Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

On-line measurement and simulation of the in-core gamma energy deposition in the McMaster nuclear reactor

  • Received : 2021.07.01
  • Accepted : 2021.07.26
  • Published : 2022.01.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In a nuclear reactor, gamma radiation is the dominant energy deposition in non-fuel regions. Heat is generated upon gamma deposition and consequently affects the mechanical and thermal structure of the material. Therefore, the safety of samples should be carefully considered so that their integrity and quality can be retained. To evaluate relevant parameters, an in-core gamma thermometer (GT) was used to measure gamma heating (GH) throughout the operation of the McMaster nuclear reactor (MNR) at four irradiation sites. Additionally, a Monte Carlo reactor physics code (Serpent-2) was utilized to model the MNR with the GT located in the same irradiation sites used in the measurement to verify its predictions against measured GH. This research aids in the development of modeling, calculation, and prediction of the GH utilizing Serpent-2 as well as implementing a new GH measurement at the MNR core. After all uncertainties were quantified for both approaches, comparable GH profiles were observed between the measurements and calculations. In addition, the GH values found in the four sites represent a strong level of radiation based on the distance of the sample from the core. In this study, the maximum and minimum GH values were found at 0.32 ± 0.05 W/g and 0.15 ± 0.02 W/g, respectively, corresponding to 320 Sv/s and 150 Sv/s. These values are crucial to be considered whenever sample is planned to be irradiated inside the MNR core.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The author would like to express gratitude to Dr. Adriaan Buijs and Dr. Simon Day. In addition, he would like to thank the MNR staff for their help during GH measurements. Finally, the author thanks the reactor manager and supervisor, Rob Pasuta and Jay Grigg-Tait, for always being available to answer inquiries regarding the reactor operation.

