Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (대한간호학회지)

Korean Society of Nursing Science (한국간호과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of Learning Presence of Non-Face-to-Face Class Experience in Nursing Students on Academic Achievement: Mediating Effect of Learning Flow and Moderated Mediation of Digital Literacy

비대면 수업 경험 간호대학생의 학습실재감이 학업성취도에 미치는 영향: 학습몰입의 매개효과와 디지털 리터러시의 조절된 매개효과

  • Received : 2021.12.31
  • Accepted : 2022.05.16
  • Published : 2022.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the mediating effect of learning flow and the moderated mediation effect of digital literacy on the effect of the learning presence of non-face-to-face class experience in nursing students on academic achievement. Methods: Participants were 272 nursing students from six universities in two different cities. A self-report questionnaire was used to measure learning presence, learning flow, digital literacy, and academic achievement. Analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 and SPSS PROCESS Macro (4.0). Results: The mediating effect of learning flow on the effect of learning presence on academic achievement was 0.42, and the moderated mediation index of digital literacy was 0.17. Learning flow showed a mediating effect on the relationship between learning presence and academic achievement. Digital literacy had a moderated mediation effect on the relationship between learning presence and academic achievement that was mediated by learning flow. Conclusion: The intensity of the mediating effect of nursing students' learning presence on academic achievement through learning flow increases as the level of digital literacy increases. These results suggest that educational programs considering the level of learning presence, learning flow, and digital literacy are required to promote the academic achievement of nursing college students.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by 2021 Chonnam National University, College of Nursing Research Fund.

