DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nuclear energy consumption, nuclear fusion reactors and environmental quality: The case of G7 countries

  • Cakar, Nigar Demircan (Duzce University, Faculty of Business Administration) ;
  • Erdogan, Seyfettin (Istanbul Medeniyet University, Faculty of Political Sciences, Department of Economics) ;
  • Gedikli, Ayfer (Duzce University, Faculty of Political Sciences, Department of Economics) ;
  • Oncu, Mehmet Akif (Duzce University, Faculty of Business Administration)
  • 투고 : 2021.07.14
  • 심사 : 2021.10.11
  • 발행 : 2022.04.25

초록

Global climate change brings environmental quality sensitivity, especially in developed countries. Developed countries use non-renewable energy sources intensively both in their own countries and in other countries, they make productions that cause an enormous rate of increase in CO2 emissions and unsustainable environmental costs. This has increased the interest in environmentally friendly alternative energy sources. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of nuclear energy consumption and technological innovation on environmental quality in G7 countries using annual data over the period 1970-2015. The Panel Threshold Regression Model was used for the analysis. Empirical findings have indicated that the relationship between nuclear energy consumption and carbon emissions differs according to innovation for nuclear power plants. It was also concluded that nuclear energy consumption reduces carbon emissions more after a certain level of innovation. This result shows that the increase in innovative technologies for nuclear power plants not only increases energy efficiency but also contributes positively to environmental quality.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. K. Saidi, M.B. Mbarek, Nuclear energy, renewable energy, CO2 emissions, and economic growth for nine developed countries: evidence from panel Granger causality tests, Prog. Nucl. Energy 88 (2016) 364-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.01.018
  2. C.C. Lee, Y.B. Chiu, Oil prices, nuclear energy consumption, and economic growth: new evidence using a heterogeneous panel analysis, Energy Pol. 39 (4) (2011) 2111-2120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.002
  3. K.V. Hecke, Nuclear energy in the European union, Stud. Dipl. 60 (2) (2007) 131-155.
  4. C.I. Aydin, Nuclear energy debate in Turkey: stakeholders, policy alternatives, and governance issues, Energy Pol. 136 (2020) 111041, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111041.
  5. M.B. Mbarek, R. Khairallah, R. Feki, Causality relationships between renewable energy, nuclear energy and economic growth in France, Environ. Syst. Decis. 35 (1) (2015) 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-015-9537-6
  6. L. Peng, Y. Zhang, F. Li, Q. Wang, X. Chen, A. Yu, Policy implication of nuclear energy's potential for energy optimization and CO2 mitigation: a case study of Fujian, China, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 51 (4) (2019) 1154-1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.01.016
  7. C.Y.L. Hsiao, Y. Ou, N. Sheng, X. Wei, Measuring contagion effects of nuclear energy policies and events, Int. J. Energy Res. 45 (2021) 11510-11525. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.6421
  8. V.P. Nguyen, M.S. Yim, Examination of different socioeconomic factors that contribute to the public acceptance of nuclear energy, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 50 (5) (2018) 767-772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.02.005
  9. A.M. Herbst, G.W. Hopley, Nuclear Energy Now- Why the Time Has Comefor the World's Most Misunderstood Energy Source, John Wiley&Sons Inc., New Jersey, 2007.
  10. O. Akira, Developing the necessary infrastructure- IAEA activities in support of countries considering embarking on nuclear power program, in: S. Apikyan, D.J. Diamond (Eds.), Nuclear Power and Energy Security, Springer, 2010, pp. 1-8.
  11. A.J. Baratta, The role of nuclear power in the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, in: A.A. Apikyan, D.J. Diamond (Eds.), Nuclear Power and Energy Security, the NATO Sciences for Peace and Security Program, Springer, 2009, pp. 79-88.
  12. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, 69th edition, 2020.
  13. IEA Background information. https://www.iea.org/events/japan-2021-energypolicy-review, 2021c.
  14. IEA, Countries and regions, March 30, 2021, https://www.iea.org/countries, 2021d.
  15. J. Lewis, G7 members land blow to fossil fuels - but gas 'may still be needed' in transition. https://www.upstreamonline.com/energy-transition/g7-membersland-blow-to-fossil-fuels-but-gas-may-still-be-needed-in-transition/2-1-1014680, 24 May 2021.
  16. Statista, Percentage of world nuclear power consumption in 2019. https://www.statista.com/statistics/201683/percentage-of-world-nuclear-electricitygeneration-by-country/, 2021.
  17. BP Nuclear energy. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energyeconomics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/nuclear-energy.html, 2021.
  18. IEA net zero by 2050-A roadmap for the global energy. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/20959e2e-7ab8-4f2a-b1c6-4e63387f03a1/NetZeroby2050-ARoadmapfortheGlobalEnergySector_CORR.pdf, 2021a.
  19. IEA report extract nuclear. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energyreview-2020/nuclear, 2021b.
  20. Enerdata Global energy statistical yearbook. https://yearbook.enerdata.net/renewables/renewable-in-electricity-production-share.html, 2020.
