References
- Barros, C., Moya-Gomez, B., and Garcia-Palomares, J.C. (2019). Identifying temporal patterns of visitors to national parks through geotagged photographs. Sustainability, 11, 6983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246983
- Chan, K.M., Goldstein, J., Satterfield, T., Hannahs, N., Kikiloi, K., Naidoo, R., et al. (2011). Cultural services and non-use values. In P. Kareiva, H. Tallis, T.H. Ricketts, G.C. Daily, and S., Polasky (Eds.), Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services (pp. 206-228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Daniel, T.C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J.W., Chan, K.M., et al. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 8812-8819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114773109
- Do, Y., and Kim, J.Y. (2020). An assessment of the aesthetic value of protected wetlands based on a photo content and its metadata. Ecological Engineering, 150, 105816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105816
- Do, Y., Kim, J.Y., Lineman, M., Kim, D.K., and Joo, G.J. (2015a). Using Internet search behavior to assess public awareness of protected wetlands. Conservation Biology, 29, 271-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12419
- Do, Y., Kim, S.B., Kim, J.Y., and Joo, G.J. (2015b). Wetland-based tourism in South Korea: who, when, and why. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 23, 779-787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-015-9418-2
- Dobbie, M.F. (2013). Public aesthetic preferences to inform sustainable wetland management in Victoria, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 120, 178-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.08.018
- Ghermandi, A. (2018). Integrating social media analysis and revealed preference methods to value the recreation services of ecologically engineered wetlands. Ecosystem Services, 31, 351-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.012
- Im, R.Y., Kim, T., Baek, C.Y., Lee, C.S., Kim, S.H., Lee, J.H., et al. (2020). The influence of surrounding land cover on wetland habitat conditions: a case study of inland wetlands in South Korea. PeerJ, 8, e9101. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9101
- Kaiser, N.N., Ghermandi, A., Feld, C.K., Hershkovitz, Y., Palt, M., and Stoll, S. (2021). Societal benefits of river restoration - implications from social media analysis. Ecosystem Services, 50, 101317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101317
- Lee, H., Seo, B., Koellner, T., and Lautenbach, S. (2019). Mapping cultural ecosystem services 2.0 - potential and short-comings from unlabeled crowd sourced images. Ecological Indicators, 96, 505-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.035
- Lee, J.H., Park, H.J., Kim, I., and Kwon, H.S. (2020). Analysis of cultural ecosystem services using text mining of residents' opinions. Ecological Indicators, 115, 106368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106368
- Oteros-Rozas, E., Martin-Lopez, B., Fagerholm, N., Bieling, C., and Plieninger, T. (2018). Using social media photos to explore the relation between cultural ecosystem services and landscape features across five European sites. Ecological Indicators, 94, 74-86.
- Park, E., Lee, S., and Peters, D.J. (2017). Iowa wetlands outdoor recreation visitors' decision-making process: an extended model of goal-directed behavior. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 17, 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2017.01.001
- Pedersen, E., Weisner, S., and Johansson, M. (2019). Wetland areas' direct contributions to residents' well-being entitle them to high cultural ecosystem values. The Science of the Total Environment, 646, 1315-1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.236
- Pueyo-Ros, J., Ribas, A., and Fraguell, R.M. (2019). A cultural approach to wetlands restoration to assess its public acceptance. Restoration Ecology, 27, 626-637. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12896
- Sinclair, M., Mayer, M., Woltering, M., and Ghermandi, A. (2020). Using social media to estimate visitor provenance and patterns of recreation in Germany's national parks. Journal of Environmental Management, 263, 110418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110418
- Small, N., Munday, M., and Durance, I. (2017). The challenge of valuing ecosystem services that have no material benefits. Global Environmental Change, 44, 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.005
- Sonti, N.F., Campbell, L.K., Svendsen, E.S., Johnson, M.L., and Novem Auyeung, D.S. (2020). Fear and fascination: use and perceptions of New York City's forests, wetlands, and landscaped park areas. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 49, 126601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126601
- Wang, Y., Yao, Y., and Ju, M. (2008). Wise use of wetlands: current state of protection and utilization of Chinese wetlands and recommendations for improvement. Environmental Management, 41, 793-808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9072-z
- Wilkins, E.J., Sinclair, W., Miller, H.M., and Schuster, R.M. (2019). Does proximity to wetlands matter? A landscape-level analysis of the influence of local wetlands on the public's concern for ecosystem services and conservation involvement. Wetlands, 39, 1271-1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1076-8
- Xu, X., Chen, M., Yang, G., Jiang, B., and Zhang, J. (2020). Wetland ecosystem services research: a critical review. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, e01027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01027
- Yoshimura, N., and Hiura, T. (2017). Demand and supply of cultural ecosystem services: use of geotagged photos to map the aesthetic value of landscapes in Hokkaido. Ecosystem Services, 24, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.009
- Zhou, L., Guan, D., Huang, X., Yuan, X., and Zhang, M. (2020). Evaluation of the cultural ecosystem services of wetland park. Ecological Indicators, 114, 106286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106286
- Zhu, L., Davis, L.S., and Carr, A. (2021). Visualising natural attractions within national parks: preferences of tourists for photographs with different visual characteristics. PloS One, 16, e0252661. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252661