수산경영론집 (The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration)

  • 제53권4호
  • /
  • Pages.51-67
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1225-1011(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-1727(eISSN)
한국수산경영학회 (The Korean Society of Fisheries Business Administration)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수산물 품목분류 분쟁사례에 관한 연구-도시디쿠스(Dosidicus)속 기가스(Gigas)종 오징어 품목분류 사례를 중심으로

Study on the Fishery Products Classification Dispute Cases - Focusing on the Classification of Dosidicus Gigas Squid Species

  • 박민규 (인하대학교 국제통상학과)
  • Min-Gyu Park (Department of International Trade, Inha University)
  • 투고 : 2022.11.10
  • 심사 : 2022.12.25
  • 발행 : 2022.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The Korean tariff rate for fishery products is a single tax rate of 10% for live fish and frozen seafood, and 20% for all others. Since FTAs have been concluded with several countries, the tariffs is not an appropriate means to protect domestic fishery producers. The differential tariff rate according to the scientific name (genus) of the fishery products, which was implemented 30 years ago to protect fishery products produced in the Korean coastal waters has lost its original purpose. It seems that future fishery trade policy should focus on IUU prevention, hygiene and safety of consumers rather than protecting fishery producers through customs tariffs. This paper suggest that a paradigm shift in the fishery producers protection policies such as direct financial support from the state, protection and development of fishery resources, and support for fostering the 6th industry rather than indirect protection through tariffs.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2022년도 인하대학교 학술연구비 지원에 의하여 연구되었음

참고문헌

  1. 김기수.김우경(2006), "환율과 환율변동성의 변화가 수산물 수입에 미치는 영향분석", 수산경영론집, 37(2), 1-18.
  2. 김은지.김봉태(2019), "우리나라 김과 참치의 수출 결정요인 분석 :중력모형을 이용하여", 수산경영론집, 51(4). 85-96.
  3. 강종호.김우수(2019), "해조류 부산물의 유효이용을 위한 산업화방향 연구", 수산경영론집, 50(4), 1-9.
  4. 심재희(2015), "우리나라 해조류산업의 무역구조 분석과 시사점", 통상정보연구, 17(4), 325-346.
  5. 양평섭(2007), "산업패널을 이용한 한국의 대중국 수출결정요인 분석", 동북아경제연구, 19(1), 93-130.
  6. 최정윤.김정봉(2003), "한.일 수산물 수출입 경쟁구조", 수산경영론집, 34(2), 141-164.
  7. 관세청 수출입무역통계(https://unipass.customs.go.kr/ets/)(2022년 10월 15일 접속).
  8. 국립수산과학원 수산생명정보센터 생물종정보(https://www.nifs.go.kr/frcenter/species/?_p=species_view&mf_tax_id=MF0001820)(2022년 10월 20일 접속).
  9. FAO (2010), Cephalopods of the World, An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of Cephalopod Species Known to Date, p. 272.
  10. Rodhouse, P. G. (2005), World squid resources. In: Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization, 175-187. (FAO fisheries technical paper, 457).
  11. WCO (2017) HSC NC2326E1a 59th Session, Matters For Decision By The Harmonized System Committee, Brussels, 22 February 2017, para. 40.
  12. WCO (2018) HSC NC2562E1a 62nd Session, Possible Amendment to New Heading 03.09 (Hs 2022)(Proposal by The Secretariat) (Item IX.7 on Agenda) Brussels.
  13. WCO (2022), Historical documents of the Harmonized System Committee (http://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/nomenclature/resources/hs_historial-documents.aspx).