DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Public Diplomacy, Propaganda, or What? China's Communication Practices in the South China Sea Dispute on Twitter

  • Nip, Joyce Y.M. (University of Sydney) ;
  • Sun, Chao (Sydney Informatics Hub, University of Sydney)
  • Received : 2021.08.01
  • Accepted : 2022.02.05
  • Published : 2022.06.30

Abstract

Multiple modes of communication on social media can contribute to public diplomacy in informing, conversing, and networking with members of foreign publics. However, manipulative behaviours on social media, prevalent especially in high tension contexts, create disruptions to authentic communication in what could be grey/black propaganda or information warfare. This study reviews existing literature about models of public diplomacy to guide an empirical study of China's communication in the #SouthChinaSea conversation on Twitter. It uses computational methods to identify, record, and analyze one-way, two-way, and network communication of China's actors. It employs manual qualitative research to determine the nature of China's actors. On that basis, it assesses China's Twitter communication in the issue against various models of public diplomacy.

Keywords

References

  1. Andi, S. (2021). How and why do consumers access news on social media? In N. Newman, R. Fletcher, A. Schulz, S. Andi, C. T. Robertson, & R. K. Nielsen (Eds.), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021, 10th edition. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2021/how-and-why-do-consumers-access-news-social-media
  2. Arceneaux, P. (2021). Information Intervention: A Taxonomy & Typology for Government Communication. Journal of Public Diplomacy, 1(1), 5-35. https://doi.org/10.23045/JPD.2021.1.1.005
  3. Ayhan, K. J. (2019). The boundaries of public diplomacy and non-state actors: a taxonomy of perspectives. International Studies Perspectives, 20(1), 63-83. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/eky010
  4. Bjola, C., & Holmes, M. (2015). Digital diplomacy: Theory and practice. Routledge.
  5. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10). doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
  6. Boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter.
  7. Brown, J. (2003). Anti-Propaganda Tradition in the United States. Bulletin Board for Peace. http://www.publicdiplomacy.org/19.htm
  8. Brown, R. (2013). The politics of relational public diplomacy. In R.S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault, & A. Fisher (Eds.), Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy (pp. 44-55): Routledge.
  9. Bruns, A. (2018). Gatewatching and news curation: Journalism, social media, and the public sphere. Peter Lang.
  10. Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2017). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Social Media (pp. 233-253). Sage.
  11. Castells, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture (Vol. 1.) The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  12. Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1(1), 29.
  13. Comor, E., & Bean, H. (2012). America's 'engagement'delusion: Critiquing a public diplomacy consensus. International Communication Gazette, 74(3), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048511432603
  14. Confessore, N., Dance, G. J. X., Harris, R., & Hansen, M. (2018, January 27). The follower factory. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/01/27/technology/social-media-bots.html.
  15. Cowan, G., & Arsenault, A. (2008). Moving from monologue to dialogue to collaboration: The three layers of public diplomacy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 10-30. doi:10.1177/0002716207311863
  16. Cull, N. J. (2008a). The cold war and the United States information agency: American propaganda and public diplomacy, 1945-1989. Naval War College Review, 62(2), 14.
  17. Cull, N. J. (2008b). Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311952
  18. Cull, N. J. (2013). The long road to public diplomacy 2.0: The Internet in US public diplomacy. International Studies Review, 15(1), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12026
  19. Cull, N. J. (2020). Public diplomacy before Gullion: The evolution of a phrase. In N. Snow & N. Cull (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (pp. 13-17). Routledge.
  20. d'Hooghe, I. (2005). Public diplomacy in the People's Republic of China. In J. Melissen (Ed.), The new public diplomacy (pp. 88-105). Springer.
  21. Di Martino, L. (2020). The spectrum of listening. In N. Snow & N. Cull (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (pp. 21-29). Routledge.
  22. Fellows, E. W. (1959). "Propaganda": History of a Word. American Speech, 34(3), 182-189. https://doi.org/10.2307/454039
