Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems (한국산업정보학회논문지)

Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems (한국산업정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Mediation Effect of Open Innovation Activity and Resilience in the Relationship between Preparation Competency for Industry-University Cooperation and Company Performance

산학협력준비역량과 기업성과 간의 관계에서 개방형혁신협업과 회복탄력성의 매개효과

  • Received : 2022.06.01
  • Accepted : 2022.06.24
  • Published : 2022.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, factors necessary for successful industry-university cooperation of SMEs(small and medium-sized enterprises) were identified. The structure of the TOE (Technology, Organization, Environment) framework was considered for a company's industry-university cooperation preparation capacity, and open innovation collaboration and resilience were utilized as a mediating effect between industry-university cooperation preparation capacity and corporate performance. This study verified the model through a structured questionnaire targeting 204 SMEs with industry-university cooperation experience. As a result, it was confirmed that it was important for companies to make diversified efforts by accommodating industry-university cooperation to obtain results from industry-university cooperation.

본 논문에서는 중소기업이 성공적인 산학협력을 위하여 필요한 요인을 확인하였다. 기업의 산학협력준비역량은 TOE(Technology, Organization, Environment) 구조의 구조를 고려하였으며, 산학협력준비역량과 기업성과 간의 매개효과로 개방형혁신협업과 회복탄력성을 활용하였다. 본 연구는 산학협력 경험이 있는 중소기업 204개를 대상으로 구조화된 설문을 통해 모형을 검증하였으며, 이를 통해 산학협력의 준비역량이 기업성과에 유의한 영향을 미치며 설정한 각 변수의 매개효과를 확인하였다. 결과적으로 산학협력으로 인한 성과를 얻기 위해서는 기업에서 산학협력을 수용하고자 하는 다각적인 노력 여부가 중요함을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. A. Arora and A. Gambardella. (1994). Evaluating technolological information and utilizing it. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization, 24(1), 91-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(94)90055-8
  2. Aboelmaged, M. G. (2014). Predicting e-readiness at firm-level: An analysis of technological, organizational and environmental (TOE) effects on e-maintenance readiness in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Information Management, 34(5), 639-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.05.002
  3. Ahuja, G., Lampert, C. M., and Tandon, V. (2008). Moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 1-98. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211446
  4. Arranz, N. and de Arroyabe, J. F. (2007). Governance structures in R&D networks: An analysis in the european context. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(5), 645-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.009
  5. Bantel, K. A. (1998). Technology-based, "adolescent" firm configurations: Strategy identification, context, and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(3), 205-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00033-5
  6. Belderbos, R., Carree, M. and Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33(10), 1477-1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003
  7. Boachie-Mensah, F. and Acquah, I. S. (2015). The effect of innovation types on the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in the Sekondi-Takoradi metropolis. Archives of Business Research, 3(3), 77-98.
  8. Burcharth, A. L., Knudsen, M. P. and Sondergaard, H. A. (2014). Neither invented nor shared here: The impact and management of attitudes for the adoption of open innovation practices. Technovation, 34(3), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.11.007
  9. Chesbrough, H. W. and Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
  10. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295-336.
  11. Cho, Byung-Kill and Kim, Sung-Hong. (2013). The impact of open innovation activities on new product development and business performance. Journal of the Korean Production and Operations Management Society, 24(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.21131/KOPOMS.24.1.201303.1
  12. Cho, Yeon-Sung. (2016). The Moderating Effects of External Environmental Turbulence toward the Path between the Open Innovation and Export Performance of Manufacturing SMEs. Korean Corporation Management Review, 23(3), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.21052/kcmr.2016.23.3.04
  13. Christopher, M. and Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090410700275
  14. Conway, G., Waage, J. and Delaney, S. (2010). Science and innovation for development. London: UK Collaborative on Development Sciences.
  15. Cooperations-Forcusedon Wonju High-Tech Medical Machinery and Tools Industry-. Ph. D. Thesis, The Graduate School of Sangji University, Kangwon. Korea.
  16. Cui Wei and Jung Jin-Sup. (2015). A Study on Relationships among Firm's Internal and External Factors, Open Innovation Activity and Open Innovation Performance. Korean Corporation Management Review, 22(6), 105-125.
  17. de Luca, L. M., and Atuahene-Gima, K. (2007). Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: Examining the different routes to product innovation performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.1.95
  18. Dedrick, J. and West, J. (2004). An exploratory study into open source platform adoption. IEEE, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
  19. Dyer, J. G. and McGuinness, T. M. (1996). Resilience: Analysis of the concept. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 10(5), 276-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9417(96)80036-7
  20. Eisenhardt, K. M. and Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136-150. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.2.136
  21. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  22. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L. and Holling, C. S. (2004). Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review in Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35(1), 557-581. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711
  23. Forrest, C. M. and Martin, M. J. C.(1989). Strategic Alliances between Large and Small Research Intensive Organization: Experiences in the Biotechnology Industry. R&D Management, 22(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1992.tb00787.x
  24. Gangwar, H., Date, H., and Ramaswamy, R. (2015). Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(1), 107-130. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2013-0065
  25. Gassmann, O. and Enkel. E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: Three core process archetypes. R&D Management Conference, Lisbon.
