DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

European Experience in Implementing Innovative Educational Technologies in the Field of Culture and the Arts: Current Problems and Vectors of Development

  • Kdyrova, I.O. (Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts, Faculty of Music, Department of Music) ;
  • Grynyshyna, M.O. (Department of Directing and Acting Skill Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts, Faculty of Theater, Cinema and Variety, Department of Directing and Acting Skill) ;
  • Yur, M.V. (Modern Art Research Institute of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Department of Curatorial and Exhibition Activity and Cultural Exchanges) ;
  • Osadcha, O.A. (Kyiv National University of Technology and Design, Faculty of Design, Department of Drawing and Painting) ;
  • Varyvonchyk, A. (Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts Faculty of design and advertising Department of Center Design)
  • Received : 2022.05.05
  • Published : 2022.05.30

Abstract

The main purpose of the work is to analyze modern innovative educational practices in the field of culture and art and their effectiveness in the context of the spread of digitalization trends. The study used general scientific theoretical methods of analysis, synthesis, analogy, comparative, induction, deduction, reductionism, and a number of others, allowing you to fully understand the pattern of modern modernization processes in a long historical development and demonstrate how the rejection of the negativity of progress allows talented artists to realize their own potential. The study established the advantages and disadvantages of involving innovative technologies in the educational process on the example of European experience and outlined possible ways of implementing digitalization processes in Ukrainian institutions of higher education, formulated the main difficulties encountered by teachers and students in the use of technological innovation in the pandemic. The rapid development of digital technologies has had a great impact on the sphere of culture and art, both visual, scenic, and musical in all processes: creation, reproduction, perception, learning, etc. In the field of art education, there is a synthesis of creative practices with digital technologies. In terms of music education, these processes at the present stage are provided with digital tools of specially developed software (music programs for composition and typing of musical text, recording, and correction of sound, for quality listening to the whole work or its fragments) for training programs used in institutional education and non-institutional learning as a means of independent mastering of the theory and practice of music-making, as well as other programs and technical tools without which contemporary art cannot be imagined. In modern stage education, the involvement of video technologies, means of remote communication, allowing realtime adjustment of the educational process, is actualized. In the sphere of fine arts, there is a transformation of communicative forms of interaction between the teacher and students, which in the conditions of the pandemic are of two-way communication with the help of information and communication technologies. At this stage, there is an intensification of transformation processes in the educational industry in the areas of culture and art.

