DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Maternal nutrition altered embryonic MYOD1, MYF5, and MYF6 gene expression in genetically fat and lean lines of chickens

  • Li, Feng (Institute of Animal Nutrition, Northeast Agricultural University) ;
  • Yang, Chunxu (Institute of Animal Nutrition, Northeast Agricultural University) ;
  • Xie, Yingjie (Institute of Animal Nutrition, Northeast Agricultural University) ;
  • Gao, Xiang (Institute of Animal Nutrition, Northeast Agricultural University) ;
  • Zhang, Yuanyuan (Institute of Animal Nutrition, Northeast Agricultural University) ;
  • Ning, Hangyi (Institute of Animal Nutrition, Northeast Agricultural University) ;
  • Liu, Guangtao (Institute of Animal Nutrition, Northeast Agricultural University) ;
  • Chen, Zhihui (Institute of Animal Nutrition, Northeast Agricultural University) ;
  • Shan, Anshan (Institute of Animal Nutrition, Northeast Agricultural University)
  • 투고 : 2021.11.27
  • 심사 : 2022.01.29
  • 발행 : 2022.08.01

초록

Objective: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of daily feed intake during the laying period on embryonic myogenic differentiation 1 (MYOD1), myogenic factor 5 (MYF5), and myogenic factor 6 (MYF6) gene expression in genetically fat and lean lines of chickens. Methods: An experiment in a 2×2 factorial design was conducted with two dietary intake levels (100% and 75% of nutrition recommendation) and two broiler chicken lines (fat and lean). Two lines of hens (n = 384 for each line) at 23th week of age were randomly divided into 4 treatments with 12 replicates of 16 birds. The experiment started at 27th week of age (5% egg rate) and ended at 54th week of age. Hatched eggs from the medium laying period were collected. Real time polymerase chain reaction analysis was used to analyse the MYOD1, MYF5, and MYF6 mRNA levels of E7, E9, E11, E13, and E15 body tissues and E17, E19, and E21 chest and thigh muscle samples. Results: The results indicated that there were significant effects of line, dietary intake, and interactions between them on MYOD1, MYF5, and MYF6 gene mRNA expression levels in embryonic tissues. Low daily feed intake did not change the expression trend of MYOD1 mRNA in either line, but changed the peak values, especially in lean line. Low daily feed intake altered the trend in MYF5 mRNA expression level in both lines and apparently delayed its onset. There was no apparent effect of low daily feed intake on the trends of MYF6 mRNA expression levels in either line, but it significantly changed the values on many embryonic days. Conclusion: Maternal nutrient restriction affects myogenesis and is manifested in the expression of embryonic MYOD1, MYF5, and MYF6 genes. Long term selection for fat deposition in broiler chickens changes the pattern and intensity of myogenesis.

키워드

과제정보

We would like to thank the Poultry Breeding Group of the College of Animal Science and Technology at the Northeast Agricultural University for offering the birds. This study was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2012CB124703).

