DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

과학 학습 동기가 높은 학생이 과학 학업 성취도가 높아지는가, 또는 그 역인가? -양자가 지닌 교차지연 효과 및 이공계 진로 동기에 미치는 효과-

Does Science Motivation Lead to Higher Achievement, or Vice Versa?: Their Cross-Lagged Effects and Effects on STEM Career Motivation

  • 투고 : 2022.05.09
  • 심사 : 2022.06.27
  • 발행 : 2022.06.30

초록

본 연구에서는 고등학교 맥락에서 과학 학습 동기가 높은 학생이 과학 학업 성취도가 오르게 되는지 또는 역으로 과학 학업 성취도가 높은 학생이 과학 학습 동기가 오르게 되는지의 인과 관계를 살펴보고, 이러한 두 요인들이 학생의 이공계 진로 동기에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 2021년 2학기에 서울시 소재 1개 일반계고등학교 1학년 학생을 대상으로 동일 시간 간격으로 3회의 과학 학습 동기 검사를 실시하였고, 마지막 검사 시기에 이공계 진로 동기 검사 역시 실시하였다. 총 171명의 학생 중간고사 및 기말고사 성적을 포함한 자기회귀 교차지연(autoregressive cross-lagged) 모형을 구성하고 적합하였다. 연구 모형은 높은 측정안정성과 적합도를 지닌 것으로 나타났다. 자기회귀 경로와 교차지연 경로는 모두 통계적으로 유의미하였다. 다만 표준화 회귀 계수의 크기는 과학 학습 동기에서 학업 성취도로 향하는 경로가 그 역의 경로보다 큰 편이었다. 이공계 진로 동기로 향하는 경로 중 기말고사 성적은 유의미한 직접 효과를 나타내지 않았으며, 3차 과학 학습 동기 점수만이 유의미한 직접 효과를 나타내었다. 간접효과의 경우 학기 초의 1차 과학 학습 동기가 기말고사 성적 및 이공계 진로 동기에 이르기까지 유의미한 영향을 미쳤으며, 기말고사 성적은 3차 과학 학습 동기 점수를 매개로 이공계 진로 동기에 유의미한 영향을 미쳤다. 그러나 기말고사 성적은 이공계 진로 동기에 유의미한 총 효과를 지니지 않았다. 본 연구의 결과는 과학 학습 동기와 과학 학업 성취도 간의 상호적이면서도 순환적인 인과관계와 함께, 그 가운데 과학 학습 동기가 높은 학생이 과학 성취도가 오르게 되는 효과가 그 역보다 크다는 점을 보여준다. 연구 결과로써 고등학교에서 과학 학습 동기의 중요성을 재확인하였다. 고등학교에서 학기 초, 중, 후반에 과학 학습 동기를 증진시키기 위한 교수적 함의를 논의하였으며, 후속 연구로서 고등학생의 과학 학습 동기와 학업 성취도가 향후 이공계 직업 생활에 미치는 영향에 대한 종단 연구를 제안하였다.

This study causally investigates whether high school student with high science learning motivation becomes to achieve more or vice versa, and also how those two factors affect STEM career motivation. Research participants were 1st year students in a high school at Seoul. We surveyed their science learning motivation three times in the same time interval in the fall semester of 2021, and once a STEM career motivation in the third period. We collected data from 171 students with their mid-term and final exam scores, with which, we constructed and fitted an autoregressive cross-lagged model. The research model shows high measurement stability and fit indices. All the autoregressive and cross-lagged paths were statistically significant. However, standardized regression coefficients were larger in path from motivation to achievement compared to the opposite. Only science learning motivation shows significant direct effect on STEM career motivation, rather than achievement. For indirect effects, the first science learning motivation affected the final exam score and STEM career motivation, and the final exam score affected STEM career motivation. However, the final exam score did not have a total effect toward STEM career motivation. The result of this study shows reciprocal and cyclic causality between science learning motivation and achievement - in comparison, the effect of motivation for the opposite is larger than that of achievement. Also the result of this study strongly reaffirms the importance of science learning motivation. Instructional implications for strengthening science learning motivation throughout a semester was discussed, and a study for the longitudinal effect of science learning motivation and achievement in high school student toward future STEM vocational life was suggested.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구의 자료 수집에 도움을 주신 서울대학교사범대학부설고등학교 이화성 교장 선생님과 정은주 교무부장 선생님께 감사드립니다.

