Choices and Farmers Opportunities. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag New York; 2007.
  23. Rahman SM, Mele MA, Lee YT, Islam MZ. Consumer preference, quality, and safety of organic and conventional fresh fruits, vegetables, and cereals. Foods 2021;10:105. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010105
  24. Bryla P. Organic food consumption in Poland: motives and barriers. Appetite 2016;105:737-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.012
  25. Li R, Lee HY, Lin YT, Liu CW, Tsai PF. Consumers' willingness to pay for organic foods in China: bibliometric review for an emerging literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:1713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101713
  26. Korea Rural Economic Institute. Raw data from the consumer behavior survey for foods 2019 [Internet]. Naju: Korea Rural Economic Institute; 2019 [cited 2021 January 12]. Available from: https://www.krei.re.kr/foodSurvey/selectBbsNttList.do?bbsNo=451&key=809.
  27. Korea Rural Economic Institute. A questionnaire for the consumer behavior survey for foods 2019 [Internet]. Naju: Korea Rural Economic Institute; 2019 [cited 2021 January 12]. Available from: https://www.krei.re.kr/foodSurvey/selectBbsNttList.do?bbsNo=453&key=811.
  28. Apaolaza V, Hartmann P, D'Souza C, Lopez CM. Eat organic-feel good? The relationship between organic food consumption, health concern and subjective wellbeing. Food Qual Prefer 2018;63:51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.07.011
  29. Michaelidou N, Hassan LM. The role of health consciousness, food safety concern and ethical identity on attitudes and intentions towards organic food. Int J Consum Stud 2008;32:163-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00619.x
  30. Makatouni A. What motivates consumers to buy organic food in the UK? Results from a qualitative study. Br Food J 2002;104:345-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700210425769
  31. Pino G, Peluso AM, Guido G. Determinants of regular and occasional consumers' intentions to buy organic food. J Consum Aff 2012;46:157-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2012.01223.x
  32. Smith S, Paladino A. Eating clean and green? Investigating consumer motivations towards the purchase of organic food. Australas Mark J 2010;18:93-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.01.001
  33. Soroka A, Wojciechowska-Solis J. Consumer motivation to buy organic food depends on lifestyle. Foods 2019;8:581. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8110581
  34. Krause C, Sommerhalder K, Beer-Borst S, Abel T. Just a subtle difference? Findings from a systematic review on definitions of nutrition literacy and food literacy. Health Promot Int 2018;33:378-89. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daw084
  35. Rosenbaum DL, Clark MH, Convertino AD, Call CC, Forman EM, Butryn ML. Examination of nutrition literacy and quality of self-monitoring in behavioral weight loss. Ann Behav Med 2018;52:809-16. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kax052
  36. Wickham CA, Carbone ET. What's technology cooking up? A systematic review of the use of technology in adolescent food literacy programs. Appetite 2018;125:333-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.001
  37. Begley A, Paynter E, Butcher L, Bobongie V, Dhaliwal SS. Identifying who improves or maintains their food literacy behaviours after completing an adult program. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:4462. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124462