DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation, Characterization and Molecular Analysis of Cellulolytic Bacteria from Soil in Peshawar, Pakistan

  • Ikram, Hira (Institute of Biological Sciences, Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology) ;
  • Khan, Hamid Ali (Director Office of Reseaerch, Innovation and Commercialization, Sarhad University of Sciecnce and IT) ;
  • Ali, Hina (Institute of Biological Sciences, Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology) ;
  • Liu, Yanhui (Center for Genomics and Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University) ;
  • Kiran, Jawairia (Institute of Biological Sciences, Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology) ;
  • Ullah, Amin (Department of Health and Biological Sciences, Abasyn University Peshawar) ;
  • Ahmad, Yaseen (Institute of Biological Sciences, Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology) ;
  • Sardar, Sadia (Institute of Biological Sciences, Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology) ;
  • Gul, Alia (Department of Botany Hazara University)
  • Received : 2022.01.17
  • Accepted : 2022.05.19
  • Published : 2022.06.28

Abstract

Cellulases are a group of biocatalyst enzymes that are capable of degrading cellulosic biomass present in the natural environment and produced by a large number of microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi, etc. In the current study, we isolated, screened and characterized cellulase-producing bacteria from soil. Three cellulose-degrading species were isolated based on clear zone using Congo red stain on carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) agar plates. These bacterial isolates, named as HB2, HS5 and HS9, were subsequently characterized by morphological and biochemical tests as well as 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Based on 16S rRNA analysis, the bacterial isolates were identified as Bacillus cerus, Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus stratosphericus. Moreover, for maximum cellulase production, different growth parameters were optimized. Maximum optical density for growth was also noted at pH 7.0 for 48 h for all three isolates. Optical density was high for all three isolates using meat extract as a nitrogen source for 48 h. The pH profile of all three strains was quite similar but the maximum enzyme activity was observed at pH 7.0. Maximum cellulase production by all three bacterial isolates was noted when using lactose as a carbon rather than nitrogen and peptone. Further studies are needed for identification of new isolates in this region having maximum cellulolytic activity. Our findings indicate that this enzyme has various potential industrial applications.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We are thankful to Dr. Hina Ali for her assistance in Bioinformatics and the organization of manuscript and Mr. Shafiq for his helping in experimental lab work and all the authors for contribution in this manuscript. This study was partially supported by Sarhad University of Science and IT, Peshawar, Pakistan.

References

  1. Rasul F, Afroz A, Rashid U, Mehmood S, Sughra K, Zeeshan N. 2015. Screening and characterization of cellulase producing bacteria from soil and waste (molasses) of sugar industry. Int. J. Biosci. 6: 230-236. https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/6.2.230-236
  2. Zhang YP. 2008. Reviving the carbohydrate economy via multiproduct lignocellulose biorefineries. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35: 367-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-007-0293-6
  3. Shaikh NM, Patel A, Mehta S, Patel N. 2013. Isolation and screening of cellulolytic bacteria inhabiting different environment and optimization of cellulase production. Univ. J. Environ. Res. Technol. 3: 39-49.
  4. Shenkani K, Sundara C. 2015. Isolation and screening of potential cellulolytic bacteria from coir retting effluent. Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Dev. 2: 27-31.
  5. Garg R, Srivastava R, Brahma V, Verma L, Karthikeyan S, Sahni G. 2016. Biochemical and structural characterization of a novel halotolerant cellulase from soil metagenome. Sci. Rep. 6: 39634. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39634
  6. Sadhu S, Saha P, Sen SK, Mayilraj S, Maiti TK. 2013. Production, purification and characterization of a novel thermotolerant endoglucanase (CMCase) from Bacillus strain isolated from cow dung. SpringerPlus 2: 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-10
  7. Behera BC, Mishra RR, Singh SK, Dutta SK, Thatoi H. 2016. Cellulase from Bacillus licheniformis and Brucella sp. isolated from mangrove soils of Mahanadi river delta, Odisha, India. Biocatal. Biotransformation 34: 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242422.2016.1212846
  8. Neethu T, Patel K, Susheel S, Ganesh SS. 2017. Assessment of manure quality prepared from different crop residues inoculated with cellulolytic and lignolytic bacterial isolates. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 6: 1653-1661.
  9. Raj J, Amulya H, Snehalatha V. 2017. Isolation, screening, and characterisation of cellulolytic bacteria, determination of their cellulolytic potential. Int. J. Adv. Res. Ideas Innov. Technol. 3: 215-220.
  10. Lane D. 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. Nucleic Acid Techniques Bacterial Systematics. 115-175.
  11. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1596-1599. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm092
  12. Irfan M, Safdar A, Syed Q, Nadeem M. 2012. Isolation and screening of cellulolytic bacteria from soil and optimization of cellulase production and activity. Turk. J. Biochem. 37: 287-293. https://doi.org/10.5505/tjb.2012.09709
  13. Karmakar M, Ray RR. 2011. Current trends in research and application of microbial cellulases. Res. J. Microbiol. 6: 41. https://doi.org/10.3923/jm.2011.41.53
  14. Kaur M, Arora S. 2012. Isolation and screening of cellulose degrading bacteria in kitchen waste and detecting their degrading potential. IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng. 1: 33-35. https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-0123335
  15. Islam M, Aktar M, Rahman M. 2014. Determination of alpha-amylase activity of Streptomyces spp isolated from Bangladeshi soils. Int. J. Interdiscip. Multidiscip. Studies 10: 167-170.
  16. Vimal J, Venu A, Joseph J. 2016. Isolation and identification of cellulose degrading bacteria and optimization of the cellulase production. Int. J. Res. Biosci. 5: 58-67.
  17. Sethi S, Datta A, Gupta BL, Gupta S. 2013. Optimization of cellulase production from bacteria isolated from soil. ISRN Biotechnol. 2013: 985685. https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/985685
  18. Roth A, Fischer M, Hamid ME, Michalke S, Ludwig W, Mauch H. 1998. Differentiation of phylogenetically related slowly growing mycobacteria based on 16S-23S rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer sequences. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.36.1.139-147.1998
  19. Shivaji S, Chaturvedi P, Suresh K, Reddy G, Dutt C, Wainwright M, et al. 2006. Bacillus aerius sp. nov., Bacillus aerophilus sp. nov., Bacillus stratosphericus sp. nov. and Bacillus altitudinis sp. nov., isolated from cryogenic tubes used for collecting air samples from high altitudes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56: 1465-1473. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64029-0
  20. Elbanna K, Elnaggar S, Bakeer A. 2014. Characterization of B. acillus altitudinis as a new causative agent of bacterial soft rot. J. Phytopathol. 162: 712-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12250
  21. Aygan A, Karcioglu L, Arikan B. 2011. Alkaline thermostable and halophilic endoglucanase from Bacillus licheniformis C108. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10: 789-796.
  22. Maryam B, Qadir A, Zameer M, Ahmad SR, Nelofer R, Jamil N, et al. 2018. Production of cellulases by Bacillus cellulosilyticus using lignocellulosic material. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 27: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/74130
  23. Immanuel G, Bhagavath C, Yappa RP. 2007. Production and partial purification of cellulase by Aspergillus niger and A. fumigatus fermented in coir waste and sawdust. Internet J. Microbiol. 3: 1-11.
  24. Sonia A, Dasan KP. 2013. Chemical, morphology and thermal evaluation of cellulose microfibers obtained from Hibiscus sabdariffa. Carbohydr. Polym. 92: 668-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.015