Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제22권6호
  • /
  • Pages.585-595
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A new non-iterative procedure to estimate seismic demands of structures

  • 투고 : 2021.08.04
  • 심사 : 2022.06.11
  • 발행 : 2022.06.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Using the nonlinear static procedures has become very common in seismic codes to achieve the nonlinear response of the structure during an earthquake. The capacity spectrum method (CSM) adopted in ATC-40 is considered as one of the most known and useful procedures. For this procedure the seismic demand can be approximated from the maximum deformation of an equivalent linear elastic Single-Degree-of-Freedom system (SDOF) that has an equivalent damping ratio and period by using an iterative procedure. Data from the results of this procedure are plotted in acceleration- displacement response spectrum (ADRS) format. Different improvements have been made in order to have more accurate results compared to the Non Linear Time History Analysis (NL-THA). A new procedure is presented in this paper where the iteration process shall not be required. This will be done by estimation the ductility demand response spectrum (DDRS) and the corresponding effective damping of the bilinear system based on a new parameter of control, called normalized yield strength coefficient (η), while retaining the attraction of graphical implementation of the improved procedure of the FEMA-440. The proposed procedure accuracy should be verified with the NL-THA analysis results as a first implementation. The comparison shows that the new procedure provided a good estimation of the nonlinear response of the structure compared with those obtained when using the NL-THA analysis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Akkar, S. and Metin, A. (2007), "Assessment of improved nonlinear static procedures in fema-440", J. Struct. Eng., 133(9), 1237-1246. http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:9(1237).
  2. Albanesi, T., Nuti, C. and Vanzi, I. (2000), "A simplified procedure to assess the seismic response of nonlinear structures", Earthq. Spectra, 16(4), 715-734. http://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586136.
  3. ASCE/SEI (2017), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, U.S.A.
  4. ATC, A. (1996), "Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings", report ATC-40; Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, U.S.A.
  5. Baber, T.T. and Noori, M.N. (1985), "Random vibration of degrading, pinching systems", J. Eng. Mech., 111(8), 1010-1026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:8(1010).
  6. Bantilas, K.E., Kavvadias, I.E. and Vasiliadis, L.K. (2017), "Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic spectra for high viscous damped buildings", Earthq. Struct., 13(4), 337-351. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.4.337.
  7. Benazouz, C., Moussa, L. and Ali, Z. (2012), "Ductility and inelastic deformation demands of structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 42(5), 631-644. http://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.42.5.631.
  8. Bergami, A.V., Forte, A., Lavorato, D. and Nuti, C. (2017), "Proposal of a incremental modal pushover analysis (IMPA)", Earthq. Struct., 13(6), 539-549. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.6.539.
  9. Bertero, V.V. (1995), "Tri-service manual methods, in VISION 2000", Part 2, Appendix J, Structural Engineers Association of California , Sacramento , California, U.S.A.
  10. Bhatt, C. and Bento, R. (2014), "The extended adaptive capacity spectrum method for the seismic assessment of plan-asymmetric buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 30(2), 683-703. https://doi.org/10.1193/022112EQS048M.
  11. Bouc, R. (1967), "Forced vibration of mechanical systems with hysteresis", Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Non-linear Oscillation, Prague, Czechoslovakia.
  12. Casarotti, C. and Pinho, R. (2007), "An adaptive capacity spectrum method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action", B. Earthq. Eng., 5(3), 377-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9031-8.
  13. Chikh, B., Laouami, N., Mebarki, A., Leblouba, M., Mehani, Y., Kibboua, A. and Benouar, D. (2017), "Seismic structural demands and inelastic deformation ratios: Sensitivity analysis and simplified models", Earthq. Struct., 13(1), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.1.059.
  14. Chikh, B., Mebarki, A., Laouami, N., Leblouba, M., Mehani, Y., Hadid, M., ... and Benouar, D. (2017), "Seismic structural demands and inelastic deformation ratios: A theoretical approach", Earthq. Struct. Int. J., 12(4), 397-407. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.4.397.
