The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제14권3호
  • /
  • Pages.133-142
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Marginal bone level change during sequential loading periods of partial edentulous rehabilitation using immediately loaded self-tapping implants: a 6.5-year retrospective study

  • Wang, Jing (Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology) ;
  • Zhang, Zhengchuan (Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology) ;
  • Deng, Feilong (Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology)
  • 투고 : 2021.12.27
  • 심사 : 2022.05.24
  • 발행 : 2022.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. A large number of studies have suggested the practicability and predictability of immediate implant function, but few studies have reported marginal bone level changes during sequential loading periods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal bone remodeling of immediately loaded self-tapping implants both at each time point and during each loading period between two time points. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The patients included in this retrospective study were treated with immediately loaded NobelSpeedy Replace implants between August 2008 and July 2009. Differences in the marginal bone level (MBL) at each time point and the marginal bone level change (ΔMBL) between two time points were analyzed with Bonferroni correction (P < .05). RESULTS. Overall, 24 patients (mean age, 47.3 ± 12.8 years) with 42 immediately loaded implants and a median follow-up of 6.5 years (IQR, 67.8 months) were included. The cumulative survival rate after 10 - 12 years was 95.2%. Continuous but slow marginal bone loss was observed during long-term follow-up. MBL at both 7.5 years and 11 years was significantly lower than that at loading, 6 months, 2 years and 4 years (P < .05). No bone loss difference was found in any period before 4 years of follow up (P > .05). The loading period of 4 years to 7.5 years showed the largest ΔMBL compared to those of other time periods (P < .05). CONCLUSION. Slight bone loss occurred continuously, and more radical changes of marginal bone can be observed during the period of 4-7.5 years. Thus, long-term effective follow-up of immediately loaded implants is needed.

키워드

과제정보

The authors wish to thank all of the research staff members at the Department of Oral Implantology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University.