  23. Fisher, A. (2013). Collaborative public diplomacy: How transnational networks influenced American studies in Europe: Springer.
  24. Fitzpatrick, K. (2007). Advancing the new public diplomacy: A public relations perspective. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2(3), 187-211. https://doi.org/10.1163/187119007X240497
  25. Garson, J. (2021, May 21). Announcing Twitter API v2 Likes lookup and blocks lookup. https://twittercommunity.com/t/announcing-twitter-api-v2-likes-lookup-and-blocks-lookup/154353
  26. Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55-77. doi:10.1177/0002716207312142
  27. Gleicher, N. (2020, September 22). Removing coordinated inauthentic behavior. Facebook. https://about.fb.com/news/2020/09/removing-coordinated-inauthentic-behavior-china-philippines/
  28. Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (1992). Models of public relations and communication. Excellence in public relations and communication management, 1992, 285-325.
  29. Guo, L., Mays, K., & Wang, J. (2019). Whose Story Wins on Twitter? Visualizing the South China Sea dispute. Journalism Studies, 20(4), 563-584. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2017.1399813
  30. Hartig, F. (2015). Chinese public diplomacy: The rise of the Confucius Institute: Routledge.
  31. Hartig, F. (2016). How China understands public diplomacy: The importance of national image for national interests. International Studies Review, 18(4), 655-680. doi:10.1093/isr/viw007
  32. Hocking, B. (2005). Rethinking the 'New' Public Diplomacy. In J. Melissen (Ed.), The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations (pp. 28-43). Palgrave Macmillan.
  33. Huang, Z., & Wang, R. (2019). Building a Network to "Tell China Stories Well": Chinese diplomatic communication strategies on Twitter. International Journal of Communication, 13(0), 2984-3007.
  34. Huang, Z. A., & Wang, R. (2020). 'Panda engagement' in China's digital public diplomacy. Asian Journal of Communication, 30(2), 118-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2020.1725075
  35. Huang, Z. A., & Wang, R. (2021). Exploring China's digitalization of public diplomacy on Weibo and Twitter: A case study of the US-China trade war. International Journal of Communication, 15, 28.
  36. Huijgh E. (2016). Public diplomacy. In C. M. Constantinou, P. Kerr, & P. Sharp, P. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy. Sage.
  37. Ji, S. (2021, January 1). Wolf Warriors in the West: how China's diplomats are taking to Twitter. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3116038/wolf-warriors-west-how-chinas-diplomats-are-taking-twitter
  38. Jia, R., & Li, W. (2020). Public diplomacy networks: China's public diplomacy communication practices in twitter during Two Sessions. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 101818-undefined. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101818
  39. Jowett, G. S., & O'Donnell, V. (2011). Propaganda & persuasion (5th ed). Sage.
  40. Kampf, R., Manor, I., & Segev, E. (2015). Digital diplomacy 2.0? A cross-national comparison of public engagement in Facebook and Twitter. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 10(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341318
  41. Keith, R. C. (1989). Diplomacy of Zhou Enlai: Springer.
  42. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010, April). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 591-600).
  43. Kinetz, E. (2021, May 29). Armies of fake fans boosts China's messaging on twitter. AP. https://apnews.com/article/asia-pacific-china-europe-middle-east-government-and-politics-62b13895aa6665ae4d887dcc8d196dfc
  44. King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2017). How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. American Political Science Review, 111(3), 484-501. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055417000144
  45. Lai, H., & Lu, Y. (2012). China's soft power and international relations (Vol. 23): Routledge.
  46. Lasswell, H. D. (1971). Propaganda technique in world war I (Vol. 170): MIT press.
  47. Leonard, M., Stead, C., & Smewing, C. (2002). Public diplomacy. Foreign Policy Centre.
  48. Li, Z. (2009). Differentiating concepts related to public diplomacy (Gong gong wai jiao xiang guan gai nian bian xi). Diplomacy Commentary (Wai jiao ping lun), 2, 57-66.
  49. Manor, I. (2019). The digitalization of public diplomacy. Springer.
  50. Meier, F., Elsweiler, D. C., & Wilson, M. L. (2014, June 1-4). More than liking and bookmarking? Towards understanding Twitter favouriting behaviour. [Paper presentation]. Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. https://www.aaai.org/Library/ICWSM/icwsm14contents.php