  21. S.H. Yoo, S.J. Ku, Causal relationship between nuclear energy consumption and economic growth: a multi-country analysis, Energy Pol. 37 (5) (2009) 1905-1913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.01.012
  22. N. Apergis, J.E. Payne, A panel study of nuclear energy consumption and economic growth, Energy Econ. 32 (3) (2010) 545-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.09.015
  23. S.H. Yoo, K.O. Jung, Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in Korea, Prog. Nucl. Energy 46 (2) (2005) 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2005.01.001
  24. Y. Wolde-Rufael, K. Menyah K, Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in nine developed countries, Energy Econ. 32 (3) (2010) 550-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.01.004
  25. A. Omri, N.B. Mabrouk, A. Sassi-Tmar, Modeling the causal linkages between nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in developed and developing countries, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 42 (2015) 1012-1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.046
  26. M. Luqman, N. Ahmad, K. Bakhsh, Nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in Pakistan: evidence from non-linear autoregressive distributed lag model, Renew. Energy 139 (2019) 1299-1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.008
  27. D. Kirikkaleli, F.F. Adedoyin, F.V. Bekun, Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in the UK: evidence from wavelet coherence approach, J. Publ. Aff. 21 (1) (2021), https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2130.
  28. J.E. Payne, J.P. Taylor, Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in the US: an empirical note, Energy Sources B Energy Econ. Plann. 5 (3) (2010) 301-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240802533955
  29. B. Ozcan, A. Ari, Nuclear energy consumption-economic growth nexus in OECD: a bootstrap causality test, Procedia Econ. and Finance 30 (2015) 586-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01271-X
  30. K. Menyah, Y. Wolde-Rufael, CO2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US, Energy Pol. 38 (6) (2010) 2911-2915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.024
  31. N. Apergis, J.E. Payne, K. Menyah, Y. Wolde-Rufael, On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth, Ecol. Econ. 69 (11) (2010) 2255-2260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.014
  32. J. Baek, D. Pride, On the incomeenuclear energy-CO2 emissions nexus revisited, Energy Econ. 43 (2014) 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.01.015
  33. R. Rani, N. Kumar, Does nuclear energy consumption improve environment? Empirical evidence from India, Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. 16 (4) (2017) 1075-1079.
  34. B. Ozcan Danish, R. Ulucak, An empirical investigation of nuclear energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission in India: bridging IPAT and EKC hypotheses, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 (2021) 2056-2065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.12.008
  35. M. Sahoo, J. Sahoo, Effects of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions in India: empirical evidence from disaggregated data analysis, J. Publ. Aff. (2020), e2307, https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2307.
  36. S. Lee, M. Kim, J. Lee, Analyzing the impact of nuclear power on CO2 emissions, Sustainability 9 (8) (2017) 1428, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081428.
  37. K. Dong, R. Sun, H. Jiang, X. Zeng, CO2 emissions, economic growth, and the environmental Kuznets curve in China: what roles can nuclear energy and renewable energy play? J. Clean. Prod. 196 (2018) 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.271
  38. K. Saidi, A. Omri, Reducing CO2 emissions in OECD countries: do renewable and nuclear energy matter? Prog. Nucl. Energy 126 (2020) 103425, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103425.
  39. S.U.D. Khan Danish, A. Ahmad, Testing the pollution haven hypothesis on the pathway of sustainable development: accounting the role of nuclear energy consumption, Nucl. Eng. and Technol. 53 (2021) 2746-2752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.02.008
  40. S.T. Hassan, Danish, S.U.D. Khan, M.A. Baloch, Z.H. Tarar, Is nuclear energy a better alternative for mitigating CO2 emissions in BRICS countries? An empirical analysis, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52 (12) (2020) 2969-2974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.05.016
  41. A. Azam, M. Rafiq, M. Shafique, H. Zhang, J. Yuan, Analyzing the effect of natural gas, nuclear energy and renewable energy on GDP and carbon emissions: a multi-variate panel data analysis, Energy 219 (2021) 119592, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119592.
  42. U. Al-Mulali, Investigating the impact of nuclear energy consumption on GDP growth and CO2 emission: a panel data analysis, Prog. Nucl. Energy 73 (2014) 172-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.02.002
  43. T. Jin, J. Kim, What is better for mitigating carbon emissions-Renewable energy or nuclear energy? A panel data analysis, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 91 (2018) 464-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.022
  44. N. Mahmood, Danish, Z. Wang, B. Zhang, The role of nuclear energy in the correction of environmental pollution: evidence from Pakistan, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52 (6) (2020) 1327-1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.11.027
  45. Q. Fei, R. Rasiah, L.J. Shen, The clean energy-growth nexus with CO2 emissions and technological innovation in Norway and New Zealand, Energy Environ. 25 (8) (2014) 1323-1344. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958-305X.25.8.1323
  46. A. Ahmed, G.S. Uddin, K. Sohag, Biomass energy, technological progress and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from selected European countries, Biomass Bioenergy 90 (2016) 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.04.004
  47. M.W. Murad, M.M. Alam, A.H.M. Noman, I. Ozturk, Dynamics of technological innovation, energy consumption, energy price and economic growth in Denmark, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 38 (1) (2019) 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12905
  48. S. Erdogan, S. Yildirim, D.C. Yildirim, A. Gedikli, The effects of innovation on sectoral carbon emissions: evidence from G20 countries, J. Environ. Manag. 267 (2020) 110637, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110637.