참고문헌

  1. Velleman SG. Muscle development in the embryo and hatchling. Poult Sci 2007;86:1050-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.5.1050
  2. Sassoon DA. Myogenic regulatory factors: dissecting their role and regulation during vertebrate embryogenesis. Dev Biol 1993;156:11-23. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1993.1055
  3. Picard B, Lefaucheur L, Berri C, Duclos MJ. Muscle fibre ontogenesis in farm animal species. Reprod Nutr Dev 2002;42:415-31. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2002035
  4. Al-Musawi SL, Lock F, Simbi BH, Bayol SAM, Stickland NC. Muscle specific differences in the regulation of myogenic differentiation in chickens genetically selected for divergent growth rates. Differentiation 2011;82:127-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2011.05.012
  5. Pas MFW, Everts ME, Haagsman HP. Muscle development of livestock animals: physiology, genetics, and meat quality. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: Cambridge, MA, USA: CABI Pub; 2004.
  6. Matsakas A, Patel K. Skeletal muscle fibre plasticity in response to selected environmental and physiological stimuli. Histol Histopathol 2009;24:611-29. https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-24.611
  7. Rehfeldt C, Te Pas MFW, Wimmers K, et al. Advances in research on the prenatal development of skeletal muscle in animals in relation to the quality of muscle-based food. I. Regulation of myogenesis and environmental impact. Animal 2011;5:703-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110002089
  8. Li F, Xu LM, Shan AS, Hu JW, Zhang YY, Li YH. Effect of daily feed intake in laying period on laying performance, egg quality and egg composition of genetically fat and lean lines of chickens. Br Poult Sci 2011;52:163-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2011.559455
  9. Peebles ED, Zumwalt CD, Doyle SM, et al. Effects of breeder age and dietary fat source and level on broiler hatching egg characteristics. Poult Sci 2000;79:698-704. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.5.698
  10. Noble RC, Cocchi M. Lipid metabolism and the neonatal chicken. Prog Lipid Res 1990;29:107-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-7827(90)90014-C
  11. Li F, Shan AS, Hu JW, Zheng YB, Xu LM, Chen ZH. Changes to daily feed intake during the laying period alters embryonic MSTN and MYOG gene expression in genetically fat and lean lines of chickens. Br Poult Sci 2013;54:728-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2013.853868
  12. Wang H-B, Li H, Wang Q-G, et al. Profiling of chicken adipose tissue gene expression by genome array. BMC Genomics 2007;8:193. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-8-193
  13. Zhang H, Wang S, Li H, et al. Microsatellite markers linked to quantitative trait loci affecting fatness in divergently selected chicken lines for abdominal fat. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2008;21:1389-94. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70732
  14. Jin P, Wu X, Xu S, et al. Differential expression of six genes and correlation with fatness traits in a unique broiler population. Saudi J Biol Sci 2017;24:945-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.04.014
  15. Zhang H, Shen L-Y, Xu Z-C, et al. Haplotype-based genome-wide association studies for carcass and growth traits in chicken. Poult Sci 2020;99:2349-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.01.009
  16. CMOA. Feeding standard of chicken. Beijing, China: CMOA; 2004.
  17. Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. New York, USA: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001.
  18. Renema RA, Robinson FE. Defining normal: comparison of feed restriction and full feeding of female broiler breeders. Worlds Poult Sci J 2004;60:508-22. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200434
  19. van der Waaij EH, van den Brand H, van Arendonk JM, Kemp B. Effect of match or mismatch of maternal-offspring nutritional environment on the development of offspring in broiler chickens. Animal 2011;5:741-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110002387
  20. Hynd PI, Weaver S, Edwards NM, Heberle ND, Bowling M. Developmental programming: a new frontier for the poultry industry? Anim Prod Sci 2016;56:1233-8. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15373
  21. Henriksen R, Rettenbacher S, GG Groothuis T. Maternal corticosterone elevation during egg formation in chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) influences offspring traits, partly via prenatal undernutrition. Gen Comp Endocrinol 2013;191:83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.05.028
  22. Yahav S, Brake J. Chick embryogenesis: a unique platform to study the effects of environmental factors on embryo development. J Stem Cells 2014;9:17-37. https://doi.org/jsc.2014.9.1.17
  23. Zhu MJ, Ford SP, Means WJ, Hess BW, Nathanielsz PW, Du M. Maternal nutrient restriction affects properties of skeletal muscle in offspring. J Physiol 2006;575:241-50. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.112110
  24. Pownall ME, Gustafsson MK, Emerson CP. Myogenic regulatory factors and the specification of muscle progenitors in vertebrate embryos. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2002;18:747-83. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.18.012502.105758
  25. Rudnicki MA, Braun T, Hinuma S, Jaenisch R. Inactivation of MyoD in mice leads to up-regulation of the myogenic HLH gene Myf-5 and results in apparently normal muscle development. Cell 1992;71:383-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(92)90508-A
  26. Rudnicki MA, Schnegelsberg PNJ, Stead RH, Braun T, Arnold H-H, Jaenisch R. MyoD or Myf-5 is required for the formation of skeletal muscle. Cell 1993;75:1351-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90621-V
  27. Sorrentino V, Pepperkok R, Davis RL, Ansorge W, Philipson L. Cell proliferation inhibited by MyoD1 independently of myogenic differentiation. Nature 1990;345:813-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/345813a0
  28. Ishibashi J, Perry RL, Asakura A, Rudnicki MA. MyoD induces myogenic differentiation through cooperation of its NH2- and COOH-terminal regions. J Cell Biol 2005;171:471-82. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200502101
  29. Crow MT, Stockdale FE. Myosin expression and specialization among the earliest muscle fibers of the developing avian limb. Dev Biol 1986;113:238-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(86)90126-0
  30. Lee ASJ, Zhang M, Evans DJR. Changes in the proportion and number of Pax(7+ve) and MF20(+ve) myoblasts during chick myogenesis in the head and limb. Int J Dev Biol 2004;48:31-8. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.15005572
  31. Dwyer CM, Stickland NC, Fletcher JM. The influence of maternal nutrition on muscle fiber number development in the porcine fetus and on subsequent postnatal growth. J Anim Sci 1994;72:911-7. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.724911x
  32. Braun T, Arnold HH. Myf-5 and myoD genes are activated in distinct mesenchymal stem cells and determine different skeletal muscle cell lineages. EMBO J 1996;15:310-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00361.x
  33. Braun T, Bober E, Winter B, Rosenthal N, Arnold HH. Myf-6, a new member of the human gene family of myogenic determination factors: evidence for a gene cluster on chromosome 12. EMBO J 1990;9:821-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08179.x
  34. Miner JH, Wold B. Herculin, a fourth member of the MyoD family of myogenic regulatory genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1990;87:1089-93. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.3.1089
  35. Feldman JL, Stockdale FE. Temporal appearance of satellite cells during myogenesis. Dev Biol 1992;153:217-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(92)90107-R
  36. Hartley RS, Bandman E, Yablonka-Reuveni Z. Skeletal muscle satellite cells appear during late chicken embryogenesis. Dev Biol 1992;153:206-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(92)90106-Q
  37. Moss FP, Leblond CP. Satellite cells as the source of nuclei in muscles of growing rats. Anat Rec 1971;170:421-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091700405
  38. Li F, Xie Y, Yang X, Zhang Y, Cheng B, Shan A. Effects of nutritional restriction during laying period of fat and lean line broiler breeder hens on meat quality traits of offspring. Animals 2021;11:2434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082434
  39. Stockdale FE, Miller JB. The cellular basis of myosin heavy chain isoform expression during development of avian skeletal muscles. Dev Biol 1987;123:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(87)90420-9
  40. Ekmark M, Rana ZA, Stewart G, Hardie DG, Gundersen K. De-phosphorylation of MyoD is linking nerve-evoked activity to fast myosin heavy chain expression in rodent adult skeletal muscle. J Physiol 2007;584:637-50. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.141457
  41. Ehlers ML, Celona B, Black BL. NFATc1 controls skeletal muscle fiber type and is a negative regulator of myod activity. Cell Rep 2014;8:1639-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.035
  42. Chen W, Lv YT, Zhang HX, Ruan D, Wang S, Lin YC. Developmental specificity in skeletal muscle of late-term avian embryos and its potential manipulation. Poult Sci 2013;92:2754-64. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03099