  51. Melissen, J. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice. In J. Melissen (Ed.), The new public diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. (pp. 3-27). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  52. Metaxas, P., Mustafaraj, E., Wong, K., Zeng, L., O'Keefe, M., & Finn, S. (2015). What do retweets indicate? Results from user survey and meta-review of research. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 9(1), 658-661. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14661
  53. Mueller, R. S. III (2019, March). Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election, Vol. 1. The U.S Department of Justice. https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf
  54. Napoli, P. M. (2011). Audience Evolution: New Technologies and the Transformation of Media Audiences. Columbia University Press.
  55. Nip, J. Y. M., Sun, C. (2018). China's news media tweeting, competing with US sources. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 13(1), 98-122. https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.292
  56. Pamment, J. (2013). New public diplomacy in the 21st century: A comparative study of policy and practice. Routledge.
  57. Pamment, J. (2015). Media influence, ontological transformation, and social change: Conceptual overlaps between development communication and public diplomacy. Communication Theory, 25(2), 188-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12064
  58. Pamment, J. (2018). Public diplomacy. The encyclopedia of diplomacy, 1-12.
  59. Potter, E. (2003). Canada and the new public diplomacy. International Journal, 58(1), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.2307/40203812
  60. Powers, S., & Kounalakis, M. (Eds.). (2017). Can public diplomacy survive the internet? Bots, echo chambers, and disinformation. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/2017-ACPD-Internet.pdf
  61. Ratliff, W. E. (1969). Chinese communist cultural diplomacy toward Latin America, 1949-1960. Hispanic American Historical Review, 49(1), 53-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/2511316
  62. Ratliff, W. E. (1972). Communist China and Latin America, 1949-1972. Asian Survey, 12(10), 846-863. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.1972.12.10.01p0265z
  63. Sevin, E., & Ingenhoff, D. (2018). Public diplomacy on social media: Analyzing networks and content. International Journal of Communication, 12, 23.
  64. Shambaugh, D. L. (2013). China goes global: The partial power (Vol. 111): Oxford University Press Oxford.
  65. Song, S., Faris, R. M., & Kelly, J. (2015). Beyond the Wall: Mapping Twitter in China. Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2015-14. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2685358
  66. Stewart, L. G., Arif, A., Nied, A. C., Spiro, E. S., & Starbird, K. (2017). Drawing the lines of contention: Networked frame contests within# BlackLivesMatter discourse. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(CSCW), 1-23.
  67. Stockmann, D. (2013). Media commercialization and authoritarian rule in China. Cambridge University Press.
  68. Twitter Safety (2019, September 20). Disclosing new data to our archive of information operations. https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2019/info-ops-disclosure-data-september-2019
  69. Wang, Z. (2019). "We are all Diba members tonight": Cyber-nationalism as emotional and playful actions online. In H. Liu (Ed.). From Cyber-Nationalism to Fandom Nationalism (pp. 53-71). Routledge.
  70. Yang, J. (2011). Make effort to develop the new situation of public diplomacy with Chinese characteristics (Nu li kai tuo zhong guo te se gong gong wai jiao xin ju mian). Qiushi, 4, 43-46.
  71. Yang, J. (2013). The origin, challenges, and strategies of China's public diplomacy (Zhong guo gong gong wai jiao de yuan qi tiao zhan he dui ce). Diplomacy Quarterly (Wai jiao ji kan), 15, 39-43.
  72. Zaharna, R. S. (2008). Mapping out a spectrum of public diplomacy initiatives: Information and relational communication frameworks. In N. Snow & P. Taylor (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, (1st ed., pp. 106-120). Routledge.
  73. Zaharna, R. S. (2013). Network purpose, network design: Dimensions of network and collaborative public diplomacy. In R.S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault, & A. Fisher (Eds.), Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy (pp. 187-205). Routledge.
  74. Zhao, K. (2019). The China model of public diplomacy and its future. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(1-2), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-14101033
  75. Zhuang, L. (2020). The gap between China's people-to-people exchange policy and its aim to promote understanding among peoples in the world. In L.T. Lee (Ed.). Chinese People's Diplomacy and Developmental Relations with East Asia (pp. 10-29). Routledge.