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, S., & Park, Y. (2018). Follow-up study on career selection process for science high school graduates. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 28(1), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2018.28.1.91
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman
  4. Bang, D. (2016). The analysis of the structural relationships among outside of school scientific experience, learning environment, science learning motivation, metacognitive strategy and academic achievement in science. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(4), 719-740.
  5. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
  6. Chik, Z., & Abdullah, A. H. (2018). Effect of motivation, learning style and discipline learn about academic achievement additional mathematics. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(4), 772-787.
  7. Cho, D. & Kim, H. (2020). The influence of visual design class using gamification on the learning motivation and academic achievement of first-year high school learners. Archives of Design Research, 33(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2020.05.33.2.215
  8. Choi, J. Y., & Kim, K. H. (2018). The Effects of Motivation Improvement Program for Underachieved Students. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(12), 87-95. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.12.087
  9. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1991). A motivation approach to self: Integration in personality. In Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 237-288), Lincoln.
  10. Deci, E., Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L., & Ryan, R. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
  11. Gibbons R. E., & Raker, J. R. (2019). Self-beliefs in organic chemistry: Evaluation of a reciprocal causation, cross-lagged model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56, 598-618. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21515
  12. Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159-1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442
  13. Ha, M., & Lee, J. -K. (2013). The item response, generalizability, and structural validity for the translation of Science Motivation Questionnaire II(SMQII). Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 13(5), 1-18.
  14. Hoft, L., & Bernholt, S. (2019). Longitudinal couplings between interest and conceptual understanding in secondary school chemistry: an activity-based perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 41(5), 607-627. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1571650
  15. Holmes, J. A. (2011). Informal learning: Student achievement and motivation in science through museum-based learning. Learning Environments Research, 14(3), 263-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-011-9094-y
  16. Hong, S. (2000). The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structural equation modeling and their rationales. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 161-177.
  17. Hong, S. H., Min, S. P., & Kim, W. J. (2007). Testing the autoregressive cross-lagged effects between adolescents' internet addiction and communication with parents: Multigroup analysis across gender. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 21(1), 129-143.
  18. Hong, S. M. (2015). An analysis of the deviation from S&T workforce career-path in Korea. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 18(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2015.18.1.11
  19. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
  20. Jeon, K., Park, H., & Noh, T. (2005). Influence of students' perceptions of motivational climate emphasized by science teachers and peers on achievement goals. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 25(3), 364-370.
  21. Jin, M., & Yoon, H. (2002). The avoidance of science and engineering fields of high school students in attending colleges and universities in Korea. Seoul, Korea: Korean Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training.
  22. Kang, M., Kim, Y., Lim, H., & Yoo, Y. R. (2014). Investigating the structural relationship among science experience, learning motivation, achievement and career orientation of high school students. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 18(3), 625-643. https://doi.org/10.24231/RICI.2014.18.3.625
  23. Kim, C., Lee, H., Kwon, J., Kim, Y., & Kim, C. (1991). Assessment of Science Learning. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  24. Kim, J. R. (2014). The structural relationship among intrinsic motivation, learning strategies, academic engagement, and academic achievement: Focusing on gender differences of high school students. Asian Journal of Education, 15(1), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2014.15.1.005
  25. Kim, S., & Hong, S. (2018). The effects of school contexts and student characteristics on cognitive and affective achievement in South Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19, 557-572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9557-2
  26. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications.
  27. Komatsu, H., & Rappleye, J. (2017). A PISA paradox? An alternative theory of learning as a possible solution for variations in PISA scores. Comparative Education Review, 61(2), 269-297. https://doi.org/10.1086/690809
  28. Korea Ministry of Education [KMOE] (1981). General Guideline of the 4th National Curriculum.
  29. Korea Ministry of Education [KMOE] (2015). Science Curriculum.Korea
  30. Ministry of Education [KMOE] (2021). Plans for proceeding future curriculum with peoples.
  31. Lee, G. -G., Jeon, Y. -E., & Hong, H. -G. (2021). The effects of cooperative flipped learning on science achievement and motivation in high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1381-1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1917788
  32. Lee, H., & Lim, H. (2020). Elementary students' and teachers' perception on science-related career and career education. Journal of Science Education, 44(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2020.44.1.50
  33. Lee, H., & Noh, S. (2013). Advanced Statistical Analysis (2nd ed.). Goyang: Moonwoo.