  15. Chikh, B., Mehani, Y. and Leblouba, M. (2016), "Simplified procedure for seismic demands assessment of structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 59(3), 455-473. http://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.59.3.455.
  16. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (1999a), "Capacity-demand-diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum", Earthq. Spectra, 15(4), 637-656. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586065.
  17. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (1999b), "Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems" Report No. PEER1999/02; University of California, Berkeley, U.S.A.
  18. Chopra, A.K. and Chintanapakdee, C. (2004), "Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: single-degree-of-freedom bilinear systems", J. Struct. Eng., 130(9), 1309-1319. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1309).
  19. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2004), "A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 33(8), 903-927. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.380.
  20. Code, P. (2005), Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, European Committee for Standardization; Brussels, Belgium.
  21. Elnashai, A.S. (2001), "Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications", Struct. Eng. Mech., 12(1), 51-70. http://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2001.12.1.051.
  22. Fajfar, P. and Gaspersic, P. (1996), "The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199601)25:1<31::AID-EQE534>3.0.CO;2-V.
  23. Fajfar, P. (1999), "Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28(9), 979-993. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<979::AID-EQE850>3.0.CO;2-1.
  24. FEMA (1997), NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Rep. No. FEMA-273 (Guidelines) and Rep. No. FEMA-274 (Commentary), Washington, D.C, U.S.A.
  25. FEMA (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Rep. No. FEMA-356, Washington, D.C, U.S.A.
  26. FEMA (2005), Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, FEMA-440, Washington, D.C, U.S.A.
  27. Freeman, S.A. (1978), "Prediction of response of concrete buildings to severe earthquake motion", Special Publication, 55, 589-606.
  28. Freeman, S.A. Nicoletti, J.P. and Tyrell, J.V. (1975), "Evaluation of existing buildings for seismic risk-a case study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington", Proceedings of 1st U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Michigan, June.
  29. Gulkan, P. and Sozen, M. (1974), "Inelastic response of reinforced concrete structures to earthquake motions", ACI J., 71(12), 604-610.
  30. Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S.K. (1998), "Effect of hysteretic model parameters on inelastic seismic demands", Proceedings of the 6th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, Washington, May.
  31. Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S.K. (2000). "Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures", Earthq. Spectra, 16(2), 367-391. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586117.
  32. Guyader, A. (2004). "A statistical approach to equivalent linearization with applications to performance-based engineering", Ph.D. Dissertation, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California, U.S.A.
  33. Guyader, A. and Iwan, W.D. (2004), "User Guide for AutoCSM: Automated Capacity Spectrum Method of Analysis", Report No. EERL 2004-05; California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California, U.S.A.
  34. Guyader, A. and Iwan, W.D. (2006), "Determining equivalent linear parameters for use in a capacity spectrum method of analysis", J. Struct. Eng., 132(1), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:1(59).
  35. Han, S.W., Ha, S.J., Moon, K.H. and Shin, M. (2014), "Improved capacity spectrum method with inelastic displacement ratio considering higher mode effects", Earthq. Struct., 7(4), 587-607. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.4.587.
  36. Italian Building Code (2008), Technical recommendations for buildings, Dubai Municipality; Rome, Italy.
  37. Iwan, W.D. and Gates, N.C. (1979), "The effective period and damping of a class of hysteretic structures." Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 7(3), 199-211. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290070302.
  38. Iwan, W.D. (1980), "Estimating inelastic response spectra from elastic spectra", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 8(4), 375-388. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290080407.
  39. Iwan, W.D. and Guyader, A.C. (2001), "A study of the accuracy of the capacity spectrum method in engineering analysis", In Proc., 3rd US-Japan Workshop on Performace-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, California, U.S.A, August.
  40. Iwan, W.D. and Guyader, A.C. (2002). "An improved equivalent linearization procedure for the capacity spectrum method", Pasadena, California, U.S.A.
  41. Jafari, M. and Soltani, M. (2018), "A stochastic adaptive pushover procedure for seismic assessment of buildings", Earthq. Struct., 14(5), 477-492. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.5.477.
