Journal of Radiation Protection and Research

The Korean Association for Radiation Protection (대한방사선방어학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Validation of a Model for Estimating Individual External Dose Based on Ambient Dose Equivalent and Life Patterns

  • Sato, Rina (Sector of Fukushima Research and Development, Japan Atomic Energy Agency) ;
  • Yoshimura, Kazuya (Sector of Fukushima Research and Development, Japan Atomic Energy Agency) ;
  • Sanada, Yukihisa (Sector of Fukushima Research and Development, Japan Atomic Energy Agency) ;
  • Sato, Tetsuro (Public Solution Division, Hitachi Solutions East Japan Ltd.)
  • Received : 2021.07.29
  • Accepted : 2021.12.06
  • Published : 2022.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: After the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (FDNPS) accident, a model was developed to estimate the external exposure doses for residents who were expected to return to their homes after evacuation orders were lifted. However, the model's accuracy and uncertainties in parameters used to estimate external doses have not been evaluated. Materials and Methods: The model estimates effective doses based on the integrated ambient dose equivalent (H*(10)) and life patterns, considering a dose reduction factor to estimate the indoor H*(10) and a conversion factor from H*(10) to the effective dose. Because personal dose equivalent (Hp(10)) has been reported to agree well with the effective dose after the FDNPS accident, this study validates the model's accuracy by comparing the estimated effective doses with Hp(10). The Hp(10) and life pattern data were collected for 36 adult participants who lived or worked near the FDNPS in 2019. Results and Discussion: The estimated effective doses correlated significantly with Hp(10); however, the estimated effective doses were lower than Hp(10) for indoor sites. A comparison with the measured indoor H*(10) showed that the estimated indoor H*(10) was not underestimated. However, the Hp(10) to H*(10) ratio indoors, which corresponds to the practical conversion factor from H*(10) to the effective dose, was significantly larger than the same ratio outdoors, meaning that the conversion factor of 0.6 is not appropriate for indoors due to the changes in irradiation geometry and gamma spectra. This could have led to a lower effective dose than Hp(10). Conclusion: The estimated effective doses correlated significantly with Hp(10), demonstrating the model's applicability for effective dose estimation. However, the lower value of the effective dose indoors could be because the conversion factor did not reflect the actual environment.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study used the results of a project that Japan Atomic Energy Agency carried out as commissioned business by the Nuclear Regulation Authority, Japan.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Preliminary dose estimation from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012.
  2. Ministry of the Environment. How to calculate annual additional exposure dose [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of the Environment; 2011 [cited 2022 Mar 4]. Available from: http://www.env.go.jp/press/file_view.php?serial=18437&hou_id=14327.
  3. Nomura S, Tsubokura M, Hayano R, Furutani T, Yoneoka D, Kami M, et al. Comparison between direct measurements and modeled estimates of external radiation exposure among school children 18 to 30 months after the Fukushima nuclear accident in Japan. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(2):1009-1016. https://doi.org/10.1021/es503504y
  4. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation (Volume 1). New York, NY: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation; 2013.
  5. Hirose K, Fujimoto K. Reevaluation of time spent indoors used for exposure dose assessment. Kankyo Hoshano Josen GakkaiShi. 2016;4(2):97-104.
  6. Takahara S, Iijima M, Watanabe M. Assessment model of radiation doses from external exposure to the public after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Health Phys. 2020;118(6):664-677. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001176
  7. Japan Atomic Energy Agency. Report of the commissioned business about survey along with life pattern by the Nuclear Regulation Authority in FY 2019 [Internet]. Tokaimura, Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2020 [cited 2022 Mar 4]. Available from: https://radioactivity.nsr.go.jp/ja/contents/16000/15194/view.html.
  8. International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 74: conversion coefficients for use in radiological protection against external radiation. Stockholm, Sweden: International Commission on Radiological Protection; 1996.
  9. International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 116: conversion coefficients for radiological protection quantities for external radiation exposures. Stockholm, Sweden: International Commission on Radiological Protection; 2010.
  10. Saito K, Ishigure N, Petoussi-Henss N, Schlattl H. Effective dose conversion coefficients for radionuclides exponentially distributed in the ground. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2012;51(4):411-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-012-0432-y
  11. Saito K, Petoussi-Henss N. Ambient dose equivalent conversion coefficients for radionuclides exponentially distributed in the ground. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2014;51(10):1274-1287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2014.919885
  12. Japan Atomic Energy Agency, National Institute of Radiological Sciences. Researches on the characteristics of personal doses after the accident of TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (JAEA-Review-2015-007). Tokaimura, Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2015.
