DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Metadata Interoperability between the National Research Data Platform and the Bio Research Data Platform

국가 연구데이터플랫폼과 바이오 연구데이터플랫폼의 메타데이터 상호운용성에 관한 연구

  • 박성은 (성균관대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 고영만 (성균관대학교 문과대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2022.05.14
  • Accepted : 2022.06.08
  • Published : 2022.06.30

Abstract

The 'National Research Data Platform' and the 'Bio Research Data Platform' were recently built and each is actively creating an ecosystem. It is built independently based on other metadata standards, which may cause future interoperability issues. The purpose of this study is to propose a basis for metadata interoperability between the two platforms. To this end, the metadata standards of each platform were analyzed, crosswork targets were selected and mapped, and the suitability of the mapped elements was verified through experts in the bio field. And more appropriate mapping elements were recommended to derive metadata elements for datasets and files. Through this, it was possible to confirm the possibility that the metadata of each platform could be semantically linked and the basis for securing interoperability.

'국가 연구데이터플랫폼'과 '바이오 연구데이터플랫폼'은 비교적 최근 구축되어 활발하게 각각의 생태계를 만들어 가고 있다. 따라서 다른 메타데이터 표준을 기반으로 독립적으로 구축되어 향후 상호운용성의 문제가 발생할 수 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 각 플랫폼의 메타데이터 요소를 매핑하고, 이를 검증하여 상호운용성을 확보하기 위한 기반을 제안하는 것이다. 이를 위해 각 플랫폼의 메타데이터 표준을 분석하고 크로스워크 대상을 선정하여 매핑한 후, 바이오 분야 전문가를 통해 매핑된 요소의 적합성을 검증하고 더 적절한 매핑 요소를 추천받아 데이터셋 및 파일에 대한 메타데이터 요소를 도출하였다. 이를 통해 각 플랫폼의 메타데이터가 의미적으로 연결될 수 있는 가능성과 상호운용성 확보를 위한 기반을 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 성균관대학교 및 교육부, 한국연구재단의 4단계 두뇌한국21 사업 대학원혁신으로 지원된 연구임.

References

  1. Act on Securing, Management and Utilization of Bioresearch Resources. Law No. 16016
  2. Choi, Gi-young, Sung, Yun-Mo, Cho, Myoung-rae, Park, Youngsun, Kim, Kyung-Kyu, Kim Hyeonsu, Park, NeungHoo, Moon, Seong-Hyeok, Lee, Eui-Kyung, & Park, Jong-Ho (2020). The 3rd National Life Research Resource Management and Utilization Basic Plan (2020~'25) (draft). Council of National Science and Technology Advisory Council.
  3. Gang, Ju-Yeon (2017). A Study on Analysis of the Current Status and the Method to Improve Biotechnology Research Data Management. Master's thesis, Graduate School of Archives and Records Management, Chonbuk National University.
  4. Kim, Juseop, Han, Yeonjung, Youe, Wonjae, & Kim, Suntae (2020b). A study on the design of metadata for research data management in forestry engineering. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 54(4), 169-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.4.169
  5. Kim, Juseop, Kim, Suntae, & Choi, Sangki (2020). A study on functional details and importance of geoscience research data management. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 54(1), 411-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.1.411
  6. Kim, Juseop, Yoon, Heenam, Kwon, Yong-su, & Kim, Suntae (2020a). Metadata design for ecological research data: focused on DCAT. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 51(4), 249-278. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.51.4.202012.249
  7. Kim, Sun (2022). An exploratory study of biotechnology scientists' research data sharing intention: the moderating effects of academic reputation. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 39(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2022.39.1.045
  8. Kim, Sungwook & Kim, Suntae (2020). A study on the research data management methods for the condensed matter physics. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 37(3), 77-106. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.3.077
  9. Ko, Young-Man (2019). Study on a Model for Metadata Quality and Usability Assessment of the National Research Data Platform. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.
  10. Ko, Young-Man, Seo, Tae-sul, & Lim, Tae-Hoon (2007). A study on metadata mapping for semantic interoperability. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 24(4), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2007.24.4.223
  11. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (2018). Establishing a system for sharing and disseminating research data.
  12. Lee, Mihwa, Lee, Eun-Ju, & Rho, Jee-Hyun (2020). A preliminary study on extending OAK metadata for research data. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 51(3), 27-51. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.51.3.202009.27
  13. Nam, Taewoo & Lee, Seungmin (2014). Resource Description and Metadata. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  14. Park, Miyoung, Ahn, Inja, & Kim, Junmo (2018). A study on use case of research data sharing in biotechnology. Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science, 29(1), 393-416. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2018.29.1.393
  15. Republic of Korea. Ministry of Science and ICT (2020). Bio Research Data Standard Registration Form.
  16. The Integrated metadata for the scientific data. TTAK.KO -10.0976
  17. Yea, Sang-Jun, Jang, Ho, & Kim, Suntae (2019). Metadata element design for Korean medicine research data management and re-use. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 53(2), 223-246. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.2.223
  18. UK Data Archive (2011). Managing and Sharing Data: Best Practice For Researchers. UK: UK Data Archive