  42. Kowalsky, M.J. (1994), "Displacement-based design-a methodology for seismic design applied to RC bridge columns", Master Thesis, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  43. Krawinkler, H. (1995), "New trends in seismic design methodology", European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, Austria, January.
  44. Lenza, P., Ghersi, A., Marino, E.M. and Pellecchia, M. (2017), "A multimodal adaptive evolution of the N1 method for assessment and design of RC framed structures", Earthq. Struct., 12(3), 271-284. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.3.271.
  45. Lin, Y.Y. and Chang, K.C. (2003), "A non-iterative direct displacement-based design procedure for SDOF steel columns: using substitute structure", J. Mech., 19(3), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1727719100003208 .
  46. Lin, Y.Y. and Miranda, E. (2004), "Non-iterative capacity spectrum method based on equivalent linearization for estimating inelastic deformation demands of buildings", Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu, 2004(773), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej.2004.773_1.
  47. Liu, G., Lian, J., Liang, C. and Zhao, M. (2016), "Structural response analysis in time and frequency domain considering both ductility and strain rate effects under uniform and multiple-support earthquake excitations", Earthq. Struct., 10(5), 989-1012. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.5.989.
  48. Mahin, S.A. and Lin, J. (1983), "Construction of inelastic response spectra for single-degree-of-freedom systems", Report No. UCB/EERC-83/17; Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California, Berkeley, U.S.A.
  49. Mechaala, A., Benazouz, C., Zedira, H., Mehani, Y. and Guezouli, S. (2019), "Higher modes contribution for estimating the inelastic deformation ratios and seismic demands of structures", J. Mech. Sci. Tech., 33(2), 591-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0113-8.
  50. Miranda, E. (1993), "Evaluation of site-dependent inelastic seismic design spectra", J. Struct. Eng., 119(5), 1319-1338. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:5(1319).
  51. Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W. J. (1982), "Earthquake Spectra and Design", Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, U.S.A.
  52. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. (2003), "Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of existing structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 32(8), 1237-1258. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.271.
  53. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. (2006), "Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of structures built on soft soil sites", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 35(6), 679-694. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.552.
  54. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Gonzalez, E.J. (2014), "Implementation of displacement coefficient method for seismic assessment of buildings built on soft soil sites", Engineering structures, 59, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.017.
  55. Sanchez-Flores, F. and Igarashi, A. (2011), "Equivalent period and damping of SDOF systems for spectral response of the Japanese highway bridges code", Earthq. Struct., 2(4), 377-396. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2011.2.4.377.
  56. Shibata, A. and Sozen, M.A. (1976). "Substitute-structure method for seismic design in R/C", J. Struct. D., 102(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0004250.
  57. Wen, Yi-Kwei (1976), "Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems", J. Eng. Mech. D., 102 (2), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0002106.
  58. Yaghmaei-Sabegh, S., Neekmanesh, S. and Lumantarna, E. (2014), "Nonlinear response estimates of RC frames using linear analysis of SDOF systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 43(5), 769-790. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2371.
  59. Yazdani, A. and Salimi, M.R. (2015), "Earthquake response spectra estimation of bilinear hysteretic systems using random-vibration theory method", Earthq. Struct., 8(5), 1055-1067. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.5.1055.
  60. Yaghmaei-Sabegh, S., Neekmanesh, S. and Ruiz-Garcia, J. (2017), "Evaluation of approximate methods for estimating maximum displacement response of MDOF systems", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 101, 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.07.020.
  61. Yaghmaei-Sabegh, S., Zafarvand, S. and Makaremi, S. (2018), "Evaluation of N2 method for damage estimation of MDOF systems", Earthq. Struct., 14(2), 155-165. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.2.155.
  62. Yaghmaei-Sabegh, S., Neekmanesh, S. and Ruiz-Garcia, J. (2019), "Evaluation of the coefficient method for estimation of maximum roof displacement demand of existing buildings subjected to near-fault ground motions", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 121, 276-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.03.015