  26. Geisler, E. (1995). Industry-university technology cooperation: A theory of inter-organizational relationships. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 7(2), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329508524205
  27. Gemunden, H. G. and Heydebreck, P. (1995). The influence of business strategies on technological network activities. Research Policy, 24(6), 831-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00784-5
  28. Geroski, P. A., and Toker. S. (1996). The turnover of market leaders in UK manufacturing industry, 1979~1986. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(1), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(95)00479-3
  29. Gulati, R. (2010). Reorganize for resilience: Putting customers at the center of your business. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  30. Hagedoorn, J., and Schakenraad, J. (1994). The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15(4), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150404
  31. Haimes, Y. Y. (2006). On the definition of vulnerabilities in measuring risks to infrastructures. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 26(2), 293-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00755.x
  32. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  33. Hoffmann, W. H. (2007). Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 827-856. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.607
  34. Hong Eunyoung. (2017). A Study on the Effective Performance According to the Industry-University Relationship : Focusing on mediating effect of I-U barrier and moderating effects of university administration efforts and trust. Ph. D. Thesis, The Graduate School of Hanbat National University, Daejeon, Korea.
  35. Hong Kwan Soo and Cheong Ki Woong. (2004). The Impact of Environmental Clockspeed, Information Sharing, and Collaboration on Supply Chain Performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Samall Business, 26(2), 77-100.
  36. Hong Mee Keung. (2018). A Study of BSC Evaluation of a Local Government on the Final Achievement. Global Business Administration Review, 15(5), 113-133 https://doi.org/10.38115/asgba.2018.15.5.113
  37. Hong, Jang Pyo. (2005). The Effect of Technological Collaboration on the Innovation Performance of Small and Medium-sized Firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 27(3), 3-32.
  38. J. Y. Lee, C. Y. Kim & G. H. Choi. (2016). The effect of external R&D on the innovation efficiency : an empirical study of manufacturing industries in Korea. Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 39(4), 125-136. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2016.39.4.125
  39. Jang, Kwang-Soon and Kim, Yoon-Beom. (2010). The Effect of Innovation on Business Performances in Small and Medium Enterprises. Journal of Korea Safety Management & Science, 12(4), 239-246.
  40. Jeon, Dae Uk. (2013). Considering the Concept of Resilience toward Applying to System. Dynamics Approach. Korean System Dynamics Review. 14(2), 5-30.
  41. Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75-85.
  42. Kaufmann, A. and Todtling, F. (2002). How effective is innovation support for SMEs? An analysis of the region of upper Austria. Technovation, 22(3), 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00081-X
  43. Kim Bong Moon. (2013). Factors affecting the performance of industry-university cooperations. Ph. D. thesis, The Graduate School of Governance Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
  44. Kim Chang-Bong and Kwon, Seung-Ha. (2013). Effects of Supply Chain Risk Management from Partnership and Risk Management Performance in SCM of Korea. Korea Trade Review, 38(1), 91-112.
  45. Kim Dae-Hui and JongKeun Kim (2017). The Effects of R&D Capability and Market Orientation on Product Innovation Performance : The Moderating Role of Technological Innovation Orientation. Journal of the Korea Society Industrial Information Systems Research, 22(4), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2017.22.2.079
  46. Kim Gye Soo. (2013). Easy SEM with smartPLS. Seoul : CHUNGRAM.
  47. Kim young joe. (2005). The Effect of Technological Collaborations on the Innovation Out puts and Corporate Financial Performance in Small and Medium-size Firms of Busan City. Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 27(3), 123-154.
  48. Kim, Y., Song, K. and Lee, J. (1993). Determinants of technological innovation in the small firms of Korea. R&D Management, 23(3), 215-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1993.tb00824.x
  49. Ko, Tae-Hyung and Kim, Young-Taek. (2012). A Study on Adoption and Performance Analysis in Korea SMEs through Integrate IT Acceptance Model. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 25(5), 2509-2529.
  50. Kurokawa, S. (1997). Make-or-buy decisions in R&D: Small technology based firms in the United States and Japan. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(2), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.584921
  51. Kwon, Jae-Deuk and Lee, Jin-Choon. (2017). A study on determinants of resilience of firms. Journal of Decision Science, 25(2), 1-24.
  52. Lee Eung seog. (2018). Entrepreneurial Orientation, External Oriented Organizational Culture, Open Innovation, and Firm Performance among Korean Manufacturing SMEs. Ph. D. Thesis, The Graduate School of Korea University of Technology Education, Chungcheongnam, Korea.
  53. Lee Hyun-Wang. (2008). A Study on the Determinants of Performance inIndustry-Academy. Ph. D. Thesis, The Graduate School of Sangji University, Kangwon, Korea.
  54. Lee, Sunwoo and Lee, Heesang. (2004). A Study on an Integrative Model for Big Data System Adoption : Based on TOE, DOI and UTAUT. Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, 21(4), 463-483.
