Korean Journal of Radiology

The Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Phase I Clinical Trial of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeting 68Ga-NGUL PET/CT in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Prostate Cancer

  • Minseok Suh (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hyun Gee Ryoo (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Keon Wook Kang (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jae Min Jeong (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chang Wook Jeong (Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Cheol Kwak (Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Gi Jeong Cheon (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2021.09.16
  • Accepted : 2022.05.20
  • Published : 2022.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: 68Ga-NGUL is a novel prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting tracer based on Glu-Urea-Lys derivatives conjugated to a 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-N,N',N''-triacetic acid (NOTA) chelator via a thiourea-type short linker. This phase I clinical trial of 68Ga-NGUL was conducted to evaluate the safety and radiation dosimetry of 68Ga-NGUL in healthy volunteers and the lesion detection rate of 68Ga-NGUL in patients with prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: We designed a prospective, open-label, single-arm clinical trial with two cohorts comprising six healthy adult men and six patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Safety and blood test-based toxicities were monitored throughout the study. PET/CT scans were acquired at multiple time points after administering 68Ga-NGUL (2 MBq/kg; 96-165 MBq). In healthy adults, absorbed organ doses and effective doses were calculated using the OLINDA/EXM software. In patients with prostate cancer, the rates of detecting suspicious lesions by 68Ga-NGUL PET/CT and conventional imaging (CT and bone scintigraphy) during the screening period, within one month after recruitment, were compared. Results: All 12 participants (six healthy adults aged 31-32 years and six prostate cancer patients aged 57-81 years) completed the clinical trial. No drug-related adverse events were observed. In the healthy adult group, 68Ga-NGUL was rapidly distributed, with the highest uptake in the kidneys. The median effective dose coefficient was calculated as 0.025 mSv/MBq, and cumulative activity in the bladder had the highest contribution. In patients with metastatic prostate cancer, 229 suspicious lesions were detected using either 68Ga-NGUL PET/CT or conventional imaging. Among them, 68Ga-NGUL PET/CT detected 199 (86.9%) lesions and CT or bone scintigraphy detected 114 (49.8%) lesions. Conclusion: 68Ga-NGUL can be safely applied clinically and has shown a higher detection rate for the localization of metastatic lesions in prostate cancer than conventional imaging. Therefore, 68Ga-NGUL is a valuable option for prostate cancer imaging.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was funded by Cellbion Co., Ltd. (Seoul, Korea). This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (20001235, Development of Novel Radiopharmaceutical for Prostate Cancer Targeted Imaging Diagnosis) funded By the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MI, Korea) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) (No. 2020M2D9A1093988).

References

  1. Rawla P. Epidemiology of prostate cancer. World J Oncol 2019;10:63-89 https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1191
  2. Oh SW, Cheon GJ. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging in prostate cancer: opportunities and challenges. Korean J Radiol 2018;19:819-831 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.5.819
  3. Futterer JJ, Nagarajah J. Research highlight: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging for pelvic nodal metastasis in prostate cancer. Korean J Radiol 2022;23:293-294 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0938
  4. Carlucci G, Ippisch R, Slavik R, Mishoe A, Blecha J, Zhu S. 68Ga-PSMA-11 NDA approval: a novel and successful academic partnership. J Nucl Med 2021;62:149-155 https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.260455
  5. Morris MJ, Rowe SP, Gorin MA, Saperstein L, Pouliot F, Josephson D, et al. Diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT in men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: results from the CONDOR phase III, multicenter study. Clin Cancer Res 2021;27:3674-3682 https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4573
  6. Moon SH, Hong MK, Kim YJ, Lee YS, Lee DS, Chung JK, et al. Development of a Ga-68 labeled PET tracer with short linker for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting. Bioorg Med Chem 2018;26:2501-2507 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2018.04.014
  7. Evans BJ, King AT, Katsifis A, Matesic L, Jamie JF. Methods to enhance the metabolic stability of peptide-based PET radiopharmaceuticals. Molecules 2020;25:2314
  8. Suh M, Im HJ, Ryoo HG, Kang KW, Jeong JM, Prakash S, et al. Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-NOTA (68Ga-NGUL) and 68Ga-PSMA-11 in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: a prospective study. J Nucl Med 2021;62:1457-1460 https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.258434
  9. Bolch WE, Eckerman KF, Sgouros G, Thomas SR. MIRD pamphlet No. 21: a generalized schema for radiopharmaceutical dosimetry--standardization of nomenclature. J Nucl Med 2009;50:477-484 https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.056036
  10. ICRP. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1-332
  11. Hofman MS, Emmett L, Sandhu S, Iravani A, Joshua AM, Goh JC, et al. [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2021;397:797-804 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00237-3
  12. Hofman MS, Violet J, Hicks RJ, Ferdinandus J, Thang SP, Akhurst T, et al. [177Lu]-PSMA-617 radionuclide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (LuPSMA trial): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:825-833 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30198-0
  13. Morris MJ, De Bono JS, Chi KN, Fizazi K, Herrmann K, Rahbar K, et al. Phase III study of lutetium-177-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (VISION). J Clin Oncol 2021;39:LBA4
  14. Afshar-Oromieh A, Hetzheim H, Kratochwil C, Benesova M, Eder M, Neels OC, et al. The theranostic PSMA ligand PSMA-617 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer by PET/CT: biodistribution in humans, radiation dosimetry, and first evaluation of tumor lesions. J Nucl Med 2015;56:1697-1705 https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.161299
  15. Szabo Z, Mena E, Rowe SP, Plyku D, Nidal R, Eisenberger MA, et al. Initial evaluation of [18F]DCFPyL for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging of prostate cancer. Mol Imaging Biol 2015;17:565-574 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-015-0850-8
  16. University of California Los Angeles. Ga 68 PSMA-11 [package insert]. accessdata.fda.gov Web site. www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2020/212642s000lbl.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2021
  17. Thorne MC. Background radiation: natural and man-made. J Radiol Prot 2003;23:29-42 https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/23/1/302
  18. Eiber M, Maurer T, Souvatzoglou M, Beer AJ, Ruffani A, Haller B, et al. Evaluation of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET/ CT in 248 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med 2015;56:668-674 https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.154153
  19. Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet 2020;395:1208-1216 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30314-7
  20. Ceci F, Uprimny C, Nilica B, Geraldo L, Kendler D, Kroiss A, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for restaging recurrent prostate cancer: which factors are associated with PET/CT detection rate? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015;42:1284-1294 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3078-6
  21. Schmidkonz C, Cordes M, Schmidt D, Bauerle T, Goetz TI, Beck M, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-derived metabolic parameters for determination of whole-body tumor burden and treatment response in prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:1862-1872 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4042-z
  22. Gupta A, Shin JH, Lee MS, Park JY, Kim K, Kim JH, et al. Voxel-based dosimetry of iron oxide nanoparticle-conjugated 177Lu-labeled folic acid using SPECT/CT imaging of mice. Mol Pharm 2019;16:1498-1506 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b01125