DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Current strategies for aesthetic soft tissue refinement in nasal reconstruction

  • Kim, Min Ji (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Hyoseob (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Dong Ha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2022.05.31
  • Accepted : 2022.06.18
  • Published : 2022.06.20

Abstract

The challenges of successful nasal reconstruction, which are related to the anatomical complexity of the region, have been extensively studied. Revisional operations are often required to achieve proper nasal reconstruction, with results resembling the premorbid nasal status. This is necessary to ensure the quality of life of skin cancer patients. Fundamental nasal reconstruction requires both proper soft tissue coverage and proper function. However, earlier studies in the field primarily focused on the functional aspect of nose reconstruction, although the cosmetic aspect is also an important factor to consider. In response to this need, many recent studies on nose reconstruction have proposed various refinement strategies to improve aesthetic satisfaction. Most plastic surgeons accept the nasal aesthetic subunit principle as a standard for nasal reconstruction. This review outlines the commonly used surgical refinement options and management strategies for postoperative complications based on the subunit principle. In patients with nasal defects, a proper technical strategy might help minimize revision operations and optimize the long-term results.

Keywords

References

  1. van Lee CB, Roorda BM, Wakkee M, Voorham Q, Mooyaart AL, de Vijlder HC, et al. Recurrence rates of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after Mohs micrographic surgery vs. standard excision: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Dermatol 2019;181:338-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17188
  2. Menick FJ. Principles and planning in nasal and facial reconstruction: making a normal face. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:1033e-1047e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002237
  3. Menick FJ. Nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:138e-150e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d0ae2b
  4. Singh DJ, Bartlett SP. Aesthetic considerations in nasal reconstruction and the role of modified nasal subunits. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:639-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000041602.85239.93
  5. Burget GC, Menick FJ. The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;76:239-47. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198508000-00010
  6. Rohrich RJ, Griffin JR, Ansari M, Beran SJ, Potter JK. Nasal reconstruction: beyond aesthetic subunits: a 15-year review of 1334 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1405-19. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000138596.57393.05
  7. Kim MJ, Choi JW. Total nasal reconstruction with a forehead flap: focusing on the facial aesthetic subunit principle. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021;74:1824-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.023
  8. Thornton JF, Griffin JR, Constantine FC. Nasal reconstruction: an overview and nuances. Semin Plast Surg 2008;22:257-68. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1095885
  9. Lunatschek C, Schwipper V, Scheithauer M. Soft tissue reconstruction of the nose. Facial Plast Surg 2011;27:249-57. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1275774
  10. Steiger JD. Bilobed flaps in nasal reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011;19:107-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2010.10.013
  11. Okland TS, Lee YJ, Sanan A, Most SP. The bilobe flap for nasal reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg 2020;36:276-80. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1712160
  12. Borsuk DE, Papanastasiou C, Chollet A. Fine details that improve nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;148:634e-644e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008391
  13. Konofaos P, Alvarez S, McKinnie JE, Wallace RD. Nasal reconstruction: a simplified approach based on 419 operated cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2015;39:91-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0417-0
  14. Rezaeian F, Corsten M, Haack S, Gubisch WM, Fischer H. Nasal reconstruction: extending the limits. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016;4:e804. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000000801
  15. Ugur MB, Savranlar A, Uzun L, Kucuker H, Cinar F. A reliable surface landmark for localizing supratrochlear artery: medial canthus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:162-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2007.11.005
  16. Burget GC, Walton RL; Traduction francaise: B. Mole. Complete aesthetic reconstruction of nose and adjacent facial units with optimized use of free flaps, cartilaginous grafts and forehead flap combinations. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2009;54:497-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2009.01.036
  17. Fisher GH. Reconstruction of a full thickness soft triangle defect. Dermatol Surg 2009;35:2009-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01324.x
  18. Moolenburgh SE, McLennan L, Levendag PC, Munte K, Scholtemeijer M, Hofer SO, et al. Nasal reconstruction after malignant tumor resection: an algorithm for treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:97-105.
  19. Parrett BM, Pribaz JJ. An algorithm for treatment of nasal defects. Clin Plast Surg 2009;36:407-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2009.02.004
  20. Fischer H. Nasal reconstruction with the paramedian forehead flap: details for success. Facial Plast Surg 2014;30:318-31. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1376918
  21. Menick FJ. Practical details of nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131:613e-630e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182827bb3
  22. Correa BJ, Weathers WM, Wolfswinkel EM, Thornton JF. The forehead flap: the gold standard of nasal soft tissue reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2013;27:96-103. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1351231
  23. Menick FJ. Nasal reconstruction: art and practice. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008.
  24. Fishman Z, Whyne CM, Fialkov JA. Forehead flap templates for nasal reconstruction digitally developed from 2D and 3D images. J Craniofac Surg 2022;33:e78-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008023
  25. Murrell GL, Burget GC. Aesthetically precise templates for nasal reconstruction using a new material. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:1855-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000091241.85268.DD
  26. Menick FJ. Nasal reconstruction with a forehead flap. Clin Plast Surg 2009;36:443-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2009.02.015
  27. Lee LN, Smith DF, Boahene KD, Byrne PJ. Intraoperative laser-assisted indocyanine green imaging for objective measurement of the vascular delay technique in locoregional head and neck flaps. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2014;16:343-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2014.106
  28. Woodard CR, Most SP. Intraoperative angiography using laser-assisted indocyanine green imaging to map perfusion of forehead flaps. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2012;14:263-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.2011.1540
  29. Yarborough JM Jr. Ablation of facial scars by programmed dermabrasion. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1988;14:292-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1988.tb03503.x
  30. Little SC, Hughley BB, Park SS. Complications with forehead flaps in nasal reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2009;119:1093-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20243
  31. Thornton JF, Weathers WM. Nasolabial flap for nasal tip reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;122:775-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318182370b
  32. Weber SM, Baker SR. Management of cutaneous nasal defects. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2009;17:395-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2009.05.005
  33. Zitelli JA. Wound healing by secondary intention: a cosmetic appraisal. J Am Acad Dermatol 1983;9:407-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(83)70150-7