  55. Lee, Young Ho and Chae, Myung Sin. (2006). An Empirical Study on the Factors Affecting the Adoption of Enterprise Architecture based on the TOE Framework. Korean Management Science Review, 23(2), 17-39.
  56. Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2011.63886531
  57. Link, A. N. and Bauer, L. L. (1989). Cooperative research in US. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
  58. March, J. G. and Sutton, R. I. (1997). Crossroads-organizational performance as a dependent variable. Organization Science, 8(6), 698-706. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.6.698
  59. McManus, J. W. and Polsenberg, J. F. (2004). Coral-algal phase shifts on coral reefs: Ecological and environmental aspects. Progress in Oceanography, 60(2-4), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2004.02.014
  60. Milliken, F. J. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1987.4306502
  61. Min Hyun-Ku, Kim Tai-Young and Hwang Seung-June. (2012). Open Innovation R&D Efficiency Evaluation by Integrated AHP-DEA. Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 35(4), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2012.35.4.149
  62. Park Chulsoon. (2012). Open Innovation in Korean Small and Medium Enterprises: Moderating Role of Satisfaction of Innovation Partners and Corporate Life Cycle. Journal of the Korean Production and Operations Management Society, 23(3), 231-254. https://doi.org/10.21131/KOPOMS.23.3.201209.231
  63. Park, Song Kun and Kim, Byung Keun . (2014). The effect of incoming knowledge spillover, technological collaborations, and appropriability mechanismsontheInnovation performance of SMEs: moderating effect of patent. Korean management review, 43(1), 95-120.
  64. Pettit, T. J. (2008). Supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework, an assessment tool and an implementation process. Published Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  65. Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.
  66. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988
  67. Roh Doo-Hwan, Hwang, Kyung-Ho and Park Ho-Young. (2017).The impact of open innovation activities on performance of Korean IT SMEs.Venture : Technology Transfer Experiences and Technological Collaborations. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.12.1.201702.33
  68. Scholten, K. and Schilder, S. (2015). The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 471-484. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2014-0386
  69. Sang-Shik Lee (2015). An Empirical Study of Agile Manufacturing and its Business Performance: Focusing on Antecedents of Agility. Journal of the Korea Society Industrial Information Systems Research, 20(1), 103-112.
  70. Seo Yong-Mo and Hyun Byung-Hwan. (2019). A study on The Organizational Characteristics of SMEs on Market Performance through the Acceptance of Open Innovation -Focused on Woman's SMEs-. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(11), 131-141.
  71. Seo, Yong Mo. (2020). A Study on the Effect of SEMs Characteristic Factors on Corporate Performances - Focused on the mediating effects of Open Innovation -. Ph. D. Thesis, The Graduate School of Daejeon University, Daejeon, Korea.
  72. Sisodiya, S. R., Johnson, J. L., and Gregoire, Y. (2013). Inbound open innovation for enhanced performance: Enablers and opportunities. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(5), 836-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.02.018
  73. Song, Geon-Ho. (2010). Impact of Technology Commercialization through Academia-Industrial Cooperation on the Performance of SME & Venture Enterprises. Ph. D. Thesis, The Graduate School of Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
  74. Stafford, E. R. (1994). Using co-operative strategies to make alliances work. Long Range Planning, 27(3), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(94)90191-0
  75. Sun Jonghak and Seung Woon Kim, (2019). A study on the antecedents and performances of technological innovation in small-medium ventures. Journal of the Korea Society Industrial Information Systems Research, 24(6), 67-79.
  76. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M. and Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
  77. Tidd, J., Bessant, J. and Pavitt, K. (2001). Innovation management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  78. Tornatzky, L. and Fleischer, M. (1990). The process of technology innovation. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
  79. Tsai, K. H. and Wang, J. C. (2009). External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese technological innovation survey. Research Policy, 38(3), 518-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.007
  80. Vanhaverbeke, W., van de Vrande, V. and Chesbrough, H. (2008). Understanding the advantages of open innovation practices in corporate venturing in terms of real options. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(4), 251-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00499.x
  81. Waddock, S. A. (1991). A typology of social partnership organizations. Administration & Society, 22(4), 480-515. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979102200405
  82. Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R. and Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social- ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5, from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/.
  83. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G., and Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
  84. Wilcox, D. T., Richards, F. and O'Keeffe, Z. C. (2004). Resilience and risk factors associated with experiencing childhood sexual abuse. Journal of the British Association for the Study and Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect, 13(5), 338-352.
  85. Wilson, B., and Henseler, J. (2007). Modeling reflective higher-order constructs using three approaches with PLS path modeling: A monte carlo comparison. Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, Otago, Australia.
  86. Won, In Seong. (2007). Factors Influencing Firm Performances in Group-Based Incentive Programs. Journal of Human Resource Management Research., 14(4), 34-47.
  87. Yoon, Byungun and Lee, Sungjoo. (2010). Open Innovation Models in SMEs. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 13(1), 160-183.
  88. Yun Jong-Weon. (2005). Study on Impact of SCM-BSC Implementation Degree on Performance Measurement System and Corporate Performance. Ph. D. Thesis, The Graduate School of Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.