References
- Huang L, Snyder AR, Morgan WF. Radiation-induced genomic instability and its implications for radiation carcinogenesis. Oncogene 2003;22:5848-5854 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206697
- Vaiserman A, Koliada A, Zabuga O, Socol Y. Health impacts of low-dose ionizing radiation: current scientific debates and regulatory issues. Dose Response 2018;16:1559325818796331
- Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, Prevedello LM, Nawfel RD, Hanson R, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 2009;251:175-184 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511081296
- Mullenders L, Atkinson M, Paretzke H, Sabatier L, Bouffler S. Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation. Nat Rev Cancer 2009;9:596-604 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2677
- National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2006:406
- Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277-2284 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra072149
- Yu L, Liu X, Leng S, Kofler JM, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Qu M, et al. Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective. Imaging Med 2009;1:65-84 https://doi.org/10.2217/iim.09.5
- Solomon J, Marin D, Roy Choudhury K, Patel B, Samei E. Effect of radiation dose reduction and reconstruction algorithm on image noise, contrast, resolution, and detectability of subtle hypoattenuating liver lesions at multidetector CT: filtered back projection versus a commercial model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm. Radiology 2017;284:777-787 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161736
- Patino M, Fuentes JM, Singh S, Hahn PF, Sahani DV. Iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominopelvic CT: technical concepts and clinical implementation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205:W19-W31 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13402
- Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, Licato PE, Do S, Pien HH, et al. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 2010;257:373-383 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10092212
- Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:713-719 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2989
- Lim K, Kwon H, Cho J, Oh J, Yoon S, Kang M, et al. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2015;39:443-448 https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000216
- Kwon H, Cho J, Oh J, Kim D, Cho J, Kim S, et al. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20150463
- Ehman EC, Yu L, Manduca A, Hara AK, Shiung MM, Jondal D, et al. Methods for clinical evaluation of noise reduction techniques in abdominopelvic CT. Radiographics 2014;34:849-862 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.344135128
- Mileto A, Guimaraes LS, McCollough CH, Fletcher JG, Yu L. State of the art in abdominal CT: the limits of iterative reconstruction algorithms. Radiology 2019;293:491-503 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019191422
- Schindera ST, Odedra D, Raza SA, Kim TK, Jang HJ, Szucs-Farkas Z, et al. Iterative reconstruction algorithm for CT: can radiation dose be decreased while low-contrast detectability is preserved? Radiology 2013;269:511-518 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13122349
- McCollough CH, Yu L, Kofler JM, Leng S, Zhang Y, Li Z, et al. Degradation of CT low-contrast spatial resolution due to the use of iterative reconstruction and reduced dose levels. Radiology 2015;276:499-506 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.15142047
- Hsieh J, Liu E, Nett B, Tang J, Thibault JB, Sahney S. A new era of image reconstruction: TrueFidelityTM. Technical white paper on deep learning image reconstruction. Milwaukee: GE Healthcare, 2019
- Racine D, Becce F, Viry A, Monnin P, Thomsen B, Verdun FR, et al. Task-based characterization of a deep learning image reconstruction and comparison with filtered back-projection and a partial model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: a phantom study. Phys Med 2020;76:28-37 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.06.004
- Greffier J, Hamard A, Pereira F, Barrau C, Pasquier H, Beregi JP, et al. Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 2020;30:3951-3959 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06724-w
- Jensen CT, Liu X, Tamm EP, Chandler AG, Sun J, Morani AC, et al. Image quality assessment of abdominal CT by use of new deep learning image reconstruction: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020;215:50-57 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.22332
- Noda Y, Iritani Y, Kawai N, Miyoshi T, Ishihara T, Hyodo F, et al. Deep learning image reconstruction for pancreatic low-dose computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021;46:4238-4244 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03111-x
- Nam JG, Hong JH, Kim DS, Oh J, Goo JM. Deep learning reconstruction for contrast-enhanced CT of the upper abdomen: similar image quality with lower radiation dose in direct comparison with iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol 2021;31:5533-5543 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07712-4
- Cao L, Liu X, Li J, Qu T, Chen L, Cheng Y, et al. A study of using a deep learning image reconstruction to improve the image quality of extremely low-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for patients with hepatic lesions. Br J Radiol 2021;94:20201086
- McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM Jr. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 2006;26:503-512 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.262055138
- American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. AAPM.org Web site. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_204.pdf. Accessed June 2, 2021
- Park C, Choo KS, Jung Y, Jeong HS, Hwang JY, Yun MS. CT iterative vs deep learning reconstruction: comparison of noise and sharpness. Eur Radiol 2021;31:3156-3164 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07358-8
- Ahn S, Park SH, Lee KH. How to demonstrate similarity by using noninferiority and equivalence statistical testing in radiology research. Radiology 2013;267:328-338 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12120725
- Nakamura Y, Narita K, Higaki T, Akagi M, Honda Y, Awai K. Diagnostic value of deep learning reconstruction for radiation dose reduction at abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT. Eur Radiol 2021;31:4700-4709 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07566-2
- Akagi M, Nakamura Y, Higaki T, Narita K, Honda Y, Awai K. Deep learning reconstruction of equilibrium phase CT images in obese patients. Eur J Radiol 2020;133:109349
- Chakraborty DP, Berbaum KS. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. Med Phys 2004;31:2313-2330 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1769352
- Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992;27:723-731 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199209000-00015
- Brennan RL, Prediger DJ. Coefficient kappa: some uses, misuses, and alternatives. Educ Psychol Meas 1981;41:687-699 https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448104100307
- Solomon J, Lyu P, Marin D, Samei E. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm. Med Phys 2020;47:3961-3971 https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14319
- Chen LH, Jin C, Li JY, Wang GL, Jia YJ, Duan HF, et al. Image quality comparison of two adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR, ASiR-V) algorithms and filtered back projection in routine liver CT. Br J Radiol 2018;91:20170655
- International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. ICRU report no. 87: radiation dose and image-quality assessment in computed tomography. J ICRU 2012;12:1-149