한국도서관정보학회지 (Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society)

한국도서관정보학회 (Korean Library and Information Science Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

토픽모델링을 활용한 물리학 독서감상문 텍스트의 교육과정 연계성 분석

Curriculum Relevance Analysis of Physics Book Report Text Using Topic Modeling

  • 투고 : 2022.06.08
  • 심사 : 2022.06.18
  • 발행 : 2022.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 '물리학' 수업에서 교과독서 활동으로 작성된 독후감상문의 교육과정 연계성을 분석하는데 목적이 있다. 연구를 수행하기 위해 교과독서 활동으로 작성한 332편의 물리학 독서감상문을 수집하여 키워드와 키워드들의 연결 관계를 분석하고, STM(Structural Topic Modeling)을 적용하여 토픽을 추출하였다. 분석 결과, 물리학 독서감상문의 주요 키워드는 '생각', '내용', '설명', '이론', '사람', '이해' 등으로 나타났으며, 도출된 키워드의 영향력과 연결 관계를 살펴보기 위해 연결중심성, 매개중심성, 위세중심성을 제시하였다. 토픽모델링 분석 결과, 물리학 교육과정과 관련된 11개 토픽이 추출되었으며, 3과목(물리학I, 물리학II, 과학사), 6개 영역(힘과 운동, 현대물리, 파동, 열과 에너지, 서양과학사, 과학이란 무엇인가)에서 교육과정 연계성을 확인할 수 있었다. 본 연구의 결과는 추후 교과 특성을 반영한 교과독서를 보다 체계적으로 시행할 수 있는 근거자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

This study analyzed the relevance of the curriculum by applying topic modeling to book reports written as content area reading activities in the 'physics' class. In order to carry out the research, 332 physics book reports were collected to analyze the relevance among keywords and topics were extracted using STM. The result of the analysis showed that the main keywords of the physics book reports were 'thought', 'content', 'explain', 'theory', 'person', 'understanding'. To examine the influence and connection relationship of the derived keywords, the study presented degree centrality, between centrality, and eigenvetor centrality. As a result of the topic modeling analysis, eleven topics related to the physics curriculum were extracted, and the curriculum linkage could be drawn in three subjects (Physics I, Physics II, Science History), and six areas (force and motion, modern physics, wave, heat and energy, Western science history, and What is science). The analyzed results can be used as evidence for a more systematic implementation of content area reading activities which reflect the subject characteristics in the future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cheon, Gyeong-rok (2016). Perceptions of high school teacher about disciplinary reading: focused on literature, history, science, and mathematics. Journal of Reading Research, 47(4), 97-124. https://doi.org/10.17095/JRR.2018.47.4
  2. Choi, Jaewon, Lee, Ho, Kim, Jungmin, & Song, Juho (2017). A comparative analysis of curriculums for software-related departments based on topic modeling. The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 22(4), 193-241.
  3. Han, Chaeyeon, Kim, Woo-Sik, & Yoon, Dong-Keun (2021). A comparative analysis of disaster research trends using topic modeling and network analysis. Journal of The Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 21(5), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2021.21.5.79
  4. Han, Sungmin & Shin, Hyun-Chul (2017). The effect of content-area reading applied to high school chemistry class. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(3), 377-397.
  5. Hong, Sangwook, Lim, Eunkyung, Jang, Myoung-Duk, & Jeong, Jinwoo (2004). The effect of interpretive style scientific reading materialson the change of high school students' philosophical viewpoints on science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(2), 234-245.
  6. Jang, Hye-Jin & Shin, Young-Joon (2009). Effect of the activity after reading books on science toward creativity. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(2), 187-196.
  7. Kim, Junhyeon (2015). An essay for understanding the meaning of the network text analysis results in study of the public administration. The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 16, 247-280.
  8. Kim, Juyeon & Hong, Seung-Ho (2014). The effects of plant-related reading activity on concept change of elementary students about 'Organs of Plant'. Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 25(1), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.25.1.201403.151
  9. Kim, Soyoung (2005). Problems and improvements of reading certification program by description of impressions verifying keyword. The Society for the Study of Korean Arts Education, 9(6), 25-66.
  10. Korean Ministry of Education (2015a). Introduction to Elementary and Secondary School Curriculum. Korean Ministry of Education Notice No. 2015-74 [Attachment 1].
  11. Korean Ministry of Education (2015b). Science Curriculum. Korean Ministry of Education. Notice No. 2015-74 [Attachment 9].
  12. Lee, Hyejun, Lee, Dongil, & Lee, Juhyun (2010). Development of franchise education program through semantic network analysis. Korea Business Review, 14(2), 105-128.
  13. Lee, Soonyoung, Choi, Sookgi, Kim, Joohwan, Seo, Hyuk, & Park, Young-min (2019). Reading Education Theory. Seoul: Social Criticism Academy.
  14. Lee, Soo-Sang (2014). A content analysis of journal articles using the language network analysis methods. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(4), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.4.049
  15. Lee, Soo-Sang (2016). A study on the application of topic modeling for the book report text. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.4.201612.1
  16. Lee, Soo-Sang (2018). Application and Limitations of Network Analysis Methods. Seoul: Chungram.
  17. Lim, Seongman (2021). A comparison of science disciplinary reading's meaning contained in the science book reviews of earth science pre-service teachers and primary pre-service teachers. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 14(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2021.14.1.69
  18. Moon, Young-Joo (2020). An analysis of trends in researches on the open recruitment system for principals based on topic modeling and keyword network analysis. Journal of Education & Culture, 26(1), 217-242. https://doi.org/10.24159/JOEC.2020.26.1.217
  19. Nahm, Choon-Ho (2016). An Illustrative application of topic modeling method to a farmer's diary. Cross-Cultural Studies, 22(1), 89-135.
  20. Park, Soo-Hyun, Choi, Kyung-Hee, & Lee, Hyunju (2007). The effects of introducing science-related reading materials on the enhancement of high school students' attitudes toward reading, science, and career exploration. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 7(1), 353-370.
  21. Park, Soojah (2005). The meaning & implications of content area reading. Journal of Reading Research, 14, 35-54.
  22. Rhee, June-Woong & Kim, Seong-hee (2018). News frames in the coverage of fine-dust disaster: Application of Structural Topic Modeling. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 62(4), 125-158. https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2018.62.4.004
  23. Ryu, Bora & Seo, Su-Hyun (2013). Analysis on the aspects of reading in reading reports of secondary school students. Journal of CheongRam Korean Language Education, 47, 35-60.
  24. Woo, Chang-Woo & Lee, Jong-Yun (2020). Investigation of research topic and trends of national ICT research-development using the LDA model. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 11(7), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2020.11.7.009
  25. Yeum, Eun-Yeul (2005). Rethinking of a method of literary therapy in 'Journal of Literary Therapy'. Journal of Reading Research, 14, 315-333.
  26. Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
  27. Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2007). A correlated topic model of science. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 1(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-AOAS114
  28. Hoffman, J. L., Collins, M. F., & Schickedanz, J. A. (2015). Instructional challenges in developing young children's science concepts. The Reading Teacher, 68(5), 363-372. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1325
  29. Kuhn, K. D. (2018). Using structural topic modeling to identify latent topics and trends in aviation incident reports. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 87, 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.12.018
  30. Michalsky, T. (2013). Integrating skills and wills instruction in self-regulated science text reading for secondary students. International Journal of Science Education, 35(11), 1846-1873. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.805890
  31. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Airoldi, E. M. (2016). A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(515), 988-1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1141684