DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of 3D Mesh Accuracy and Completeness of Combination of Drone and Smartphone Images for Building 3D Modeling

건물3D모델링을 위한 드론과 스마트폰영상 조합의 3D메쉬 정확도 및 완성도 분석

  • Han, Seung-Hee (Department of Urban Engineering, Kongju National University) ;
  • Yoo, Sang-Hyeon (Department of Urban Engineering, Kongju National University)
  • 한승희 (공주대학교 도시융합시스템공학과) ;
  • 유상현 (공주대학교 도시융합시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2022.03.21
  • Accepted : 2022.06.22
  • Published : 2022.06.30

Abstract

Drone photogrammetry generally acquires images vertically or obliquely from above, so when photographing for the purpose of three-dimensional modeling, image matching for the ground of a building and spatial accuracy of point cloud data are poor, resulting in poor 3D mesh completeness. Therefore, to overcome this, this study analyzed the spatial accuracy of each drone image by acquiring smartphone images from the ground, and evaluated the accuracy improvement and completeness of 3D mesh when the smartphone image is not combined with the drone image. As a result of the study, the horizontal (x,y) accuracy of drone photogrammetry was about 1/200,000, similar to that of traditional photogrammetry. In addition, it was analyzed that the accuracy according to the photographing method was more affected by the photographing angle of the object than the increase in the number of photos. In the case of the smartphone image combination, the accuracy was not significantly affected, but the completeness of the 3D mesh was able to obtain a 3D mesh of about LoD3 that satisfies the digital twin city standard. Therefore, it is judged that it can be sufficiently used to build a 3D model for digital twin city by combining drone images and smartphones or DSLR images taken on the ground.

드론사진측량은 일반적으로 상공에서 수직 또는 경사로 영상을 획득하므로 3차원 모델링을 위한 목적으로 촬영할 경우 건물의 지면부분에 대한 영상매칭과 점군데이터의 공간정확도가 불량하여 3D메쉬의 완성도가 떨어진다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 이를 극복하기 위해 드론영상과 지상에서 스마트폰 영상을 획득하여 각각의 공간정확도를 분석함은 물론 드론영상에 스마트폰영상을 조합하지 않았을 경우와 조합해석 했을 경우의 정확도 향상과 3D메쉬의 완성도를 평가하였다. 연구결과 드론사진측량의 수평(x,y)정확도는 1/200,000정도로 전통적인 사진측량 정확도와 유사하였다. 또한, 촬영방법에 따른 정확도는 사진맷수의 증가보다 대상물에 대한 촬영각도에 영향을 더 받는 것으로 분석되었다. 스마트폰영상 조합의 경우 정확도에 별다른 영향을 미치지 않았으나 3D메쉬의 완성도는 디지털트윈시티 기준을 만족하는 LoD3급의 3D메쉬를 얻을 수 있었다. 따라서, 드론영상과 지상에서 촬영한 스마트폰 또는 DSLR영상을 조합처리 함으로써 디지털트윈시티를 위한 3D모델 구축에 충분히 활용할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 2021년도 국립공주대학교 학술연구지원으로 수행되었으며 이에 감사드립니다.

References

  1. 국토지리정보원. 2018. 무인비행장치 이용 공공 측량작업지침https://law.go.kr/admRulLsInfoP.do?admRulSeq=2100000118823(검색일: 2022. 1.11)
  2. Kim DP, Back KS, Kim SB. 2021. Production and Accuracy Analysis of Topographic Status Map Using Drone Images. Journal of the Korean Geo- Environmental Society. 22(2):35-39. https://doi.org/10.14481/JKGES.2021.22.2.35
  3. Kim MS, Park DY. 2020. A Study on Feasible 3D Object Model Generation Plan Based on Utilization Demand, and Generation Cost. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 50(1):215-229. https://doi.org/10.22640/LXSIRI.2020.50.1.215
  4. Kwak SH, Seo YJ, Song JH, Lyu SW. 2016. Accuracy Evaluation of Floodplain Topography Survey Using Small-scale UAV. Proceeding of Korea Water Resources Association. p.449-453.
  5. Do MS, Lim ET, Chae JH, Kim SH. 2018. Accuracy Evaluation and Terrain Model Creation of Urban Space using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle System. ITS. 17(5): 117-127.
  6. Park KC, Won JH, Lee JG, Lee SB. 2019. Analyze the Accuracy of using Drone 3D Point-cloud in Civil Survey Fields. Proceedings of Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science. p.11-13.
  7. Park JK, Um DY. 2019. Evaluation of Accuracy and Utilization of the Drone Photogrammetry for Open-pit Mine Monitoring. THE SOCIETY OF DIGITAL POLICY & MANAGEMENT. 17(12): 191-196.
  8. Baek SH, Jang CS. 2021. Case Study on 3D Heritage Building Modeling AccuracyUsing a Drone and a Laser. 韓國軍事學論集 第77輯 第3卷: 577-593.
  9. Sung HK, Chong KS, Lee CN. 2019. Accuracy Analysis of Low- cost UAV Photogrammetry for Road Sign Positioning. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography. 37(4): 243-251. https://doi.org/10.7848/KSGPC.2019.37.4.243
  10. Jang HM, Kim HJ, Kang HY. 2021. Building Large-scale CityGML Feature for Digital 3D Infrastructure, Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography. 39(3):187-201. https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc. 2021.39.3.187
  11. Jeong CS, Ahn JH, Shin HJ. 2014. Accuracy Analysis of River Topography Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Proceeding of Korean Society of Civil Engineers. p.859-860.
  12. Han SH, Kim KM. 2020. Proposal for the 3D model accuracy of Heterogeneous Image Data Combination in Drone Photogrammetry. Proceedings of Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science. pp.55-56.
  13. Han SH, Yoo SH. 2020. Proposal for the 3D model enhancement of Heterogeneous Image Data Combination in Drone Photogrammetry. Proceedings of Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science. pp.61-62.
  14. Han SH, Yoo SH, Kim KM. 2020. Completion Analysis of 3- Dimensional Modeling in Building by Combination of Drone Photography Method, Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry, and Cartography Proceeding, pp. 183-184.
  15. Biljecki F, Ledoux H, Stoter J. 2014. Height referen ces of CityGML LOD1 buildings and their infu ence on applications. In: Proceedings of the IS PRS 3D GeoInfo conference. 1-13. https:// doi.org/10.4233/uuid:09d030b5-67d3-467b-babb-5e5ec10f1b38
  16. Brown D.C. 1980. Application of Close-Range Photogrammetry th Measurements of Structures in Orbit, Final Report, Contract No. : MOM 7DNS-895942, GSI Technical Report No.80-012. Melbourne, Florida.
  17. Groger G. Kolbe TH, Czerwinski A, Nagel C. 2008. OGC City Geography Markup Language (CityGML) Reference number of this OGC®project document. OGC 08-007r1 Version: 1.0.0.
  18. Lehner H, Dorfne L. 2020. Digital geoTwin Vienna: Towards a Digital Twin City as Geodata Hub. P FG (2020) 88:63-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41064-020-00101-4.
  19. Wolf PR, Dewitt BA, Wilkinson BE. 2014. Elements of Phohogrammetry with applications in GIS, 4th ed. Mcgraw-Hill. p.87-90.