Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology(JNFCWT) (방사성폐기물학회지)

Korean Radioactive Waste Society (한국방사성폐기물학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Algorithm for Computational Age Dating of Nuclear Material for Nuclear Forensic Purposes

  • Received : 2021.11.29
  • Accepted : 2022.06.24
  • Published : 2022.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The parent and daughter nuclides in a radioactive decay chain arrive at secular equilibrium once they have a large half-life difference. The characteristics of this equilibrium state can be used to estimate the production time of nuclear materials. In this study, a mathematical model and algorithm that can be applied to radio-chronometry using the radioactive equilibrium relationship were investigated, reviewed, and implemented. A Bateman equation that can analyze the decay of radioactive materials over time was used for the mathematical model. To obtain a differential-based solution of the Bateman equation, an algebraic numerical solution approach and two different matrix exponential functions (Moral and Levy) were implemented. The obtained result was compared with those of commonly used algorithms, such as the Chebyshev rational approximation method and WISE Uranium. The experimental analysis confirmed the similarity of the results. However, the Moral method led to an increasing calculation uncertainty once there was a branching decay, so this aspect must be improved. The time period corresponding to the production of nuclear materials or nuclear activity can be estimated using the proposed algorithm when uranium or its daughter nuclides are included in the target materials for nuclear forensics.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation Of Nuclear Safety (KoFONS) and financial resources from the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC), Republic of Korea (Grant No. 2004025).

References

  1. B. Briyatmoko. Identification of High Confidence Nuclear Forensics Signatures for Mining, Milling and Conversion Process, International Atomic Energy Agency Report, IAEA-TECDOC-1820 (2017).
  2. International Atomic Energy Agency. Application of Nuclear Forensics in Combating Illicit Trafficking of Nuclear and Other Radioactive Material, IAEA Report, IAEA-TECDOC-1730 (2014).
  3. H. Bateman, "Solution of a System of Differential Equations Occurring in the Theory of Radioactive Transformations", in: Proceeding of the Cambridge Philosophical Society: Mathematical and Physical Science, 15, 423-427, Cambridge Philosophical Society, Cambridge (1910).
  4. J. Cetnar, P. Stanisz, and M. Oettingen, "Linear Chain Method for Numerical Modelling of Burnup Systems", Energies, 14(6), 1520 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061520
  5. A.F. Pacheco and L. Moral, "Algebraic Approach to the Radioactive Decay Equations", Am. J. Phys., 71, 684 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1571834
  6. E. Levy, "Decay Chain Differential Equations: Solutions Through Matrix Analysis", Comput. Phys. Commun., 234, 188-194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2018.07.011
  7. A. E. Isotalo and P.A. Aarnio, "Comparison of Depletion Algorithms for Large Systems of Nuclides", Ann. Nucl. Energy, 38(2-3), 261-268 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2010.10.019
  8. A.G. Croff, "ORIGEN2: A Versatile Computer Code for Calculating the Nuclide Compositions and Characteristics of Nuclear Materials", Nucl. Technol., 62(3), 335-352 (1983). https://doi.org/10.13182/NT83-1
  9. M. Pusa and J. Leppanen, "Computing the Matrix Exponential in Burnup Calculations", Nucl. Sci. Eng., 164(2), 140-150 (2010). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE09-14
  10. M.J. Kristo, A.M. Gaffney, N. Marks, K. Knight, W.S. Cassata, and Ian D. Hutcheon, "Nuclear Forensic Science: Analysis of Nuclear Material Out of Regulatory Control", Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 44, 555-579 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012309
  11. R.W. Williams, A.M. Gaffney, and M.J. Kristo. Radiochronometry Guidance, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Technical Report, LLNL-TR-701379 (2016).
  12. International Technical Working Group, ITWG Guideline on Age Dating (Production Date Determination), ITWG-INFL-APDP-v1 (2016).
  13. A.L. Fauree and T. Dalger, "Age Dating of Individual Micrometer-Sized Uranium Particles by Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry: An Additional Fingerprint for Nuclear Safeguards Purposes", Anal. Chem., 89(12), 6663-6669 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00887
  14. T.M. Kayzar, and R.W. Williams, "Developing 226Ra and 227Ac Age-Dating Techniques for Nuclear Forensics to Gain Insight From Concordant and Nonconcordant Radiochronometers", J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 307(3), 2061-2068 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4435-4
  15. Z. Varga, C. Venchiarutti, A. Nicholl, J. Krajko, R. Jakopic, K. Mayer, S. Richter, and Y. Aregbe, "IRMM- 1000a and IRMM-1000b Uranium Reference Materials Certified for the Production Date. Part I: Methodology, Preparation and Target Characteristics", J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 307(2), 1077-1085 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4227-x
  16. Z. Varga, A. Nicholl, J. Zsigrai, M. Wallenius, and K. Mayer, "Methodology for the Preparation and Validation of Plutonium Age Dating Materials", Anal. Chem., 90(6), 4019-4024 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b05204
  17. A.M. Gaffney, J.B.N. Wimpenny, T. Parsons-Davis, R.W. Williams, R.A. Torrese, and B.W. Chung, "A Case Study in Plutonium Radiochronometry Using Multiple Isotope Systems", J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 318(1), 287-295 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6131-7
  18. MathWorks. 2021. "Explanation of Funm (Evaluate General Matrix Function) Function." MathWorks. Accessed Nov. 8 2021. Available from: https://kr.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/funm.
  19. MathWorks. 2021. "Explanation of Vpasolve (Solve Equations Numerically) Function." MathWorks. Accessed Nov. 8 2021. Available from: https://kr.mathworks.com/help/symbolic/sym.vpasolve.
  20. A. Morgenstern, C. Apostolidis, and K. Mayer, "Age Determination of Highly Enriched Uranium: Separation and Analysis of 231Pa", Anal. Chem., 74(21), 5513-5516 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac0203948
  21. Korea Laboratory Accreditation Scheme, Guidelines for Estimating and Expressing Uncertainty in Measurement Results, KOLAS-G-002 (2020).
  22. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Bateman Equation Adaptation for Solving and Integrating Peak Activity Into EPA ELCR and Dose Models, ORNL Report, ORNL/TM-2020/1780 (2020).
  23. World Information Service on Energy Uranium Project. December 14 2020. "Universal Decay Calculator." WISE Uranium Project. Accessed Nov. 15 2021. Available from: https://www.wise-uranium.org/rcc.html.
  24. A.M. Gaffney, A. Hubert, W.S. Kinman, M. Magara, A. Okubo, F. Pointurier, K.C. Schorzman, R.E. Steiner, and R.W. Williams, "Round-Robin 230Th-234U Age Dating of Bulk Uranium for Nuclear Forensics", J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 307, 2055-2060 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4334-8