References

  1. Park SY, Joo MH, Lee DY. A study on the facilitating factors affecting learning achievement and satisfaction in synchronous online classes at colleges. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2021;21(11):779-792. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.11.779
  2. Koo B, Kim AR. The effect of instructional quality, teaching presence, and professor support on academic optimism and learning flow among undergraduate nursing students in an online distance education environment. Journal of the Korean Society for Wellness. 2021;16(3):141-148. https://doi.org/10.21097/ksw.2021.08.16.3.141
  3. Hodges CB, Fowler DJ. The COVID-19 crisis and faculty members in higher education: From emergency remote teaching to better teaching through reflection. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education. 2020;5(1):118-122. https://doi.org/10.32674/jimphe.v5i1.2507
  4. Kim HD, Kim JY. The structural relationship among digital information usage ability, social support, self directed learning ability, and learning immersion of early adult learners: Focusing on the untact learning environment. The Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education. 2021;33(2):492-503. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2021.4.33.2.492
  5. Do J. An investigation of design constraints in the process of converting face-to-face course into online course. Journal of Education & Culture. 2020;26(2):153-173. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2020.26.2.153
  6. Park SY, Shin HS. An analysis of the trends in studies related to contactless and remote class operations for the college students of nursing and health related major programs. The Journal of Korean Nursing Research. 2021;5(2):39-54. https://doi.org/10.34089/jknr.2021.5.2.39
  7. Park JH, Lee YS. The mediating effect of learning flow on relationship between presence, learning satisfaction and academic achievement in e-learning. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information. 2018;23(11):229-238. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2018.23.11.229
  8. Kim YM, Pak KH. The effects of learning presence on learning flow and learning performance in e-learning. The e-Business Studies. 2018;19(3):99-115. https://doi.org/10.20462/tebs.2018.6.19.3.99
  9. Kim UJ, Park JH. The relationships among learning presence, learning flow, and academic achievement at the cyber universities. Asian Journal of Education. 2012;13(3):143-170. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2012.13.4.007
  10. Im SH, Hong S. Effects of task value and presence on learning flow of nursing students in online learning environment. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2021;21(6):387-397. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.6.387
  11. Lee JG, Kim WJ, Lee JK. The relationship between learning motivation, learning commitment and academic achievement of nursing students who gave non-face-to-face online lectures. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. 2020;21(11):412-419. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2020.21.11.412
  12. Tang CM, Chaw LY. Digital literacy: A prerequisite for effective learning in a blended learning environment? Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 2016;14(1):54-65.
  13. Cho AY, Park IW, Ko YJ. Exploring the mediation effect of flow on the effects of digital literacy on satisfaction and achievement in smartpad based math classes. The Journal of Research in Education. 2019;32(4):163-189. https://doi.org/10.24299/kier.2019.32.4.163
  14. Terry J, Davies A, Williams C, Tait S, Condon L. Improving the digital literacy competence of nursing and midwifery students: A qualitative study of the experiences of NICE student champions. Nurse Education in Practice. 2019;34:192-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.11.016
  15. Lei H, Xiong Y, Chiu MM, Zhang J, Cai Z. The relationship between ICT literacy and academic achievement among students: A meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review. 2021;127:106123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106123
  16. Brown J, Morgan A, Mason J, Pope N, Bosco AM. Student nurses' digital literacy levels: Lessons for curricula. Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2020;38(9):451-458. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000615
  17. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 2nd ed. New York (NY): The Guilford Press; 2018. p. 1-112, 393-468.
  18. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 1st Engl. Ed. Lee HK, translator. Paju: Shinyoungsa; c2015. p. 1-486.
  19. Pak KH, Kim YM. The difference analysis of learning presence in online discussion learning based on e-learning. The e-Business Studies. 2019;20(5):95-109. https://doi.org/10.20462/tebs.2019.10.20.5.95
  20. Ary D, Jacobs LC, Razavieh A. Introduction to research in education. 6th ed. Belmont (CA): Wadsworth Thomson Learning; 2002. p. 1-582.
  21. Rovai AP, Wighting MJ, Baker JD, Grooms LD. Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings. The Internet and Higher Education. 2009;12(1):7-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.002
  22. Kim J, Kim HO, Lee M. Academic achievement of nursing college students according to academic self-efficacy: The mediating effect of major satisfaction. Child Health Nursing Research. 2019;25(2):205-213. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2019.25.2.205
  23. Wang L. The effect of communication behavior on learning performance in team learning activities using social media: Focusing on the mediating effect of digital literacy [master's thesis]. Seoul: Chung-Ang University; 2017. p. 1-72.
  24. Kim SH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Lee UJ, Park IJ, Kim ME, et al. Application of digital literacy in education curriculum. Daegu: Korea Education and Research Information Service (KERIS); 2017 Dec. Report No.: KR 2017-4.
  25. Park H, So HJ. Examining the relationships between learning presence and learning performance in distance lectures perceived by university students during COVID-19. The Journal of Educational Information and Media. 2021;27(1):253-280. https://doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.27.1.253
  26. Andel SA, de Vreede T, Spector PE, Padmanabhan B, Singh VK, de Vreede GJ. Do social features help in video-centric online learning platforms? A social presence perspective. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020;113:106505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106505
  27. Mo S. A comparison study of social presence by gender and interaction means in a college-level online learning environment. Korean Journal of General Education. 2021;15(1):287-302. https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2021.15.1.287
  28. Chae D, Kim H, Yoo JY, Lee J. Agreement on core components of an e-learning cultural competence program for public health workers in South Korea: A delphi study. Asian Nursing Research. 2019;13(3):184-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2019.04.005
  29. Parker SW, Hansen MA, Bernadowski C. COVID-19 campus closures in the United States: American student perceptions of forced transition to remote learning. Social Sciences. 2021;10(2):62. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10020062
  30. Kim H, Suh EE. The effects of an interactive nursing skills mobile application on nursing students' knowledge, self-efficacy, and skills performance: A randomized controlled trial. Asian Nursing Research. 2018;12(1):17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2018.01.001
  31. Nagle LM, Kleib M, Furlong K. Digital health in Canadian schools of nursing part A: Nurse educators' perspectives. Quality Advancement in Nursing Education - Avancees en Formation Infirmiere. 2020;6(1):4. https://doi.org/10.17483/2368-6669.1229