Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Novel approach to predicting the release probability when applying the MARSSIM statistical test to a survey unit with a specific residual radioactivity distribution based on Monte Carlo simulation

  • Received : 2021.08.04
  • Accepted : 2021.10.22
  • Published : 2022.05.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

For investigating whether the MARSSIM nonparametric test has sufficient statistical power when a site has a specific contamination distribution before conducting a final status survey (FSS), a novel approach was proposed to predict the release probability of the site. Five distributions were assumed: lognormal distribution, normal distribution, maximum extreme value distribution, minimum extreme value distribution, and uniform distribution. Hypothetical radioactivity populations were generated for each distribution, and Sign tests were performed to predict the release probabilities after extracting samples using Monte Carlo simulations. The designed Type I error (0.01, 0.05, and 0.1) was always satisfied for all distributions, while the designed Type II error (0.01, 0.05, and 0.1) was not always met for the uniform, maximum extreme value, and lognormal distributions. Through detailed analyses for lognormal and normal distributions which are often found for contaminants in actual environmental or soil samples, it was found that a greater statistical power was obtained from survey units with normal distribution than with lognormal distribution. This study is expected to contribute to achieving the designed decision error when the contamination distribution of a survey unit is identified, by predicting whether the survey unit passes the statistical test before undertaking the FSS according to MARSSIM.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20191510301290).

References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Power Plant Reactors in the World, Reference Data Series No.2, IAEA, Vienna, 2020.
  2. International Atomic Energy Agency, Release of Sites from Regulatory Control on Termination of Practices, IAEA Safety Standard Series No. WS-G-5.1, IAEA, Vienna, 2006.
  3. Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Criteria for Reuse of Site and Remaining Buildings after Completion of Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities, NSSC Notice No.2021-11, 2021. South Korea.
  4. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM). NUREG-1575, Rev.1, USNRC, Washington, DC, 2000.
  5. Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company, Haddam Neck Plant License Termination Plan, Rev.7, 2007. Washington, DC.
  6. Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company, Maine Yankee License Termination Plan, Rev.5, 2009. Washington, DC.
  7. S.B. Hong, D.S. Hwang, B.K. Seo, J.K. Moon, Practical application of the MARSSIM process to the site release of a uranium conversion plant following decommissioning, Ann. Nucl. Energy 65 (2014) 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.11.018
  8. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Monitoring for Compliance with Decommissioning Termination Survey Criteria, NUREG/CR-2082, 1981.
  9. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Manual for Conducting Radiological Surveys in Support of License Termination, NUREG/CR-5849, 1992.
  10. W.R. Ott, A physical explanation of the lognormality of pollutant concentrations, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 40 (1990) 1378-1383, https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1990.10466789.
  11. Environmental Protection Agency, The Lognormal Distribution in Environmental Applications. EPA/600/R-97/006, EPA, Washington, DC, 1997.
  12. W. Sohn, H.-W. Seo, K. Jeong, An approach for determining reasonable sample sizes of MARSSIM final status surveys in decommissioning of nuclear facilities, Ann. Nucl. Energy 131 (2019) 378-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.04.009
  13. W. Sohn, M. Jeong, K. Jeong, Theoretical comparative study of t tests and nonparametric tests for final status surveys of MARSSIM at decommissioning sites, Ann. Nucl. Energy 135 (2020) 106945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.106945
  14. W. Sohn, E.-h. Hong, Monte Carlo simulation for verification of nonparametric tests used in final status surveys of MARSSIM at decommissioning of nuclear facilities, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 53 (2021) 1664-1675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.10.014
  15. Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station. Rancho Seco Final Status Survey Summary Report, IOSB outside Area Class 2 Survey Unit F8300142, 2017.
  16. Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company, Haddam Neck Plant Final Status Survey Final Report, Phase VII, 2007.
  17. Oracle And/or its Affiliate, Oracle Crystal Ball Software User Manual, Version 11.2.4.
  18. Environmental Protection Agency, Data Quality Assessment: A Reviewer's Guide, EPA QA/G-9R, EPA, Washington, DC, 2006.
  19. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols Manual (MARLAP), Part II: Chapter 18-20, Appendix G (Volume III), NUREG-1576, USNRC, Washington, DC, 2004.
  20. H. Pham, Springer Handbook of Engineering Statistics, Springer, 2006.
  21. C. Lataniotis, E. Torre, S. Marelli, B. Sudret, UQLab user manual - The INPUT module, Report # UQLab-V1.4-102, Chair of Risk, Safety and Uncertainty Quantification, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, 2021.