Keywords

References

  1. Lebid, Yu.S.: Features of using digital tools for organizing distance learning for music students. In: Music in dialogue with modernity: lighting, mysticism, culturological studios: Materials of the Intern. sci.-pract. conf. / Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. Kiev National University of Culture and Science. Kiev, pp. 95-99 (2021).
  2. Sakhno, O. V.: Digital competence and technologies for learning: principles and tools. The image of a modern teacher, vol. 6 (195), pp. 10-14. https://doi.org/10.33272/2522-9729-2020-6(195)-10-14(2020).
  3. Voute, E., Stappers, P. J., Giaccardi, E., Mooij, S., & van Boeijen, A.: Innovating a large design education program at a university of technology. She Ji The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation, vol. 6(1), pp. 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.001 (2020).
  4. Meyer, M. W., & Norman, D.: Changing design education for the 21st century.She Ji The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation, vol. 6(1), pp. 13-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.002 (2020).
  5. Campos, P.: Resilience, education, and architecture: The proactive and "educational" dimensions of the spaces of formation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction: IJDRR, vol. 43(101391), pp. 101391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101391 (2020).
  6. Sanz-Hernandez, A., &Covaleda, I. Sustainability and creativity through mail art: A case study with young artists in universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 318(128525), pp. 128525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128525 (2021).
  7. Kamariotou, V., Kamariotou, M., &Kitsios, F.: Strategic planning for virtual exhibitions and visitors' experience: A multidisciplinary approach for museums in the digital age. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, vol. 21(e00183), pp. e00183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2021.e00183 (2021).
  8. Dorofeeva, V.Yu .: The method of gamification in the study of music-theoretical disciplines: theory and practice. In: Music in dialogue with the present: educational, art, cultural studies: materials International. scientific-practical conf. / Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts Kyiv, pp. 82-85. (2021).
  9. Broyako, H., Dorofeeva, V., Kovmir, H., Yurchuk, B .: Modern Internet resources as a means of independent work of students on the development of musical hearing. In: Scientific debates and prospective orientations of scientific development: a collection of scientific papers "LOGOE" with materials from the Scientific Conference and international practice (Vinnytsia Paris: European Scientific Platforms & La Fedelta, vol. 5, p. /10.36074/logos05.02.2021.v5.35 (2021).
  10. Shen, C.-W., & Ho, J.-T.: Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: A bibliometric analysis with latent semantic approach. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 104(106177), pp. 106177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106177(2020).
  11. Zoom, Blum, A., Larkin, T., &Bunevich, R.: High-Fidelity Music Mode & professional audio on Zoom. Zoom Blog. https://blog.zoom.us/high-fidelity- (2020, September 22).
  12. Xu, Z., Ge, Z., Wang, X., &Skare, M.: Bibliometric analysis of technology adoption literature published from 1997 to 2020.Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 170(120896), pp. 120896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120896 (2021).
  13. Pozo, J. I., Perez Echeverria, M.-P., Casas-Mas, A., Lopez-Iniguez, G., Cabellos, B., Mendez, E., Torrado, J. A., &Bano, L.: Teaching and learning musical instruments through ICT: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Heliyon, vol. 8(1), pp. e08761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08761 (2022).
  14. Nortvig, A.-M., Petersen, A. K., Helsinghof, H., &Braender, B.: Digital expansions of physical learning spaces in practice-based subjects - blended learning in Art and Craft & Design in teacher education. Computers & Education, vol. 159(104020), pp. 104020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104020 (2020).
  15. Bakirova, S. A., Izim, T. O., Nikolayeva, L. A., &Saitova, G. Y.: Choreographic art features: Creative concepts and innovations in teaching. Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 41(100901), pp. 100901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100901 (2021).
  16. Pauget, B., Tobelem, J.-M., & Bootz, J.-P.: The future of French museums in 2030. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 162(120384), pp. 120384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120384 (2021).
  17. Chipeva, P., Cruz-Jesus, F., Oliveira, T., & Irani, Z.: Digital divide at individual level: Evidence for Eastern and Western European countries. Government Information Quarterly, vol. 35(3), pp. 460-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.06.003 (2018).
  18. Moula, Z.: Academic perceptions of barriers and facilitators of creative pedagogies in higher education: A cross-cultural study between the UK and China. Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 41(100923), pp. 100923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100923 (2021).
  19. Keller, A., Weber, S. M., &Arlinghaus, J. C.: Propositions on the benefits of the organizational education perspective towards realizing industry 4.0-promises.Procedia CIRP, vol. 104, pp. 1734-1740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.292 (2021).
  20. Ramisio, P. J., Pinto, L. M. C., Gouveia, N., Costa, H., &Arezes, D.: Sustainability Strategy in Higher Education Institutions: Lessons learned from a nine-year case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 222, pp. 300-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.257 (2019).
  21. Compagnucci, L., &Spigarelli, F.: The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 161(120284), pp. 120284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284 (2020).
  22. Bonet, L., &Negrier, E.: The participative turn in cultural policy: Paradigms, models, contexts. Poetics (Hague,Netherlands), vol. 66, pp. 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2018.02.006 (2018).
  23. Katz-Buonincontro, J., Perignat, E., & Hass, R. W.: Conflicted epistemic beliefs about teaching for creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 36(100651), pp. 100651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100651 (2020).
  24. Vicente-Saez, R., Gustafsson, R., & Van den Brande, L.: The dawn of an open exploration era: Emergent principles and practices of open science and innovation of university research teams in a digital world. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 156(120037), pp. 120037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120037 (2020).
  25. Montuori, A., & Donnelly, G.: Creativity and the Future. In S. Pritzker & M. Runco (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, pp. 250-257. Elsevier. (2020).
  26. Bonnin Roca, J., Vaishnav, P., Morgan, G. M., Fuchs, E., & Mendonca, J.: Technology Forgiveness: Why emerging technologies differ in their resilience to institutional instability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 166(120599), pp. 120599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120599 (2021).
  27. Tang, M.: Interdisciplinarity Creativity. In S. Pritzker & M. Runco (Eds.), Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology, pp. 678-684. Elsevier. (2020).
  28. Boychenko, M .: Digital learning environment: innovative ecosystem of distance learning in higher education institutions. In: Education for the 21st Century: Challenges, Challenges and Prospects. Materials II International scientific-practical conf. , pp. 129-132.Summy. (2020).