DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Peculiarities of Pedagogical Technologies in Distance Education

  • Biliavska, Tetiana (Department of Primary Education, Mykolayiv National University of V. O. Sukhomlynsky) ;
  • Lianna, Olha (Department of Health, Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation and Occupational Therapy, Sumy State Pedagogical University) ;
  • Shuliakov, Igor (Department of Foreign Language, Academic and Research Institute of Economics and Management, O.M. Beketov Kharkiv National University of Urban Economy) ;
  • Babicheva, Hanna (Department of Foreign Languages Education and Research, Ivan Chernyakhovskyi National Defense University of Ukraine) ;
  • Vashchuk, Liudmyla (Department of Fitness and Cyclic Sports, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University) ;
  • Savchenko, Nataliia (Department of Pedagogy and Educational Management, Uman State Pedagogical University Named After Pavel Tychyna)
  • Received : 2022.05.05
  • Published : 2022.05.30

Abstract

The article provides a theoretical substantiation of the pedagogical interaction of the subjects of the educational process in the context of distance learning; taking into account the identified features of the implementation of pedagogical interaction defined teaching methods in distance learning; a course has been developed that reveals the features of the pedagogical interaction of participants in the educational process in conditions of distance learning. To solve the tasks and check starting points, a set of methods was used: theoretical: analysis of philosophical, psychological and pedagogical literature, dissertation research, curricula, analysis of the conceptual and terminological system; empirical: questioning, conversation, self-diagnosis.

Keywords

References

  1. Azim Danesh, April Bailey, Thomas Whisenand. Technology and Instructor-Interface Interaction in Distance. Education International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 6, No. 2; February 2015. P. 39-47.
  2. Carver D.L., Kosloski M.F. Analysis of student perceptions of the psychosocial learning environment in online and face-to-face career and technical education courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 2015. Vol. 16 (4). P. 7-22.
  3. Gemmell I., Harrison R., Clegg Ju., Reed K. Internationalisation in online distance learning postgraduate education: a case study on student views on learning alongside students from other countries. Innovations in Education & Teaching International. 2015. Vol. 52 (2). P. 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.881264
  4. Marco Casarotti, Luca Filipponi, Luca Pieti and Riccardo Sartori. Educational interaction in distance learning: Analysis of a one-way video and twoway audio system. PsychNology Journal. Volume 1. Number 1. 2016. P. 28-38.
  5. Moore M., & Kearsley G. Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth, 2005. 290 p.
  6. Thurmond V. A., Wambach K., Connors H. R. et al. Evaluation of student satisfaction : Determining the impact of a Web-based environment by controlling for student characteristics. The American Journal of Distance Education. 2002, No 16. P. 169-189.
  7. Calderhead, J., Gates P. Conceptualizing reflection in teacher development. London: Falmer Press, 1993. pp.1-9.
  8. Buscaglia, Leo F.,Living, Loving & Learning, edited by Steven Short. NewYork, Fawcett Columbine 1982, pp.268.
  9. Tetiana Kronivets, Yelyzaveta Tymoshenko, Oksana Diachenko, Tetiana Shabelnyk, Nadiia Ivanchenko, Svitlana Iasechko Artificial intelligence as a key element of digital education / IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, VOL.21 No.106 pp. 67-72 https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.10.9