  34. Lee, J., & Chung, Y. (2014). An analysis of structural relationship among the attitude toward science, science motivation, self-regulated learning strategy, and science achieement in middle school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(5), 491-497. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2014.34.5.0491
  35. Lee, S. M. & Kim, H. -J. (2020). The Effect of Virtual Reality-assisted Art Appreciation Class on Learner's Motivation and Academic Achievement. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 24(2), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.24231/RICI.2020.24.2.167
  36. Lee, S. -H. & Lee, H. C. (2019). The Effects of Writing Science Diary on Science Learning Motivation, Science Academic Achievement and Ecological Sensitivity of Elementary Students- Focused on the Unit of the Structure and Function of Plants -. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 38(3), 387-394. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2019.38.3.387
  37. Liu, Y., Ferrell, B., Barbera, J., & Lewis, J. E. (2017). Development and evaluation of a chemistry-specific version of the academic motivation scale (AMS-Chemistry). Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(1), 191-213. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00200E
  38. Moon, Y. -l. (2001). Developing emotional intelligence programs for elementary and secondary education. Journal of the College of Education, 62, 27-53.
  39. National Science Teachers Association [NSTA] (1971). NSTA position statement on school science education for the 70's. The Science Teacher, 38, 46-51.
  40. Nichols, J. D. (1996). The effects of cooperative learning on student achievement and motivation in a high school geometry class. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 467-476. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0031
  41. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030 - A Series of Concept Notes. Paris: OECD.
  42. Oliver, J. S., & Simpson, R. D. (1988). Influences of attitude toward science, achievement motivation, and science self concept on achievement in science: A longitudinal study. Science Education, 72(2), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730720204
  43. Park, M., Kim, Y., & Jeon, D. (2007). The effect of factors in assessment on the science learning motivation of students of high achieving students.
  44. Park, S., & Kim, S. (2016). Reciprocal effects of social relationships and sense of community in adolescents. Studies on Korean Youth, 27(2), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.14816/sky.2016.27.2.5
  45. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Prentice Hall.
  46. Schafer, R. (1968). Aspects of Internalization. International Universities Press, Inc.
  47. Schlueter, E., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2017). Applying autoregressive cross-lagged and latent growth curve models to a three-wave panel study. In van Montfort, K., Oud, J., & Satorra, A. (eds.). Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences (pp. 315-336). Routledge.
  48. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
  49. Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1989). Self-modeling and children's cognitive skill learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.81.2.155
  50. Shin, D., & Lee, M. (2021). Interaction between inquiry-based teaching and teacher guidance on Korean students' science achievement and motivation in PISA 2015. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 35(4), 707-730. https://doi.org/10.17286/KJEP.2021.35.4.08
  51. Shin, H. -j., & Je, H. -s. (2019). Exploring the happiness of children around 'doing well activities' and 'favorite activities'. The Journal of Eco Early Childhood Education & Care, 18(1), 231-252. https://doi.org/10.30761/ECOECE.2019.18.1.231
  52. Shin, S., Ha, M., & Lee, J. -K. (2016). The development and validation of instrument for measuring high school students' STEM career motivation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.1.0075
  53. Shin, S., Rachmatullah, A., Ha, M., & Lee, J. -K. (2018). A longitudinal trajectory of science learning motivation in Korean high school students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(4), 674-687. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.674
  54. Shin, Y., & Sohn. W. (2015). Longitudinal interplay between academic motivation and achievement: A self-determination theory perspective. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 29(3), 591-610. https://doi.org/10.17286/KJEP.2015.29.3.09
  55. Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596607
  56. Vu, T., Magis-Weinberg, L., Jansen, B. R., van Atteveldt, N., Janssen, T. W., Lee, N. C., … & Meeter, M. (2021). Motivation-achievement cycles in learning: A literature review and research agenda. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09616-7
  57. Williams, D. R., Brule, H., Kelley, S. S., & Skinner, E. A. (2018). Science in the Learning Gardens (SciLG): A study of students' motivation, achievement, and science identity in low-income middle schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0097-9
  58. Woo, J. (2012). The Concept and Understanding of Structural Equation Model. Seoul: Hannarae.
  59. Wyk, M. M. V. (2011). The effects of Teams-Games-Tournaments on achievement, retention, and attitudes of economics education students. Journal of Social Sciences, 26(3), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2011.11892895
  60. Yoon, J., Park, S., & Myeong, J. -O. (2006). A survey of primary and secondary school students' views in relation to a career in science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(6), 675-690.
  61. Yoo, W., Mayberry, R., Bae, S., Singh, K., He, Q., & Lillard, J. W. (2014). A study of effects of multicollinearity in the multivariable analysis. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 4(5), 9-19.
  62. You, H. S., Kim, K., Black, K., & Min, K. W. (2018). Assessing science motivation for college students: Validation of the science motivation questionnaire II using the rasch-andrich rating scale model. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1161-1173.