  13. Nuclear Regulation Authority. Basic concept of safety and security measures for returning [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Nuclear Regulation Authority; 2013 [cited 2022 Mar 4]. Available from: https://www.nsr.go.jp/data/000069185.pdf.
  14. Sato T, Andoh M, Sato M, Saito K. External dose evaluation based on detailed air dose rate measurements in living environments. J Environ Radioact. 2019;210:105973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.05.005
  15. Hirayama H. An evaluation of personal dosimeter for widely distributed 134Cs and 137Cs by using EGS code. Radioisotopes (Tokyo). 2013;62(6):335-345. https://doi.org/10.3769/radioisotopes.62.335
  16. Naito W, Uesaka M, Yamada C, Kurosawa T, Yasutaka T, Ishii H. Relationship between individual external doses, ambient dose rates and individuals' activity-patterns in affected areas in Fukushima following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0158879. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158879
  17. Nomura S, Tsubokura M, Hayano R, Yoneoka D, Ozaki A, Shimada Y, et al. Compliance with the proper use of an individual radiation dosimeter among children and the effects of improper use on the measured dose: a retrospective study 18-20 months following Japan's 2011 Fukushima nuclear incident. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009555. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009555
  18. Japan Atomic Energy Agency. Report of the commissioned business about survey along with life pattern by the Nuclear Regulation Authority in FY 2018 [Internet]. Tokaimura, Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2019 [cited 2022 Mar 4]. Available from: https://radioactivity.nsr.go.jp/ja/contents/15000/14769/view.html.
  19. Golikov V, Wallstrom E, Wohni T, Tanaka K, Endo S, Hoshi M. Evaluation of conversion coefficients from measurable to risk quantities for external exposure over contaminated soil by use of physical human phantoms. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2007;46(4):375-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-007-0121-4
  20. Akahane K, Yonai S, Fukuda S, Miyahara N, Yasuda H, Iwaoka K, et al. NIRS external dose estimation system for Fukushima residents after the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP accident. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1670. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01670
  21. Wainwright HM, Seki A, Chen J, Saito K. A multiscale Bayesian data integration approach for mapping air dose rates around the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. J Environ Radioact. 2017;167:62-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.11.033
  22. Japan Atomic Energy Agency. Report of the commissioned business about survey on the distribution of radioactive materials by the Nuclear Regulation Authority in FY 2018. [Internet]. Tokaimura, Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2019 [cited 2023 Mar 4]. Available from: https://radioactivity.nsr.go.jp/ja/contents/16000/15217/32/JAEArep_MAPproject_H31_20200807_7.pdf.
  23. Japan Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation monitoring using manned helicopter around the nuclear power station in the fiscal year 2018: contract research (JAEA-Technology-2019-016). Tokaimura, Japan: Japan Atomic Energy Agency; 2019.
  24. Andoh M, Matsuda N, Saito K. Evaluation of ambient dose equivalent rates owing to natural radioactive nuclides in eastern Japan by car-borne surveys using KURAMA-II. Nippon Genshiryoku Gakkai Wabun Ronbunshi (Online). 2017;16(2):63-80. https://doi.org/10.3327/taesj.J16.023
  25. Statistics Burea of Japan. Housing and land survey [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Statistics Burea; 2018 [cited 2022 Mar 4]. Available from: http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/jyutaku/index.html.
  26. International Atomic Energy Agency. Generic procedures for assessment and response during a radiological emergency (IAEATECDOC-1162). Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2000.
  27. Yoshida-Ohuchi H, Matsuda N, Saito K. Review of reduction factors by buildings for gamma radiation from radiocaesium deposited on the ground due to fallout. J Environ Radioact. 2018;187:32-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.02.006
  28. Matsuda N, Mikami S, Sato T, Saito K. Measurements of air dose rates in and around houses in the Fukushima Prefecture in Japan after the Fukushima accident. J Environ Radioact. 2017;166(Pt 3):427-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.03.012
  29. Yoshida-Ohuchi H, Hosoda M, Kanagami T, Uegaki M, Tashima H. Reduction factors for wooden houses due to external γ-radiation based on in situ measurements after the Fukushima nuclear accident. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7541. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07541
  30. Murayama K. D-shuttle electric dosimeter and its applications. Radioisotopes (Online). 2018;67(9):453-460. https://doi.org/10.3769/radioisotopes.67.453