참고문헌

  1. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100.
  2. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Chrcanovic B. Longterm clinical outcome of implants with different surface modifications. Eur J Oral Implantol 2018;11:S123-36.
  3. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
  4. Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. A retrospective study on clinical and radiological outcomes of oral implants in patients followed up for a minimum of 20 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018;20:199-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12571
  5. Coli P, Jemt T. On marginal bone level changes around dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2021;23:159-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12970
  6. Chen J, Cai M, Yang J, Aldhohrah T, Wang Y. Immediate versus early or conventional loading dental implants with fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. J Prosthet Dent 2019;122:516-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.013
  7. Cannizzaro G, Leone M, Consolo U, Ferri V, Esposito M. Immediate functional loading of implants placed with flapless surgery versus conventional implants in partially edentulous patients: a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:867-75.
  8. Galli F, Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Testori T, Esposito M. Immediate non-occlusal vs. early loading of dental implants in partially edentulous patients: a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Peri-implant bone and soft-tissue levels. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:546-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01530.x
  9. Trbakovic A, Toljanic JA, Kumar VV, Thor A. Eight to eleven-year follow-up of immediately loaded implants placed in edentulous maxillae with compromised bone volume and poor bone quality: A prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2020;22:69-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12874
  10. Rai S, Rai A, Kumar T, Kumari M, Somanna MK, Bandgar S. Immediately loaded single unit dental implants: a clinical study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2020;12:S245-53.
  11. Amato F, Polara G, Spedicato GA. Immediate loading of fixed partial dental prostheses on extra-short and short implants in patients with severe atrophy of the posterior maxilla or mandible: an up-to-4-year clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2020;35:607-15. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7943
  12. Del Giudice R, Piattelli A, Grande NM, Cataneo E, Crispino A, Petrini M. Implant insertion torque value in immediate loading: a retrospective study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2019;24:e398-403.
  13. Bavetta G, Bavetta G, Randazzo V, Cavataio A, Paderni C, Grassia V, Dipalma G, Gargiulo Isacco C, Scarano A, De Vito D, Cantore S, Ballini A, Inchingolo F. A retrospective study on insertion torque and implant stability quotient (ISQ) as stability parameters for immediate loading of implants in fresh extraction sockets. Biomed Res Int 2019;2019:9720419.
  14. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21:4-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12742
  15. Jungner M, Lundqvist P, Lundgren S. A retrospective comparison of oxidized and turned implants with respect to implant survival, marginal bone level and peri-implant soft tissue conditions after at least 5 years in function. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:230-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00473.x
  16. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Gravito I. Complete edentulous rehabilitation using an immediate function protocol and an implant design featuring a straight body, anodically oxidized surface, and narrow tip with engaging threads extending to the apex of the implant: a 5-year retrospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:153-61. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4123
  17. Malo P, Nobre Mde A, Petersson U, Wigren S. A pilot study of complete edentulous rehabilitation with immediate function using a new implant design: case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8:223-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00024.x
  18. Agliardi EL, Pozzi A, Stappert CF, Benzi R, Romeo D, Gherlone E. Immediate fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla: a prospective clinical and radiological study after 3 years of loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:292-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00482.x
  19. Coutant JC, Seguela V, Hauret L, Caix P, Ella B. Assessment of the correlation between implant stability and bone density by computed tomography and resonance frequency analysis in fresh cadavers. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:1264-70. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2607
  20. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Moss S. Posterior maxillary implants inserted with bicortical anchorage and placed in immediate function for partial or complete edentulous rehabilitations. A retrospective clinical study with a median follow-up of 7 years. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;19:19-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-014-0444-7
  21. Puterman I, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Oyama K, Morimoto T, Lozada J. Biological adaptation to misfits of immediately loaded fixed prostheses following computer-guided surgery. J Prosthodont 2012;21:185-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00814.x
  22. Lombardi T, Berton F, Salgarello S, Barbalonga E, Rapani A, Piovesana F, Gregorio C, Barbati G, Di Lenarda R, Stacchi C. Factors influencing early marginal bone loss around dental implants positioned subcrestally: a multicenter prospective clinical study. J Clin Med 2019;8:1168. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8081168
  23. Rattanapanich P, Aunmeungtong W, Chaijareenont P, Khongkhunthian P. Comparative study between an immediate loading protocol using the digital workflow and a conventional protocol for dental implant treatment: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Med 2019;8:622. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8050622
  24. Zhu Y, Zheng X, Zeng G, Xu Y, Qu X, Zhu M, Lu E. Clinical efficacy of early loading versus conventional loading of dental implants. Sci Rep 2015;5:15995. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15995
  25. Bambini F, Orilisi G, Quaranta A, Meme L. Biological oriented immediate loading: a new mathematical implant vertical insertion protocol, five-year follow-up study. Materials (Basel) 2021;14:387. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020387
  26. Lemos BF, Lopez-Jarana P, Falcao C, Rios-Carrasco B, Gil J, Rios-Santos JV, Herrero-Climent M. Effects of different undersizing site preparations on implant stability. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:8965. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238965
  27. Planinic D, Dubravica I, Sarac Z, Poljak-Guberina R, Celebic A, Bago I, Cabov T, Peric B. Comparison of different surgical procedures on the stability of dental implants in posterior maxilla: A randomized clinical study. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021;122:487-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2020.08.004
  28. Vogl S, Stopper M, Hof M, Theisen K, Wegscheider WA, Lorenzoni M. Immediate occlusal vs nonocclusal loading of implants: A randomized prospective clinical pilot study and patient centered outcome after 36months. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21:766-774.
  29. Brunski JB. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:99-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374990130012301
  30. Ericsson I, Nilson H, Lindh T, Nilner K, Randow K. Immediate functional loading of Branemark single tooth implants. An 18 months' clinical pilot follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:26-33. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001026.x
  31. Rao W, Benzi R. Single mandibular first molar implants with flapless guided surgery and immediate function: preliminary clinical and radiographic results of a prospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:S3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60003-1
  32. Donati M, La Scala V, Billi M, Di Dino B, Torrisi P, Berglundh T. Immediate functional loading of implants in single tooth replacement: a prospective clinical multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:740-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01552.x
  33. Benic GI, Mir-Mari J, Hammerle CH. Loading protocols for single-implant crowns: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:222-38. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g4.1
  34. Brizuela-Velasco A, Chavarri-Prado D. The functional loading of implants increases their stability: A retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21:122-9.
  35. Guncu MB, Aslan Y, Tumer C, Guncu GN, Uysal S. In-patient comparison of immediate and conventional loaded implants in mandibular molar sites within 12 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:335-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01471.x
  36. Becker W, Hujoel P, Becker BE, Wohrle P. Survival rates and bone level changes around porous oxide-coated implants (TiUniteTM). Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013;15:654-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12106
  37. Monje A, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Garcia-Nogales A, Fu JH, Wang HL. A systematic review on marginal bone loss around short dental implants (<10 mm) for implant-supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1119-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12236
  38. Urdaneta RA, Leary J, Panetta KM, Chuang SK. The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single-tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:e179-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12087
  39. Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. 10-year follow-up of immediately loaded implants with TiUnite porous anodized surface. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:828-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00446.x
  40. Andersen E, Haanaes HR, Knutsen BM. Immediate loading of single-tooth ITI implants in the anterior maxilla: a prospective 5-year pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:281-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130307.x
  41. Donati M, La Scala V, Di Raimondo R, Speroni S, Testi M, Berglundh T. Marginal bone preservation in single-tooth replacement: a 5-year prospective clinical multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:425-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12117
  42. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lindhe J. Bone reactions to longstanding functional load at implants: an experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:925-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00747.x
  43. Cooper L, Felton DA, Kugelberg CF, Ellner S, Chaffee N, Molina AL, Moriarty JD, Paquette D, Palmqvist U. A multicenter 12-month evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:182-92.
  44. Albrektsson T, Buser D, Sennerby L. Crestal bone loss and oral implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:783-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12013
  45. Mura P. Immediate placement of tapered implants with a moderately rough anodized surface and smooth collar in fresh extraction sockets: A retrospective analysis with 10-year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019;21:272-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12722