  49. M. Mongo, F. Belaid, B. Ramdani, The effects of environmental innovations on CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from Europe, Environ. Sci. Pol. 118 (2021) 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.004
  50. S. Erdogan, Dynamic nexus between technological innovation and buildings Sector's carbon emission in BRICS countries, J. Environ. Manag. 293 (2021) 112780, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112780.
  51. M.S. Alam, N. Apergis, S. R Paramati, J. Fang, The impacts of R&D investment and stock markets on clean-energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD economies, Int. J. Finance Econ. (2020) 1-14, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2049.
  52. D.I. Godil, Z. Yu, A. Sharif, R. Usman, S.A.R. Khan, Investigate the Role of Technology Innovation and Renewable Energy in Reducing Transport Sector CO2 Emission in China: A Path toward Sustainable Development, Sustainable Development, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2167.
  53. H. Altuntas, Y. Kassouri, The impact of energy technology innovations on cleaner energy supply and carbon footprints in Europe: a linear versus nonlinear approach, J. Clean. Prod. 276 (2020) 124140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124140
  54. A. Alvarez-Herranz, D. Balsalobre-Lorente, M. Shahbaz, J.M. Cantos, Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution, Energy Pol. 105 (2017) 386-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.009
  55. J.B. Ang, CO2 emissions, research and technology transfer in China, Ecol. Econ. 68 (10) (2009) 2658-2665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.002
  56. C.N. Mensah, X. Long, K.B. Boamah, I.A. Bediako, L. Dauda, M. Salman, The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OECD countries from 1990 to 2014, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 25 (2018) 29678-29698.
  57. J.A. Baek, panel cointegration analysis of CO2 emissions, nuclear energy and income in major nuclear generating countries, Appl. Energy 145 (2015) 133-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.074
  58. H.-T. Pao, C.-C. Chen, Decoupling strategies: CO2 emissions, energy resources, and economic growth in the Group of Twenty, J. Clean. Prod. 206 (2019) 907-919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.190
  59. Z. Khan, S. Ali, M. Umar, D. Kirikkaleli, Z. Jiao, Consumption-based carbon emissions and international trade in G7 countries: the role of environmental innovation and renewable energy, Sci. Total Environ. 730 (2020) 138945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138945
  60. M. Shahbaz, S. Nasreen, K. Ahmed, S. Hammoudeh, Trade openness-carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels, Energy Econ. 61 (2017) 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.008
  61. J.C. Driscoll, A.C. Kraay, Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data, Rev. Econ. Stat. 80 (1998) 549-560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
  62. Q. Wang, F. Zhang, The effects of trade openness on decoupling carbon emissions from economic growth e evidence from 182 countries, J. Clean. Prod. 279 (2021) 123838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123838
  63. O.K. Essandoh, M. Islam, M. Kakinaka, Linking international trade and foreign direct investment to CO2 emissions: any differences between developed and developing countries? Sci. Total Environ. 712 (10) (2020) 136437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136437
  64. Y.Z. Zhang, Y.-L. Peng, C.-Q. Ma, B. Shen, Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China, Energy Pol. 100 (2017) 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.005
  65. F. Ganda, The impact of innovation and technology investments on carbon emissions in selected Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries, J. Clean. Prod. 217 (2019) 469-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.235
  66. T.T. Nguyen, T.A.T. Pham, H.T.X. Tram, Role of information and communication technologies and innovation in driving carbon emissions and economic growth in selected G-20 countries, J. Environ. Manag. 261 (2020) 110162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110162
  67. B.E. Hansen, Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference, J. Econom. 93 (1999) 345-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00025-1
  68. W. Mensi, S. Hammoudeh, S.-M. Yoon, M. Balcilar, Impact of macroeconomic factors and country risk ratings on GCC stock markets: evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model with regime switching, Appl. Econ. 49 (13) (2017) 1255-1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1217305
  69. M.H. Pesaran, Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels, Econom. Rev. 34 (2015) 1089-1117, 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623
  70. K.S. Im, M.H. Pesaran, Y. Shin, Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels, J. Econom. 115 (2003) 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
  71. M.H. Pesaran, A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence, J. Appl. Econom. 22 (2007) 265-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
  72. I. Ozturk, Measuring the impact of alternative and nuclear energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and oil rents on specific growth factors in the panel of Latin American countries, Prog. Nucl. Energy 100 (2017) 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.05.030