References

  1. M. Lemaire, C. Vaglio-Gaudard, A. Lyoussi, C. Reynard-Carette, For a better estimation of gamma heating in nuclear material-testing reactors and associated devices: status and work plan from calculation methods to nuclear data, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 52 (2015) 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2015.1009957.
  2. C. Heysel, A. Armstrong, J. Bennett, E. Werger, Z. Naperstkow, R. Pasuta, Canadian nuclear society (CNS), CUSTOMIZED IRRADIATION SITES FOR MEDICAL ISOTOPE PRODUCTION 50 (2018).
  3. Manual for reactor produced radioisotopes, Tech. Rep. IAEATECDOC-1340, International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA, 2003.
  4. M. Alqahtani, A. Buijs, S. Day, Experimental measure and Monte Carlo code simulation of the gamma heating at different irradiation sites in a nuclear research reactor, Nucl. Eng. Des. 364 (2020), 110690, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110690. URL, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549320301849.
  5. Y. Liu, W. Martin, T. Downar, Delayed fission energy effect on LWR normal operation and transients, in: Proceedings of PHYSOR 2018, PHYSOR 2018: Reactor Physics Paving the Way towards More Efficient Systems, Sociedad Nuclear Mexicana., Mexico, 2018.
  6. J.R. Lamarsh, Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Theory, second ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1983.
  7. S. Day, McMaster Nuclear Reactor Specification, IAEA CRP 1496: Innovative Methods for Research Reactors, 2011.
  8. M. Alqahtani, S.E. Days, A. Buijs, OSCAR-4 code system comparison and analysis with a first-order semi-empirical method for core-follow depletion calculation in McMaster nuclear reactor (MNR), CNL Nuclear Review (2019), https://doi.org/10.12943/CNR.2019.00011.
  9. O. Aarestad, In-core instrumentation for LWRs, presented at IAEA meeting on "in-core instrumentation and in-situ measurements in connection with fuel behaviour", held in petten, The Netherlands, October. URL, https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/, 1992. Public/28/018/28018794.pdf.
  10. D. Fourmentel, C. Reynard-Carette, A. Lyoussi, J.F. Villard, J.Y. Malo, M. Carette, J. Brun, P. Guimbal, Y. Zerega, Nuclear Heating Measurements in Material Testing Reactor: A Comparison between a Differential Calorimeter and a Gamma Thermometer, vol. 60, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2013, pp. 328-335, 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2012.2232304
  11. K, Stoll," a Time-dependent Description of In-Core Gamma Heating in the Mcmaster Nuclear Reactor", Ph.D. thesis, McMaster University, 2016.
  12. T. Kaltiaisenaho, Implementing a photon physics model in serpent 2; fotonifysiikkamallin kehittaminen serpent 2-koodiin, G2 pro gradu, diplomityo (2016-06-14), URL, http://urn.fi/URN. NBN:fi:aalto-201606172612.
  13. J. Leppanen, T. Kaltiaisenaho, V. Valtavirta, M. Metsala, Development of a coupled neutron/photon transport mode in the serpent 2 Monte Carlo code, 2017, international conference on mathematics and computational methods applied to nuclear science and engineering, mamp;C, in: Mamp;C 2017 ; Conference Date: 16-04-2017 through 20-04-2017, 2017.
  14. J. Leppanen, T. Kaltiaisenaho, Expanding the use of serpent 2 to fusion applications: shut-down dose rate calculations, Proceedings of PHYSOR 2016, American Nuclear Society (ANS), United States (2016). ISBN: 978-0-89448-762-2.
  15. R. Tuominen, V. Valtavirta, J. Leppanen, New energy deposition treatment in the serpent 2 Monte Carlo transport code, Ann. Nucl. Energy 129 (2019) 224-232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene, 2019. 02.003.
  16. R. Macfarlane, D.W. Muir, R.M. Boicourt, A.C. Kahler, J.L. Conlin, The NJOY Nuclear Data Processing System, Tech. Rep. LAUR-17-20093, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2016.
  17. A. Trkov, M. Herman, D.A. Brown, ENDF-6 formats manual e data formats and procedures for the evaluated nuclear data files ENDF/B-VI, ENDF/B-VII and ENDF/B-VIII., tech. Rep BNL-90365-2009 Rev.2, Brookhaven National Laboratory, 2018. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1425114.
  18. M. Alqahtani, A. Buijs, S.E. Day, Serpent-2 and OSCAR-4 computational tools compared against McMaster nuclear reactor improved operational data history for U-235 fuel inventory tracking, local power tracking and validation of multiplication factor, Ann. Nucl. Energy 145 (2020) 107590, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107590.
  19. M. Chadwick, M. Herman, P. Oblozinsky, M. Dunn, Y. Danon, A. Kahler, D. Smith, B. Pritychenko, G. Arbanas, R. Arcilla, R. Brewer, D. Brown, R. Capote, A. Carlson, Y. Cho, H. Derrien, K. Guber, G. Hale, S. Hoblit, S. Holloway, T. Johnson, T. Kawano, B. Kiedrowski, H. Kim, S. Kunieda, N. Larson, L. Leal, J. Lestone, R. Little, E. McCutchan, R. MacFarlane, M. MacInnes, C. Mattoon, R. McKnight, S. Mughabghab, G. Nobre, G. Palmiotti, A. Palumbo, M. Pigni, V. Pronyaev, R. Sayer, A. Sonzogni, N. Summers, P. Talou, I. Thompson, A. Trkov, R. Vogt, S. van der Marck, A. Wallner, M. White, D. Wiarda, P. Young, Endf/b-vii.1 nuclear data for science and technology: cross sections, co-variances, fission product yields and decay data, Nuclear Data Sheets 112 (12) (2011) 2887-2996, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009037521100113X. special Issue on ENDF/B-VII.1 Library, URL.
  20. T.E. Connectivity, Understanding RTDs. https://www.te.com/global-en/industries/sensor-solutions/insights/understanding-rtds.html, 2020-10-17.
  21. International Bureau of Weights and Measures, Evaluation of measurement data - guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, JCGM 2008 (2008).